Head to head · Automation workflows · October 2026 research run
Microsoft Power Automate vs Windmill API + MCP
Microsoft Power Automate scores 62 (B) on agent readiness against Windmill API + MCP's 55.9 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Windmill API + MCP leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do automation workflows.
Which one, for what
Good for Organisations already on Microsoft 365 and Dataverse that want an agent to inventory, deploy or adjust flows inside existing roles and solutions.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 63 against 40
- Transparency & trust, 76 against 65
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Windmill API + MCP loses 5 points for them
Watch for
Flows under My flows can't be managed in code, and Microsoft calls the api.flow.microsoft.com API unsupported
Good for Engineering teams who'd rather write steps in Python, TypeScript, Go or SQL and expose them as tools.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 79 against 68
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 25
- Maintenance & community, 87 against 76
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Open source
Watch for
The default MCP URL puts the token in ?token= unless a superadmin turns that off
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Microsoft Power Automate | Windmill API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 63 | 40 | Microsoft Power Automate +23 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 68 | 79 | Windmill API + MCP +11 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 73 | Windmill API + MCP +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 61 | 60 | Microsoft Power Automate +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 25 | 35 | Windmill API + MCP +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 76 | 87 | Windmill API + MCP +11 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 76 | 65 | Microsoft Power Automate +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | 62 · B | 55.9 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Microsoft Power Automate | Windmill API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Microsoft | Windmill Labs |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://app.windmill.dev/api |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Microsoft Product Terms for Microsoft Power Platform | AGPL-3.0 (core), Apache-2.0 (clients and OpenAPI), commercial for enterprise-only parts |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-01 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-01 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 11k PyPI/wk | 18k stars, 126k npm/wk, 218k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Microsoft Power Automate
Cloud flows in a solution are rows an agent can read and write through the Dataverse Web API under Entra ID OAuth and security roles, with published limits and a 99.9 per cent SLA. Flows under My flows can't be managed in code, a flow's body is one hand-built JSON string, and setup needs a tenant administrator.
Windmill API + MCP
Token scopes down to a single script path, with expiry. The default MCP URL puts the token in ?token= unless a superadmin turns that off.
Before you call either
Microsoft Power Automate
- Filter
workflowsoncategory eq 5for cloud flows, and add$select, becauseclientdataholds the whole definition - Flows created through the API start with
statecode0 (off). The docs say to turn the flow on before use - Put the flow in a solution first. Flows that sit only under My flows are outside the supported API
- On 429 wait the
Retry-Afterseconds. Reads offlowrunscount against the daily Power Platform request allowance - Treat an HTTP trigger URL with
sig=as a secret, and prefer the tenant or named-user trigger modes with a bearer token forhttps://service.flow.microsoft.com/
Windmill API + MCP
- Give the agent a token scoped to
jobs:runon one folder rather than a full user token - Connect over the OAuth gateway or send the token in a header so it stays out of logs
- With a multi-workspace token, pass
workspace_idon every workspace tool - Call
searchDocsbefore guessing at a flag or config key, thenreadDocsPagewith the returned URL - Poll the job by ID after
runScriptByPathfor long jobs instead of waiting on the call
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Microsoft Power Automate or Windmill API + MCP?
Microsoft Power Automate scores 62 (B) on agent readiness against Windmill API + MCP's 55.9 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Windmill API + MCP leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and maintenance & community.
Do Microsoft Power Automate and Windmill API + MCP need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Microsoft Power Automate and Windmill API + MCP without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Microsoft Power Automate. Windmill API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://app.windmill.dev/api.
Are Microsoft Power Automate and Windmill API + MCP open source?
No open-source release is listed for Microsoft Power Automate. Windmill API + MCP is open source (AGPL-3.0 (core), Apache-2.0 (clients and OpenAPI), commercial for enterprise-only parts).
Other comparisons with Microsoft Power Automate or Windmill API + MCP
- Activepieces API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Activepieces API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP
- Make API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Make API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP
- n8n API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate
- n8n API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP
- Paragon ActionKit + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Pipedream API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Pipedream API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Tray.ai API + MCP
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Workato API + MCP
- Tray.ai API + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP
- Windmill API + MCP vs Workato API + MCP
- Paragon ActionKit + MCP vs Windmill API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/power-automate-vs-windmill.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/power-automate.json·/api/v1/tools/windmill.json - From a terminal
anchor compare power-automate windmill(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "power-automate", "b": "windmill"}at/mcp, no key