Head to head · Automation workflows · October 2026 research run
Gumloop vs Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate and Gumloop score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 62 (B) and 61.6 (C). Gumloop leads on reliability and schema & documentation. Both do automation workflows.
Which one, for what
Gumloop C
Good for A team that wants hosted agents with connectors, approvals and triggers, driven or configured by an outside agent through the API or MCP server.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 82 against 63
- Schema & documentation, 83 against 68
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
API keys and the gumloop_api OAuth scope need the Pro plan at $37 a month. The 14-day trial needs a card
Good for Organisations already on Microsoft 365 and Dataverse that want an agent to inventory, deploy or adjust flows inside existing roles and solutions.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 61 against 50
- Payments & pricing, 25 against 20
- Transparency & trust, 76 against 57
Watch for
Flows under My flows can't be managed in code, and Microsoft calls the api.flow.microsoft.com API unsupported
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Gumloop | Microsoft Power Automate | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 82 | 63 | Gumloop +19 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 83 | 68 | Gumloop +15 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 66 | 69 | Microsoft Power Automate +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 50 | 61 | Microsoft Power Automate +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 25 | Microsoft Power Automate +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 77 | 76 | Gumloop +1 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 57 | 76 | Microsoft Power Automate +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | 61.6 · C | 62 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Gumloop | Microsoft Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | AgentHub Inc. | Microsoft |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.gumloop.com/api/v1 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Gumloop's terms of service. The Python SDK and CLI repository and the npm package are Apache-2.0 | Proprietary service under the Microsoft Product Terms for Microsoft Power Platform |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-09-01 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 188 npm/wk, 2.9k PyPI/wk | 11k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Gumloop
Gumloop's REST API has a public OpenAPI file with 105 operations, Markdown docs and a changelog with 28 dated releases since 9 July 2026. API keys need the $37 Pro plan, the trial needs a card, the key can travel in the URL, and self-serve content may be used to train Gumloop's models.
Microsoft Power Automate
Cloud flows in a solution are rows an agent can read and write through the Dataverse Web API under Entra ID OAuth and security roles, with published limits and a 99.9 per cent SLA. Flows under My flows can't be managed in code, a flow's body is one hand-built JSON string, and setup needs a tenant administrator.
Before you call either
Gumloop
- Send the key as
Authorization: Bearerand, for a personal key, add thex-auth-keyheader with the user ID. Do not putapi_keyin the URL - Create sessions with
POST /agents/{agent_id}/sessions, then pollGET /sessions/{session_id}. A 202 means processing or queued, and the reply is not in the response - Supply your own
session_idwhen creating a session. A repeat returns 409, which makes a retry safe - For streamed output send the same body with
stream: truetows.gumloop.com.api.gumloop.comanswers 400 to it - Treat a webhook trigger URL as a password. It returns
{"success": true}at once and never carries the agent's output
Microsoft Power Automate
- Filter
workflowsoncategory eq 5for cloud flows, and add$select, becauseclientdataholds the whole definition - Flows created through the API start with
statecode0 (off). The docs say to turn the flow on before use - Put the flow in a solution first. Flows that sit only under My flows are outside the supported API
- On 429 wait the
Retry-Afterseconds. Reads offlowrunscount against the daily Power Platform request allowance - Treat an HTTP trigger URL with
sig=as a secret, and prefer the tenant or named-user trigger modes with a bearer token forhttps://service.flow.microsoft.com/
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Gumloop or Microsoft Power Automate?
Microsoft Power Automate and Gumloop score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 62 (B) and 61.6 (C). Gumloop leads on reliability and schema & documentation.
Do Gumloop and Microsoft Power Automate need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Gumloop and Microsoft Power Automate without installing anything?
Gumloop has a hosted endpoint at https://api.gumloop.com/api/v1. No hosted endpoint is listed for Microsoft Power Automate.
Other comparisons with Gumloop or Microsoft Power Automate
- Activepieces API + MCP vs Gumloop
- Activepieces API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Gumloop vs Kestra
- Gumloop vs Make API + MCP
- Gumloop vs n8n API + MCP
- Gumloop vs Paragon ActionKit + MCP
- Gumloop vs Pipedream API + MCP
- Gumloop vs Tray.ai API + MCP
- Gumloop vs Windmill API + MCP
- Gumloop vs Workato API + MCP
- Kestra vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Make API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate
- n8n API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Paragon ActionKit + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Pipedream API + MCP vs Microsoft Power Automate
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Tray.ai API + MCP
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Windmill API + MCP
- Microsoft Power Automate vs Workato API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/gumloop-vs-power-automate.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/gumloop.json·/api/v1/tools/power-automate.json - From a terminal
anchor compare gumloop power-automate(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "gumloop", "b": "power-automate"}at/mcp, no key