Head to head · Booking availability · October 2026 research run
OpenTable APIs vs TheFork B2B API
TheFork B2B API scores 43.6 (E) on agent readiness against OpenTable APIs's 38.6 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. OpenTable APIs leads on agent ergonomics. Both do booking availability.
Best restaurant reservation and local appointment APIs for AI agents · All 36 bookings comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Approved affiliates, restaurant groups and voice AI vendors that need to book into OpenTable restaurants.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 69 against 56
Watch for
Access needs an application, review by the partnerships team and an agreement, with no self-serve credentials
Best for CRM, PMS and AI phone-agent vendors and restaurant groups that run on TheFork Manager, mainly in Europe.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 87 against 61
- Security & auth, 42 against 33
- Maintenance & community, 15 against 5
- Transparency & trust, 47 against 42
Watch for
Venue-side only. Credentials cover the restaurants that granted access, and no endpoint lists restaurants
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | OpenTable APIs | TheFork B2B API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 35 | even |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 61 | 87 | TheFork B2B API +26 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 56 | OpenTable APIs +13 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 33 | 42 | TheFork B2B API +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 5 | 5 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 5 | 15 | TheFork B2B API +10 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 42 | 47 | TheFork B2B API +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 38.6/100 | E 43.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | OpenTable APIs | TheFork B2B API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | OpenTable | TheFork (La Fourchette SAS) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://platform.opentable.com | https://api.thefork.io/manager |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth |
| Pricing | Your plan | Your plan |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under each partner's agreement with OpenTable and the Platform Policy published in the API documentation | Proprietary service under TheFork Partners API Terms of Use (La Fourchette SAS) and any core agreement with TheFork |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read |
Verdicts
OpenTable APIs
The public documentation covers diner-side and venue-side booking in detail, with slot locks, policy endpoints, error tables and an X-Request-Id header for safe retries. Access needs partner approval and a contract, rate limits and prices are not published, and the status page and main website could not be read.
TheFork B2B API
A venue-side API with a generated OpenAPI 3.1 schema, an llms.txt written for agents and nine OAuth scopes down to read-only availability. It acts for restaurants and their vendors, not diners, needs partner approval, cannot take card guarantees, and has no public status page, changelog or published prices.
Before you call either
OpenTable APIs
- Lock the slot before calling Make Reservation, since the lock and its reservation_token expire within 5 minutes
- Send a unique X-Request-Id on every POST, PUT and PATCH so a retried booking is not duplicated
- Fetch booking and cancellation policies before booking and show any deposit, hold or service fee to the diner
- Use the Consumer API for diner bookings and the In-House Booking API only for a restaurant's own voice or phone channel
- Ask the OpenTable representative for the rate limit of each endpoint before going live
TheFork B2B API
- Read hasPaymentGuaranteeRequirement in the timeslots response before booking, since the API cannot take a card
- Check the status field after creating a reservation and treat REQUESTED as unconfirmed
- Send the timeslot datetime unchanged as mealDate, because times are the restaurant's local time
- Check for an existing reservation before retrying a failed POST, as no idempotency key exists and 409 signals DOUBLE_BOOKING
- Cache the access token for its 8,600 seconds and do not request a new one while it is valid
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, OpenTable APIs or TheFork B2B API?
TheFork B2B API scores 43.6 (E) on agent readiness against OpenTable APIs's 38.6 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. OpenTable APIs leads on agent ergonomics.
Do OpenTable APIs and TheFork B2B API need an API key?
Both use an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call OpenTable APIs and TheFork B2B API without installing anything?
Yes. OpenTable APIs has a hosted endpoint at https://platform.opentable.com and TheFork B2B API at https://api.thefork.io/manager.
Other comparisons with OpenTable APIs or TheFork B2B API
- Chope vs OpenTable APIs
- Chope vs TheFork B2B API
- Eat App Partner API vs OpenTable APIs
- Eat App Partner API vs TheFork B2B API
- OpenTable APIs vs Tock
- Resy vs TheFork B2B API
- TheFork B2B API vs Tock
- OpenTable APIs vs Resy
- OpenTable APIs vs SevenRooms
- OpenTable APIs vs Square Appointments (Bookings API)
- OpenTable APIs vs TableCheck API
- Square Appointments (Bookings API) vs TheFork B2B API
- TableCheck API vs TheFork B2B API
- SevenRooms vs TheFork B2B API
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/opentable-vs-thefork.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/opentable.json·/api/v1/tools/thefork.json - From a terminal
anchor compare opentable thefork(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "opentable", "b": "thefork"}at/mcp, no key