Head to head · Notify push · October 2026 research run
OneSignal vs SuprSend
SuprSend has a score of 72.9 (BB) against OneSignal's 69.6 (B). Both do notify push. The largest gap is agent ergonomics, 23 points.
Which one, for what
Pick OneSignal for
- security & auth (+8)
- transparency & trust (+7)
Pick SuprSend for
- schema & documentation (+7)
- agent ergonomics (+23)
- payments & pricing (+5)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | OneSignal | SuprSend | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 69 | OneSignal +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 87 | 94 | SuprSend +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 64 | 87 | SuprSend +23 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 74 | 66 | OneSignal +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | SuprSend +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 81 | 81 | even |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 76 | 69 | OneSignal +7 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 69.6 · B | 72.9 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | OneSignal | SuprSend |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | OneSignal | SuprSend |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.onesignal.com | https://hub.suprsend.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Modified MIT (Node SDK, use limited to OneSignal's services) | MIT (CLI and MCP server) |
| Tools exposed | 43 | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.suprsend/cli |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-28 |
| Popularity | 52 stars, 231k npm/wk, 28k PyPI/wk | 12 stars, 13k npm/wk, 1.1k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
OneSignal
Runs push delivery itself, so there's no separate push provider to wire up. Three incidents on the API and SDK endpoints in September 2026.
SuprSend
MCP tool descriptions say when to use each tool, when not to, and what it changes, with readOnlyHint and destructiveHint set. No rate-limit page or 429 guidance.
Before you call either
OneSignal
- Use
Authorization: Key <key>, not Bearer, and putapp_idin the body - Send an
idempotency_keyUUID with every create call and reuse it on each retry - On 429, wait for
Retry-After, then back off with jitter, up to 10 attempts - Stay under 10 sends per subscribed subscription in 15 minutes or the app is disabled
- Target people with
include_aliases.external_idand settarget_channel
SuprSend
- Pass an idempotency key on each trigger. It holds for 24 hours
- Start the MCP server with
--toolsset to read-only groups for production workspaces - Register trigger tools with
--workflows=<slug>for only the workflows you need. The default registers none - Count each bulk record against the rate limit, and keep bulk calls to 100 records and 800 KB
- Treat management API responses as secrets. They include the workspace secret in plain text
Other comparisons with OneSignal or SuprSend
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/onesignal.json·/api/v1/tools/suprsend.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/onesignal-vs-suprsend.md