Nanonets-OCR2-3B vs Xiaomi-OCR-0

Nanonets-OCR2-3B 25

Model card 5, Intended use and the languages are on the card. Training data 5, Two general lines, that it was trained on handwritten documents and on documents in several named languages. Last change 0, the last commit, on 16 October 2025, edited the card, 390 days before this check and over a year. Responsiveness 0, none of the 15 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (13 October 2025 to 21 October 2026) has a reply from a nanonets member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, the earlier Nanonets-OCR-s stays in its own repository and OCR2 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older one that we read. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the Qwen2.5-VL classes. 5 + 5 + 0 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 25.

Xiaomi-OCR-0 65

The card covers intended use and parameters and misses limitations, architecture, context length, languages and a cut-off (5). Training data is described by size and labelling with no datasets named and no cut-off (5). The last change to the repository is the card commit of 29 October 2026, 6 days before this check, after the 23 October eval file deletion; card and documentation commits count on this line (20). The one question on the Hub was answered the same day by a Xiaomi Research member, and no new question has been opened since (20). It's a first release (5), and the files agree with the card (10). 5 + 5 + 20 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 65.

Nanonets-OCR2-3B 55

Memory 30, the only build from Nanonets is the BF16 safetensors files, 7.51 GB, and 7.51 GB × 1.2 = 9.0 GB, within 16 GB. No runtime library has a build. Runtimes 15, the architecture is Qwen2_5_VLForConditionalGeneration, which vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23 and Transformers 5.22.2 run from the safetensors files, three at 5 each. Builds 0, Nanonets publishes the BF16 weights only. Terms 0, no licence. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 30 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 55.

Xiaomi-OCR-0 80

Memory earns the full 30, since the only build is a 1.75 GB BF16 file that needs about 2.1 GB with the fifth added. Runtimes reach the 25 cap. The checkpoint keeps Qwen3.5's architecture, which released vLLM, SGLang, Transformers and llama.cpp run natively, and Ollama v0.40.14 pins llama.cpp b11963, which has the qwen35 architecture and the Qwen3-VL projector; LM Studio couldn't be checked. Builds score 0, as Xiaomi publishes no quantised build and every GGUF or MLX copy is someone else's. Terms get 15 for Apache 2.0 with nothing added on an Apache 2.0 base. Download gets 10 for an ungated repository, and hosted too 0, with no inference provider on 4 November and a static project Space. 30 + 25 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 80.

Nanonets-OCR2-3B 40

File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the nanonets organisation, which the card ties to nanonets.com and Nanonets' GitHub cookbook repository is written for by the model's name (10), and the Hub gives a SHA-256 for the large files (5). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, Nothing on text in a document that tries to instruct the reader, on what the model refuses or on safeguards to add. Licence risk 0, With no licence there is nothing to hold Nanonets to. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card or in the GitHub README. Our Nanonets listing found no security.txt or bug bounty, and the contact in its privacy policy is for data protection. 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 40.

Xiaomi-OCR-0 65

File safety gets 25, one safetensors file with no Python in the repository and native loading everywhere. Provenance gets 15 for files in the xiaomi-research organisation that Xiaomi's GitHub repository links, with hashes for every file, though neither organisation is verified. Licence risk keeps 15, since Apache 2.0 has none of the deductions. Agent guidance gets 5 for general cautions in Xiaomi's Skill, and the security programme 5 for Xiaomi's company security centre, carried from the 28 October reading. Safety evaluation scores 0, with no results published.