Head to head · Bank accounts · October 2026 research run
MX Platform API vs TrueLayer
MX Platform API and TrueLayer score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 62.5 (B) and 62.1 (B). TrueLayer leads on reliability and security & auth. Both do bank accounts.
Which one, for what
Good for A US or Canadian bank, credit union or fintech with a signed MX contract that wants aggregation, verification and categorised transactions plus embeddable finance widgets.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 15 against 10
- Maintenance & community, 71 against 38
Watch for
No public price, SLA or client agreement. Production keys are requested from MX in the Client Dashboard
Good for UK data and payments from one licensed vendor, with EEA coverage through the Irish entity on Data v1.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 71 against 63
- Security & auth, 66 against 60
Watch for
No public pricing anywhere on the site or in the docs
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MX Platform API | TrueLayer | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 63 | 71 | TrueLayer +8 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 89 | TrueLayer +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 74 | 73 | MX Platform API +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 66 | TrueLayer +6 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 15 | 10 | MX Platform API +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 71 | 38 | MX Platform API +33 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 62 | MX Platform API +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 62.5 · B | 62.1 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MX Platform API | TrueLayer |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | MX Technologies, Inc. | TrueLayer |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.mx.com | https://api.truelayer.com |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service. The SDKs and the OpenAPI files on GitHub are MIT | Apache-2.0 or MIT (signing libraries) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-05-12 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-05-12 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 9 stars, 2.6k npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk | 23 stars, 17k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
MX Platform API
Three public OpenAPI files, llms.txt, Markdown docs and a written version policy with 18 months of support and Deprecation and Sunset response headers. No price, client agreement or SLA is published, production keys need MX's approval, every calling IP address must be allowlisted, and the status page records three platform-wide error incidents since 10 July 2026.
TrueLayer
FCA and Central Bank of Ireland authorised, holding the AISP and PISP licences itself. No public pricing anywhere on the site or in the docs.
Before you call either
MX Platform API
- Send
Accept: application/json,Accept-Version: v20260929and Basic auth ofclient_id:api_keyon every call. A missing version returns 406 - Ask the owner to allowlist the calling machine's static IP in the Client Dashboard first. Other addresses get 403, and some failed authentication returns 404
- Test against
https://int-api.mx.comwith institutionmxbank, usernamemxuserand any password. It has no aggregation throttle - Set your own
idwhen creating users and members. A repeat returns 409, which makes a retried create safe - Expect 202 without an error when a standard aggregation is throttled (three hours by default). Balance checks stop at 5 per member every 2 hours with 429
- Pass
includes[]=merchantorincludes[]=categoryas an array on transaction lists. A comma-separated string returns 400
TrueLayer
- Use auth.truelayer-sandbox.com and api.truelayer-sandbox.com with a separate sandbox client; live credentials don't work there
- Send the user's IP when they're present, or a bank allows 4 calls a day per account
- Check the retry column of the Data API error table before retrying; codes marked No need the user or a config fix
- Set data_access_type to one_time for a single read and skip the 90-day reauthorisation
- Append .md to any docs URL to get the page as Markdown
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MX Platform API or TrueLayer?
MX Platform API and TrueLayer score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 62.5 (B) and 62.1 (B). TrueLayer leads on reliability and security & auth.
Do MX Platform API and TrueLayer need an API key?
MX Platform API needs an API key. TrueLayer uses an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call MX Platform API and TrueLayer without installing anything?
Yes. MX Platform API has a hosted endpoint at https://api.mx.com and TrueLayer at https://api.truelayer.com.
Other comparisons with MX Platform API or TrueLayer
- Akoya vs MX Platform API
- Akoya vs TrueLayer
- Belvo vs MX Platform API
- Belvo vs TrueLayer
- Enable Banking vs MX Platform API
- Enable Banking vs TrueLayer
- Flinks vs MX Platform API
- Flinks vs TrueLayer
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs MX Platform API
- GoCardless Bank Account Data vs TrueLayer
- MX Platform API vs Plaid
- MX Platform API vs Salt Edge Account Information
- MX Platform API vs Teller
- MX Platform API vs Tink
- MX Platform API vs Yapily
- Plaid vs TrueLayer
- Salt Edge Account Information vs TrueLayer
- Teller vs TrueLayer
- Tink vs TrueLayer
- TrueLayer vs Yapily
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/mx-vs-truelayer.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/mx.json·/api/v1/tools/truelayer.json - From a terminal
anchor compare mx truelayer(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "mx", "b": "truelayer"}at/mcp, no key