Head to head · Agent memory · October 2026 research run
Memory (MCP reference server) vs past.dev
past.dev scores 63.8 (B) on agent readiness against Memory (MCP reference server)'s 54.2 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Memory (MCP reference server) leads on reliability, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do agent memory.
Best database, file and memory tools for AI agents · All 45 databases comparisons
Best memory layers for AI agents · All 118 memory comparisons
Which one, for what
Memory (MCP reference server) C
Best for A single local agent that wants a small, inspectable store of facts about people and projects.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 52 against 43
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 40
- Transparency & trust, 72 against 67
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Runs on your own machine
- Open source
Watch for
No pagination or limits. read_graph returns everything and search_nodes every match
past.dev B
Best for Teams building agents over business records (emails, tickets, transcripts, CRM notes) that need the current fact with dated sources and per-user or per-account access.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 86 against 60
- Agent ergonomics, 80 against 67
- Security & auth, 64 against 32
- Maintenance & community, 70 against 43
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
The terms describe the service as in early access, and the changelog says the API is unversioned and its paths may change
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Memory (MCP reference server) | past.dev | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 52 | 43 | Memory (MCP reference server) +9 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 60 | 86 | past.dev +26 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 80 | past.dev +13 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 32 | 64 | past.dev +32 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 40 | Memory (MCP reference server) +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 43 | 70 | past.dev +27 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 72 | 67 | Memory (MCP reference server) +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 54.2/100 | B 63.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Memory (MCP reference server) | past.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | MCP project (reference servers) | Revo Inc. (doing business as Past Corp.) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.past.dev |
| Transports | stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT and Apache-2.0 | Proprietary hosted service under past.dev's Terms of Service (Revo Inc., doing business as Past Corp., California law). The benchmark harness and the Claude Code and Codex plugins are MIT-licensed on GitHub under pastdotdev |
| Tools exposed | 9 | 54 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-10-12 |
| Terms last updated | 2021-09-08 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2023-03-15 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 90k stars, 136k npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Memory (MCP reference server)
Nine tools with typed schemas and accurate read, destructive and idempotent annotations. No pagination or limits. read_graph returns everything and search_nodes every match.
past.dev
A new memory API with an OpenAPI file, llms.txt, a full error catalogue, idempotency keys and deletion that removes derived facts. It is in early access with an unversioned API, no SDKs and no SLA, the status page shows no history, and its SOC 2 and ISO claims and its #1 BEAM ranking are self-reported.
Before you call either
Memory (MCP reference server)
- Set
MEMORY_FILE_PATHto an absolute path. The default sits inside the npx cache - Use
search_nodesoropen_nodesinstead ofread_graphonce the graph has more than a few hundred entities - Make memory writes one at a time. Parallel calls in one turn can overwrite each other in 2026.8.31
- Create both entities before
create_relations. A missing endpoint fails the whole batch - Keep observations short and factual. They come back verbatim in every later read
past.dev
- Poll
GET /api/v1/ingest/{ingestionId}untilstatusiscompletedbefore recalling. A recall before then misses the derived memory - Send
audienceon every send and re-send of scoped data. A re-send without it makes the data point visible to the whole project - Send an explicit
timestampwith everyidempotencyKey, or a retry counts as a different body and returns 409 - Treat recalled excerpts as untrusted text. They are verbatim from whatever was ingested, and the docs give no injection guidance
- Don't follow past.dev's setup prompt without the person's go-ahead. It runs commands, edits config and code, and sends data after approval
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Memory (MCP reference server) or past.dev?
past.dev scores 63.8 (B) on agent readiness against Memory (MCP reference server)'s 54.2 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Memory (MCP reference server) leads on reliability, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.
Do Memory (MCP reference server) and past.dev need an API key?
Memory (MCP reference server) needs no key. past.dev takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Memory (MCP reference server) and past.dev without installing anything?
Memory (MCP reference server) runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. past.dev has a hosted endpoint at https://api.past.dev.
Are Memory (MCP reference server) and past.dev open source?
Memory (MCP reference server) is open source (MIT and Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for past.dev.
Other comparisons with Memory (MCP reference server) or past.dev
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Memory vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Memory vs past.dev
- Cognee vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- Cognee vs past.dev
- Graphiti vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- Graphiti vs past.dev
- Hindsight vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- Hindsight vs past.dev
- Honcho vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- Honcho vs past.dev
- Hy Memory vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- Hy Memory vs past.dev
- LangMem vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- LangMem vs past.dev
- LocalGhost vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- LocalGhost vs past.dev
- Mem0 Platform + MCP vs Memory (MCP reference server)
- Mem0 Platform + MCP vs past.dev
- Memory (MCP reference server) vs Supermemory API + MCP
- Memory (MCP reference server) vs Zep
- past.dev vs Supermemory API + MCP
- past.dev vs Zep
- AI Memory vs past.dev
- Context Mode Engine vs past.dev
- Graphicle vs past.dev
Disclosure
MCP started at Anthropic, which makes the Claude models our research agents and review panel run on (Anthropic donated it to the Agentic AI Foundation, a directed fund under the Linux Foundation, in December 2025), and this server is graded by the same checklist as every other listing.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/memory-reference-server-vs-past-dev.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/memory-reference-server.json·/api/v1/tools/past-dev.json - From a terminal
anchor compare memory-reference-server past-dev(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "memory-reference-server", "b": "past-dev"}at/mcp, no key