Head to head · FHIR servers · October 2026 research run

Medplum vs Metriport Medical API

Medplum scores 68.7 (B) on agent readiness against Metriport Medical API's 50.1 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do fhir servers.

Best health record and wellness data APIs for AI agents · All 63 health comparisons

Which one, for what

Medplum B

Best for An agent working inside a digital health company's own FHIR store, reading and writing patients, observations and appointments under a BAA.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 75 against 45
  • Schema & documentation, 82 against 65
  • Security & auth, 74 against 41
  • Payments & pricing, 25 against 5
  • Maintenance & community, 93 against 74
  • Transparency & trust, 72 against 56

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

The MCP fhir-request tool can delete or overwrite any resource the token allows, with no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint

Metriport Medical API D

Best for US care providers and digital health companies that need a patient's network records as FHIR with webhooks.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

Every API key has full access, including destructive operations, with no scopes

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMedplumMetriport Medical APIEdge
Reliability16%207545Medplum +30
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28265Medplum +17
Agent ergonomics13%16.27370Medplum +3
Security & auth14%17.57441Medplum +33
Payments & pricing10%12.5255Medplum +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.89374Medplum +19
Transparency & trust7%8.87256Medplum +16
Negative events≤15-20
TotalB 68.7/100D 50.1/100

Facts side by side

FactMedplumMetriport Medical API
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorOrangebot, Inc. (dba Medplum)Metriport Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://api.medplum.com/mcp/streamno (local only)
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)HTTP
AuthOAuthAPI key
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
LicenceApache 2.0 for the server, SDKs and apps in medplum/medplum. The hosted service at api.medplum.com runs under Medplum's terms of serviceProprietary hosted service under Metriport's terms of use. The source in metriport/metriport is AGPLv3, with an enterprise directory under its own licence, and the @metriport/api-sdk package on npm is MIT
Tools exposed3none
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrycom.medplum/mcpnot listed
Last release2026-10-082026-09-28
Terms last updated2023-04-112024-01-01
Privacy policy last updated2022-04-052023-02-21
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyesyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryesyes
Popularity2.7k stars, 270k npm/wk793 stars, 28k npm/wk

Verdicts

Medplum

Graded on the hosted FHIR API at api.medplum.com. Rate limits, a RateLimit header and a 99.99 per cent SLA are published, AccessPolicy resources allow read-only clients, and an official MCP server sits in the registry. Its main tool can delete records with no annotation, the status page could not be read, and the privacy policy dates from 2022.

Metriport Medical API

One network query pulls a patient's records from HIEs, pharmacies and labs and returns deduplicated FHIR, with per-operation rate limits, RFC 7807 errors and AGPLv3 source. Each API key has full access with no scopes, there are no public prices, and the sandbox opens only after Metriport approves the account.

Before you call either

Medplum

  1. Use a ClientApplication with an AccessPolicy limited to the resources the task needs, and set readonly where no writes are needed
  2. Read the RateLimit header and wait for the reset time after a 429. Writes cost 100 quota points, searches 20 and reads 1
  3. Create patients with conditional create (If-None-Exist) or upsert on an identifier so a retry doesn't make a duplicate
  4. Pass paths to fhir-request relative to the FHIR R4 base, with no leading slash or /fhir/R4 prefix
  5. Use Prefer: respond-async for large bundles. Operations inside the background job don't count against the quota

Metriport Medical API

  1. Check the errors array after Start Network Query. It returns 2XX even when some sources fail
  2. Wait for network-query.* webhooks or poll Get Network Query Status before reading consolidated data, which is cached from the last query
  3. Send the resource's eTag in If-Match on updates to avoid overwriting newer data
  4. Keep patient creates under 15 a minute and network queries under 20 a minute per source
  5. In sandbox, create patients whose first name matches a pre-defined persona to get example records

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Medplum or Metriport Medical API?

Medplum scores 68.7 (B) on agent readiness against Metriport Medical API's 50.1 (D), and leads in every scored category.

Do Medplum and Metriport Medical API need an API key?

Medplum uses an OAuth sign-in. Metriport Medical API needs an API key.

Can an agent call Medplum and Metriport Medical API without installing anything?

Medplum has a hosted endpoint at https://api.medplum.com/mcp/stream. No hosted endpoint is listed for Metriport Medical API.

Are Medplum and Metriport Medical API open source?

Yes. Medplum is open source (Apache 2.0 for the server, SDKs and apps in medplum/medplum. The hosted service at api.medplum.com runs under Medplum's terms of service). Metriport Medical API is open source (Proprietary hosted service under Metriport's terms of use. The source in metriport/metriport is AGPLv3, with an enterprise directory under its own licence, and the @metriport/api-sdk package on npm is MIT).

Other comparisons with Medplum or Metriport Medical API

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.