Head to head · FHIR servers · October 2026 research run
Medplum vs Metriport Medical API
Medplum scores 68.7 (B) on agent readiness against Metriport Medical API's 50.1 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do fhir servers.
Best health record and wellness data APIs for AI agents · All 63 health comparisons
Which one, for what
Medplum B
Best for An agent working inside a digital health company's own FHIR store, reading and writing patients, observations and appointments under a BAA.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 75 against 45
- Schema & documentation, 82 against 65
- Security & auth, 74 against 41
- Payments & pricing, 25 against 5
- Maintenance & community, 93 against 74
- Transparency & trust, 72 against 56
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
The MCP fhir-request tool can delete or overwrite any resource the token allows, with no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint
Best for US care providers and digital health companies that need a patient's network records as FHIR with webhooks.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Every API key has full access, including destructive operations, with no scopes
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Medplum | Metriport Medical API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 75 | 45 | Medplum +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 82 | 65 | Medplum +17 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 73 | 70 | Medplum +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 74 | 41 | Medplum +33 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 25 | 5 | Medplum +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 93 | 74 | Medplum +19 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 72 | 56 | Medplum +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | B 68.7/100 | D 50.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Medplum | Metriport Medical API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Orangebot, Inc. (dba Medplum) | Metriport Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.medplum.com/mcp/stream | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache 2.0 for the server, SDKs and apps in medplum/medplum. The hosted service at api.medplum.com runs under Medplum's terms of service | Proprietary hosted service under Metriport's terms of use. The source in metriport/metriport is AGPLv3, with an enterprise directory under its own licence, and the @metriport/api-sdk package on npm is MIT |
| Tools exposed | 3 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | com.medplum/mcp | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-09-28 |
| Terms last updated | 2023-04-11 | 2024-01-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2022-04-05 | 2023-02-21 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Popularity | 2.7k stars, 270k npm/wk | 793 stars, 28k npm/wk |
Verdicts
Medplum
Graded on the hosted FHIR API at api.medplum.com. Rate limits, a RateLimit header and a 99.99 per cent SLA are published, AccessPolicy resources allow read-only clients, and an official MCP server sits in the registry. Its main tool can delete records with no annotation, the status page could not be read, and the privacy policy dates from 2022.
Metriport Medical API
One network query pulls a patient's records from HIEs, pharmacies and labs and returns deduplicated FHIR, with per-operation rate limits, RFC 7807 errors and AGPLv3 source. Each API key has full access with no scopes, there are no public prices, and the sandbox opens only after Metriport approves the account.
Before you call either
Medplum
- Use a ClientApplication with an AccessPolicy limited to the resources the task needs, and set
readonlywhere no writes are needed - Read the
RateLimitheader and wait for the reset time after a 429. Writes cost 100 quota points, searches 20 and reads 1 - Create patients with conditional create (
If-None-Exist) or upsert on an identifier so a retry doesn't make a duplicate - Pass paths to
fhir-requestrelative to the FHIR R4 base, with no leading slash or/fhir/R4prefix - Use
Prefer: respond-asyncfor large bundles. Operations inside the background job don't count against the quota
Metriport Medical API
- Check the
errorsarray after Start Network Query. It returns 2XX even when some sources fail - Wait for
network-query.*webhooks or poll Get Network Query Status before reading consolidated data, which is cached from the last query - Send the resource's
eTaginIf-Matchon updates to avoid overwriting newer data - Keep patient creates under 15 a minute and network queries under 20 a minute per source
- In sandbox, create patients whose first name matches a pre-defined persona to get example records
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Medplum or Metriport Medical API?
Medplum scores 68.7 (B) on agent readiness against Metriport Medical API's 50.1 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Do Medplum and Metriport Medical API need an API key?
Medplum uses an OAuth sign-in. Metriport Medical API needs an API key.
Can an agent call Medplum and Metriport Medical API without installing anything?
Medplum has a hosted endpoint at https://api.medplum.com/mcp/stream. No hosted endpoint is listed for Metriport Medical API.
Are Medplum and Metriport Medical API open source?
Yes. Medplum is open source (Apache 2.0 for the server, SDKs and apps in medplum/medplum. The hosted service at api.medplum.com runs under Medplum's terms of service). Metriport Medical API is open source (Proprietary hosted service under Metriport's terms of use. The source in metriport/metriport is AGPLv3, with an enterprise directory under its own licence, and the @metriport/api-sdk package on npm is MIT).
Other comparisons with Medplum or Metriport Medical API
- Aidbox vs Medplum
- Aidbox vs Metriport Medical API
- Medplum vs Particle Health
- Medplum vs Redox
- Medplum vs ROOK
- Medplum vs Terra API
- Medplum vs Zus Health
- Metriport Medical API vs ROOK
- Metriport Medical API vs Terra API
- 1upHealth vs Medplum
- 1upHealth vs Metriport Medical API
- Health Gorilla vs Medplum
- Health Gorilla vs Metriport Medical API
- Medblocks vs Medplum
- Medblocks vs Metriport Medical API
- Metriport Medical API vs Particle Health
- Metriport Medical API vs Redox
- Metriport Medical API vs Zus Health
- Metriport Medical API vs Validic Inform
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/medplum-vs-metriport.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/medplum.json·/api/v1/tools/metriport.json - From a terminal
anchor compare medplum metriport(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "medplum", "b": "metriport"}at/mcp, no key