Head to head · Geocoding · October 2026 research run

MapQuest vs Radar

Radar scores 53.3 (D) on agent readiness against MapQuest's 35.1 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. MapQuest leads on payments & pricing. Both do geocoding.

Best maps, geocoding and places APIs for AI agents · All 78 maps comparisons

Which one, for what

MapQuest F

Good for An agent that needs US-centred geocoding, routing with truck profiles, traffic and place search behind one account, with an MCP server ready to connect.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 10

Watch for

No API terms of service found. The legal link leads to System1's 2021 website terms, which allow personal, non-commercial use only

Radar D

Good for A company that already has a Radar contract, or wants geofencing and trip tracking with geocoding and routing on one key.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 70 against 23
  • Agent ergonomics, 65 against 60
  • Security & auth, 56 against 28
  • Maintenance & community, 77 against 23
  • Transparency & trust, 55 against 28

Watch for

The pricing page says Radar has no free tier and every plan is an annual commitment set by quote

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMapQuestRadarEdge
Reliability16%202370Radar +47
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24750Radar +3
Agent ergonomics13%16.26065Radar +5
Security & auth14%17.52856Radar +28
Payments & pricing10%12.53010MapQuest +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.82377Radar +54
Transparency & trust7%8.82855Radar +27
Negative events≤150-2
Total35.1 · F53.3 · D

Facts side by side

FactMapQuestRadar
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorMapQuest (System1)Radar Labs
Hosted endpointhttps://www.mapquestapi.comhttps://api.radar.io/v1
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingPay per usePaid
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service. No API terms were found published without a loginProprietary service under Radar's Terms of Use. The web SDK in radarlabs/radar-sdk-js is Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-07-162026-09-14
Terms last updatedno document linked2023-05-24
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2025-05-13
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes

Verdicts

MapQuest

One account reaches geocoding, routing, place search and traffic through a REST API or a hosted MCP server with OAuth, at a published $0.0045 a transaction. No API terms, status page, changelog or product OpenAPI spec was found, and REST keys travel in the query string.

Radar

Radar documents 36 REST operations in Markdown with a rate limit on each, and its status feed shows two short API incidents in 90 days. Access is sales-led. The pricing page says there is no free tier, every plan is an annual commitment, and no OpenAPI description or API changelog was found.

Before you call either

MapQuest

  1. Register an account and create an API key before connecting the MCP server. Every tool needs an active key, chosen by nickname on first use
  2. Send REST calls to https://www.mapquestapi.com with key in the query string, and redact it from logged URLs
  3. Read info.statuscode in geocoding and directions responses. 0 is success, and errors such as 610 (ambiguous location) arrive in the body
  4. Set thumbMaps=false and maxResults on geocoding, and pageSize (1 to 50) on place search, to keep responses small
  5. Do not store or cache geocodes on a monthly or pay-as-you-go plan

Radar

  1. Send the key in the Authorization header with no Bearer prefix, and call https://api.radar.io/v1, not radar.com
  2. Use a publishable key for geocoding, search and routing. Keep the secret key for users, trips, geofences and beacons
  3. Call /v1/search/autocomplete for partial addresses and place names. /v1/geocode/forward is documented as best for complete addresses
  4. Set units=metric on routing calls. The default is imperial, with distances in feet
  5. Treat 429 as one of three things (rate limit, no state change or selective throttling) and 402 as usage exceeded. No Retry-After header is documented
  6. Do not keep geocoding, autocomplete or place results for more than 30 days

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, MapQuest or Radar?

Radar scores 53.3 (D) on agent readiness against MapQuest's 35.1 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. MapQuest leads on payments & pricing.

Do MapQuest and Radar need an API key?

MapQuest takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Radar needs an API key.

Can an agent call MapQuest and Radar without installing anything?

Yes. MapQuest has a hosted endpoint at https://www.mapquestapi.com and Radar at https://api.radar.io/v1.

Other comparisons with MapQuest or Radar

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.