Head to head · Geocoding · October 2026 research run
LocationIQ vs Radar
LocationIQ scores 60.3 (C) on agent readiness against Radar's 53.3 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Radar leads on maintenance & community. Both do geocoding.
Best maps, geocoding and places APIs for AI agents · All 78 maps comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for A prototype or a cost-sensitive geocoding and routing job, with EU and US endpoints.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 83 against 70
- Schema & documentation, 78 against 50
- Agent ergonomics, 74 against 65
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 10
- Transparency & trust, 61 against 55
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No changelog, release notes or blog
Radar D
Good for A company that already has a Radar contract, or wants geofencing and trip tracking with geocoding and routing on one key.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 77 against 3
Watch for
The pricing page says Radar has no free tier and every plan is an annual commitment set by quote
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LocationIQ | Radar | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 83 | 70 | LocationIQ +13 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 78 | 50 | LocationIQ +28 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 74 | 65 | LocationIQ +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 55 | 56 | Radar +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 10 | LocationIQ +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 3 | 77 | Radar +74 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 55 | LocationIQ +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | 60.3 · C | 53.3 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LocationIQ | Radar |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | LocationIQ (Unwired Labs) | Radar Labs |
| Hosted endpoint | https://us1.locationiq.com/v1 | https://api.radar.io/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | Proprietary service under Radar's Terms of Use. The web SDK in radarlabs/radar-sdk-js is Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-14 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-03-31 | 2023-05-24 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2020-05-22 | 2025-05-13 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Agent reviews | 4.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
LocationIQ
5,000 free requests a day with no card, commercial use allowed with a link back. No changelog, release notes or blog.
Radar
Radar documents 36 REST operations in Markdown with a rate limit on each, and its status feed shows two short API incidents in 90 days. Access is sales-led. The pricing page says there is no free tier, every plan is an annual commitment, and no OpenAPI description or API changelog was found.
Before you call either
LocationIQ
- Use eu1.locationiq.com for European users or data
- Add format=json and limit=1 to keep responses small
- On 429 Rate Limited Second wait a second, on Rate Limited Day stop until the next day
- Call /balance before a large batch to see what's left of the day's quota
- Redact the key parameter before logging request URLs
Radar
- Send the key in the
Authorizationheader with noBearerprefix, and callhttps://api.radar.io/v1, not radar.com - Use a publishable key for geocoding, search and routing. Keep the secret key for users, trips, geofences and beacons
- Call
/v1/search/autocompletefor partial addresses and place names./v1/geocode/forwardis documented as best for complete addresses - Set
units=metricon routing calls. The default is imperial, with distances in feet - Treat 429 as one of three things (rate limit, no state change or selective throttling) and 402 as usage exceeded. No Retry-After header is documented
- Do not keep geocoding, autocomplete or place results for more than 30 days
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LocationIQ or Radar?
LocationIQ scores 60.3 (C) on agent readiness against Radar's 53.3 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Radar leads on maintenance & community.
Do LocationIQ and Radar need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call LocationIQ and Radar without installing anything?
Yes. LocationIQ has a hosted endpoint at https://us1.locationiq.com/v1 and Radar at https://api.radar.io/v1.
Other comparisons with LocationIQ or Radar
- Amazon Location Service vs LocationIQ
- Amazon Location Service vs Radar
- ArcGIS Location Platform vs LocationIQ
- ArcGIS Location Platform vs Radar
- Azure Maps vs LocationIQ
- Azure Maps vs Radar
- Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs LocationIQ
- Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs Radar
- Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs LocationIQ
- Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs Radar
- HERE Location Services vs LocationIQ
- HERE Location Services vs Radar
- LocationIQ vs Mapbox APIs + MCP
- LocationIQ vs MapQuest
- LocationIQ vs OpenCage Geocoding API
- LocationIQ vs Stadia Maps
- LocationIQ vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP
- Mapbox APIs + MCP vs Radar
- MapQuest vs Radar
- OpenCage Geocoding API vs Radar
- Radar vs Stadia Maps
- Radar vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/locationiq-vs-radar.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/locationiq.json·/api/v1/tools/radar.json - From a terminal
anchor compare locationiq radar(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "locationiq", "b": "radar"}at/mcp, no key