Head to head · Email send · October 2026 research run
Mailgun API + MCP vs Resend API + MCP
Resend API + MCP has a score of 75.3 (BB) against Mailgun API + MCP's 66.3 (B). Both do email send. The largest gap is reliability, 28 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Mailgun API + MCP for
- security & auth (+9)
Pick Resend API + MCP for
- reliability (+28)
- schema & documentation (+12)
- agent ergonomics (+7)
- maintenance & community (+6)
- transparency & trust (+15)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Mailgun API + MCP | Resend API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 57 | 85 | Resend API + MCP +28 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 83 | 95 | Resend API + MCP +12 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 60 | 67 | Resend API + MCP +7 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 74 | 65 | Mailgun API + MCP +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 40 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 87 | 93 | Resend API + MCP +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 70 | 85 | Resend API + MCP +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 66.3 · B | 75.3 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Mailgun API + MCP | Resend API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Mailgun (Sinch) | Resend |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.mailgun.net/v3 | https://api.resend.com |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 74 | 106 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-29 |
| Popularity | 62 stars, 1.3M npm/wk, 61k PyPI/wk | 575 stars, 13.6M npm/wk, 2.8M PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3.4/5 (8) |
Verdicts
Mailgun API + MCP
Key roles (Admin, read-only Analyst, Developer, Support), Domain Sending Keys and IP allowlisting. 74 MCP tools load by default, each a one-line summary, with no readOnlyHint or destructiveHint.
Resend API + MCP
Idempotency-Key on POST /emails and /emails/batch, kept for 24 hours. 106 MCP tools load at once, with no toolsets.
Before you call either
Mailgun API + MCP
- Give an agent that only sends a Domain Sending Key, which can only POST /messages for one domain
- Start the MCP with
--tags validate,inspectwhen you don't need the 70 send-tagged tools - Set
MAILGUN_API_REGION=eufor EU accounts, which live on api.eu.mailgun.net - Add
o:testmode=yesto check a send without delivering it - Verify a custom domain first. The sandbox domain reaches only 5 authorised recipients
Resend API + MCP
- Send an
Idempotency-Keyon POST /emails so a retry after a timeout doesn't send twice - Send a User-Agent header on raw HTTP calls or you'll get a 403
- Give the agent a
sending_accesskey limited to one domain unless it has to manage the account - On 429, wait for
retry-after, and use /emails/batch to stay under 10 requests a second - Verify a domain before sending to anyone but your own address
Other comparisons with Mailgun API + MCP or Resend API + MCP
- Amazon SES vs Mailgun API + MCP
- Amazon SES vs Resend API + MCP
- Brevo API + MCP vs Mailgun API + MCP
- Brevo API + MCP vs Resend API + MCP
- Loops API + MCP vs Mailgun API + MCP
- Loops API + MCP vs Resend API + MCP
- Mailgun API + MCP vs Mailjet API + MCP
- Mailgun API + MCP vs Postmark API + MCP
- Mailgun API + MCP vs Twilio SendGrid
- Mailgun API + MCP vs SMTP2GO API + MCP
- Mailjet API + MCP vs Resend API + MCP
- Postmark API + MCP vs Resend API + MCP
- Resend API + MCP vs Twilio SendGrid
- Resend API + MCP vs SMTP2GO API + MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/mailgun.json·/api/v1/tools/resend.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/mailgun-vs-resend.md