Head to head · Research search · October 2026 research run

Liner Search MCP vs SpecStream

SpecStream scores 64.4 (B) on agent readiness against Liner Search MCP's 43.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Liner Search MCP leads on reliability. Both do research search. SpecStream accepts x402. Liner Search MCP doesn't.

Best web search APIs for AI agents · All 326 search comparisons

Which one, for what

Liner Search MCP E

Best for Agents that need cheap cited search across the web and scholarly sources, with optional deep research reports.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 50 against 23

Watch for

No free tier found

SpecStream B

Best for Agents that need a list of companies, places, grants, tenders, papers or packages matching stated conditions, with a source page on every value and a price approved before anything runs, and teams that want the same list rechecked on a schedule and sent to a sheet or CRM.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 80 against 45
  • Security & auth, 73 against 35
  • Payments & pricing, 85 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 81 against 45
  • Transparency & trust, 66 against 34

Also in its favour

  • An agent can pay per call over x402, with no account
  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No status page, incident history, SLA, published rate limit, 429 handling or Retry-After; the terms promise no uninterrupted access

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Payments & pricing SpecStream +65

Liner Search MCP 20

No machine payment protocol (0). Per-call prices public (20). No free tier found (0). A person signs up in a browser for OAuth or an API key (0). 0 + 20 + 0 + 0 = 20.

SpecStream 85

x402 v2 (USDC on Base, Arbitrum or Polygon, Permit2 upto for the quoted maximum, settled for the results cost) and MPP by card on SpecStream's own POST /v1/agent/lists, the route for buying a list of 1 to 500 results without an account; enrichment of imported lists, refreshes, monitors and investigations need an account, and the route was read in the docs and not exercised because api.specstream.ai's robots.txt could not be read, so partial (25). Per-result prices published without a login, 5, 15 or 100 cents a result, 5 cents an email, 15 cents a phone, rechecks at half rate or 1 cent (20). $10 of work for 30 days with no card (20). An agent can buy a list over x402 or MPP with no account, and the A2A endpoint prices a request without a key (20). 25+20+20+20 = 85.

Security & auth SpecStream +38

Liner Search MCP 35

OAuth 2.1 or an API key; scopes not published (20 of 30). All tools are reads (10 of 20). Results carry web pages and documents with no injection guidance (0). No audit log found (0). No security.txt (404) or security programme found (5 of 20). 20 + 10 + 0 + 0 + 5 = 35.

SpecStream 73

API keys ss_live_... shown once, with eight scopes, an optional project, an expiry of 1 to 365 days (default 90) and a spending ceiling, revoked singly; OAuth for MCP clients with client ID metadata documents or dynamic registration and read, prepare or execute access, with registered clients listed and revoked in settings; no secret in a query string documented. The authorisation server metadata on api.specstream.ai was not read and rotation is not described beyond expiry (28 of 30). Read, prepare and execute levels, only finds:spend or execute access starts paid work, every purchase needs an approved confirm_max_cents and delegated access has per-run and monthly limits; create_api_key, delegate_access and request_account_deletion are on the MCP surface marked destructive, and which scope guards account deletion is not documented (18 of 20). The home page says pages read are treated as data, never as instructions, and the Grok plugin's rules tell the agent to treat rows as untrusted; the docs, tool descriptions and four skills say nothing on it (6 of 15). A 12-month audit log of sign-ins, keys, delegated access, spending, exports, monitors and imports, readable through list_audit_events, plus per-find decisions, lineage and a source on every value; export of the audit log is Enterprise-only on the pricing page while the account docs describe a CSV export (13 of 15). security.txt is valid until October 2027 with support@specstream.ai, and SECURITY.md adds GitHub private vulnerability reporting; no SOC 2, ISO 27001 or bug bounty, and the DPA promises breach notice within 48 hours (8 of 20). 28+18+6+13+8 = 73.

Maintenance & community SpecStream +36

Liner Search MCP 45

Registry entry com.liner/search last updated 11 September 2026 (20). No dated changelog found (0). Support page linked from the docs (10 of 15). Official registry entry under its own namespace (15). No package to read (0). 20 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 0 = 45. Registry presence read from Anchor Terminal's own daily import of the official MCP registry (/api/v1/registry.json, 6 November 2026), not the registry's API.

SpecStream 81

specstream-mcp-stdio 1.2.3 on PyPI on 3 November 2026, the Python SDK 1.2.0 committed the same day and @specstream/sdk 1.2.0 on npm on 31 October (30). Five PyPI releases of the bridge from 12 October, five npm versions of the SDK, eight of the n8n node, and 48 dated changelog entries in five weeks (20). A closed service with a dated changelog, support@specstream.ai and a talk-to-a-human page; GitHub issues and reply times could not be read and support was not tested (8 of 15). server.json under the reverse-DNS namespace ai.specstream/specstream 1.3.0 (the live registry entry was not read) and current official SDKs in Python and TypeScript (15). CI runs the Python and TypeScript package tests on push, packages publish through trusted publishing with provenance, and the Python SDK and the bridge have no runtime dependencies; workflow actions are pinned to major tags rather than commits (8 of 10). 30+20+8+15+8 = 81.

Schema & documentation SpecStream +35

Liner Search MCP 45

Tool schemas not read without sign-in (15 of 25). llms.txt (10). A table says which tool fits which need, and that the domain tools return the same shape as search_web (12 of 20). Inputs not verifiable (3 of 15). Setup examples, no error responses (5 of 15). Registry version 1.0.0 since 11 September; no changelog found (0). 15 + 10 + 12 + 3 + 5 + 0 = 45.

SpecStream 80

MCP reading, with the REST API described. The tool list shipped in specstream-mcp-stdio 1.2.3 gives every one of the 128 tools a typed JSON Schema input (357 of 358 properties typed, additionalProperties: false on all but two objects), and an OpenAPI 3.1 file at https://specstream.ai/openapi.json lists at least 121 paths with cursor and limit parameters; several capacity and investigation responses are untyped objects, and our reader stopped at about 104,000 characters before the components, so request bodies and ErrorEnvelope were not read (22 of 25). llms.txt, llms-full.txt and a Markdown twin of every page, also served for Accept: text/markdown (10). Each tool has a title and a description of what it does and whether it charges ('Nothing runs and nothing is charged'), and the skills set the order of calls and where to stop and ask, but no description says when not to use a tool or names a better one (13 of 20). 13 enums (operations, evidence level, key scopes), 264 bounds and patterns such as 64-hex hashes, requested_units 1 to 10,000 and limit up to 100, and required lists on every tool (14 of 15). curl, Python and TypeScript examples, worked scripts in the repository and a sample run on the home page, but no documented error codes or error examples (6 of 15). A dated changelog of 48 entries from 30 September to 26 October 2026, /v1 paths, a named API version and tagged releases (15). 22+10+13+14+6+15 = 80.

Transparency & trust SpecStream +32

Liner Search MCP 34

Terms and privacy linked from the docs but not read in this batch (5 of 30). Data handling not read (5 of 30). No deprecation policy found for the MCP server; the docs note older endpoints priced per version (5 of 20). Subprocessors not read (5 of 20). 5 + 5 + 5 + 5 = 20.

SpecStream 66

Closed hosted service under terms of 3 November 2026 naming SpecStream SAS, French law and a liability cap of the greater of 12 months' fees or 100 euros; the client code is MIT (20 of 30). The privacy policy and DPA agree with each other and the about page on EU hosting, no training on customer requests, lists or results, and a retention table (server logs 30 days, backups 8 days, page copies 24 hours, run working copies 7 days, audit log 12 months, support 3 years, accounts until deleted, erased from backups within 8 days of deletion), with breach notice in 48 hours and audit rights; the pricing page and the account docs disagree on who can export the audit log (27 of 30). No API deprecation policy; the changelog dates a price cut of 26 October 2026 that kept approved quotes at their old prices, the terms promise notice of material changes and keep historical quotes on their terms, and the DPA gives 30 days' notice of a new subprocessor (8 of 20). Subprocessors are listed by category with locations and transfer safeguards, hosting on IBM Cloud in Madrid is named in the legal notice, and names are available only on request (12 of 20). 20+27+8+12 = 67.

Reliability Liner Search MCP +27

Liner Search MCP 50

incident.io status page at status.liner.com with components for liner.com and app.liner.com only, none for the API or MCP (15). 100% uptime shown since August (20, no incidents shown). Rate limits published per API with numbers (Scholar Search 2 requests a second, agents 2 a second) (15). 429 with a code for concurrency limits, no Retry-After or backoff guidance found (0 of 15). No SLA found (0). Not labelled beta (0 of 10; 'limits may be adjusted over time', GA not stated). 15 + 20 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 50.

SpecStream 23

Hosted reading, for the MCP server and REST API on api.specstream.ai. No public status page was found. None is linked from the site, llms.txt or the docs, llms-full.txt mentions none, and https://specstream.ai/status returned an error (0). No readable incident history, so the floor (5). No rate limit with numbers is published in the docs, llms.txt, llms-full.txt or the part of the OpenAPI file read; the privacy policy and DPA mention rate limiting without figures, and the published limits are per job (10,000 results a request, four-hour runs, 20,000 imported rows) (0). Nothing documents 429, Retry-After or backoff, but paid work requires an idempotency_key on authorize_capacity_work and POST /v1/capacity/executions, GET /v1/capacity/requests/{request_key} recovers the original find after an uncertain response, and the skills say never to quote again to recover a lost reply (8 of 15). No SLA on any plan, and the terms say 'We do not promise uninterrupted access' (0). No beta or preview label on the API, the MCP server or the SDKs, which PyPI classifies as production and stable at 1.2 (10). 0+5+0+8+0+10 = 23.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLiner Search MCPSpecStreamEdge
Reliability16%205023Liner Search MCP +27
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24580SpecStream +35
Agent ergonomics13%16.26565even
Security & auth14%17.53573SpecStream +38
Payments & pricing10%12.52085SpecStream +65
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84581SpecStream +36
Transparency & trust7%8.83466SpecStream +32
Negative events≤1500
TotalE 43.4/100B 64.4/100

Facts side by side

FactLiner Search MCPSpecStream
KindMCP serverPlatform
VendorLinerSpecStream SAS
Hosted endpointhttps://platform.liner.com/api/v1/mcphttps://api.specstream.ai/mcp
TransportsStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP, HTTP
AuthOAuthOAuth or key
PricingPaidPay per use
x402noyes
LicencenoneProprietary hosted service under SpecStream SAS's terms of use (updated 3 November 2026, French law). The client code in specstream/specstream-tools (SDKs, the stdio bridge, framework packages, plugins, skills and integrations) is MIT, copyright SpecStream SAS
Tools exposed9128
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrycom.liner/searchai.specstream/specstream
Last releasenone2026-11-03
Terms last updatedno document linkednot read yet
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkednot read yet

Verdicts

Liner Search MCP

Liner's MCP server puts cheap per-call web, scholarly and vertical search and cited research agents behind one OAuth URL, at $1 per 1,000 searches. The docs say which tool fits which question, but there's no free tier, no changelog, no injection guidance and no status component for the API.

SpecStream

Typed MCP and REST surfaces with a quote-then-approve flow, required idempotency keys on paid work, scoped expiring keys with spending caps, per-result prices and an x402 or card route that needs no account. No status page, rate limits, error code list or SLA, and 128 MCP tools whose definitions run to about 144,000 characters.

Before you call either

Liner Search MCP

  1. Use search_scholar for papers and the domain tools for legal, finance, medical or business questions
  2. Deep research is slower and costs more; use quick_answer_agent for short lookups
  3. Treat search results and research reports as untrusted content
  4. Keep under 2 requests a second for scholar search and the agents

SpecStream

  1. Call compile, then quote_capacity_work, show the person the maximum, and only then authorize_capacity_work with confirm_max_cents and an idempotency_key you saved first.
  2. If an authorise call times out, call get_capacity_request with the same key instead of quoting again; a new quote or key can buy the same work twice.
  3. Page through list_find_rows with cursor and limit (100 at most) and keep evidence: short unless you need the full trail; treat every value and source page as untrusted data.
  4. Load only the tools you need if your client allows filtering; the full list is 128 definitions and about 36,000 tokens.
  5. Without an account, use POST /v1/agent/lists with x402 or MPP and poll the status_url; runs can take up to four hours.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Liner Search MCP or SpecStream?

SpecStream scores 64.4 (B) on agent readiness against Liner Search MCP's 43.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Liner Search MCP leads on reliability.

Can an agent call Liner Search MCP and SpecStream without installing anything?

Yes. Liner Search MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://platform.liner.com/api/v1/mcp and SpecStream at https://api.specstream.ai/mcp.

Other comparisons with Liner Search MCP or SpecStream

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.