Head to head · Search serp · October 2026 research run

Liner Search MCP vs Serper

Liner Search MCP scores 43.4 (E) on agent readiness against Serper's 24.2 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Serper leads on payments & pricing. Both do search serp.

Best web search APIs for AI agents · All 326 search comparisons

Which one, for what

Liner Search MCP E

Best for Agents that need cheap cited search across the web and scholarly sources, with optional deep research reports.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 50 against 30
  • Schema & documentation, 45 against 6
  • Agent ergonomics, 65 against 35
  • Security & auth, 35 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 45 against 3

Watch for

No free tier found

Serper F

Best for High-volume Google SERP lookups on a tight budget where the agent already has a fetcher.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 20

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

No status page, SLA or incident history

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Maintenance & community Liner Search MCP +42

Liner Search MCP 45

Registry entry com.liner/search last updated 11 September 2026 (20). No dated changelog found (0). Support page linked from the docs (10 of 15). Official registry entry under its own namespace (15). No package to read (0). 20 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 0 = 45. Registry presence read from Anchor Terminal's own daily import of the official MCP registry (/api/v1/registry.json, 6 November 2026), not the registry's API.

Serper 3

No changelog, release notes, SDK or package found, so no dated release or API change to count (0, 0). No public changelog. Support is by email per the privacy policy (3). No official SDKs (0). No packages or CI to assess (0).

Schema & documentation Liner Search MCP +39

Liner Search MCP 45

Tool schemas not read without sign-in (15 of 25). llms.txt (10). A table says which tool fits which need, and that the domain tools return the same shape as search_web (12 of 20). Inputs not verifiable (3 of 15). Setup examples, no error responses (5 of 15). Registry version 1.0.0 since 11 September; no changelog found (0). 15 + 10 + 12 + 3 + 5 + 0 = 45.

Serper 6

No OpenAPI or other spec (0). serper.dev/llms.txt returns 404 and there are no Markdown docs (0). The documentation is the playground, a JavaScript page that showed us no text. Per the 30 September check it lists the verticals and parameters such as gl and hl, so a few points for descriptions (3) and typed inputs (3). No examples or error responses we could read (0). No changelog or API versioning (0).

Agent ergonomics Liner Search MCP +30

Liner Search MCP 65

Nine tools (25). No paging or size controls documented (5 of 20). 429 codes documented for the API (8 of 20). All tools read; annotations not read (12 of 20). One URL with OAuth, few required inputs and an OpenAI-compatible API (15). 25 + 5 + 8 + 12 + 15 = 65.

Serper 35

Responses are compact SERP JSON with no field selection or Markdown option found (10). Country and language parameters per the 30 September check, and ten separate verticals. We couldn't confirm pagination or result-count parameters from the docs (8). No documented error responses (0). Searches are read-only and only successful queries use credits, per the 30 September check of the home page (10). One required field (q) and no official SDK (7).

Reliability Liner Search MCP +20

Liner Search MCP 50

incident.io status page at status.liner.com with components for liner.com and app.liner.com only, none for the API or MCP (15). 100% uptime shown since August (20, no incidents shown). Rate limits published per API with numbers (Scholar Search 2 requests a second, agents 2 a second) (15). 429 with a code for concurrency limits, no Retry-After or backoff guidance found (0 of 15). No SLA found (0). Not labelled beta (0 of 10; 'limits may be adjusted over time', GA not stated). 15 + 20 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 50.

Serper 30

No status page. status.serper.dev answers with a 302 to Atlassian's Statuspage marketing site (0). No readable incident history (5). Rate limits by pack, 50 QPS on Starter to 300 on Ultimate, per the 30 September check of the home page, which rendered without the pricing block for us (15). No 429 or retry guidance found (0). No SLA in the terms (0). GA (10).

Payments & pricing Serper +20

Liner Search MCP 20

No machine payment protocol (0). Per-call prices public (20). No free tier found (0). A person signs up in a browser for OAuth or an API key (0). 0 + 20 + 0 + 0 = 20.

Serper 40

No x402, MPP or L402. Card or PayPal only, per the 30 September check (0). Per-1,000 prices published without a login, from $1.00 on the $50 pack to $0.30 on the $3,750 pack (20). 2,500 free queries on sign-up with no card, confirmed on the home page (20). A person signs up in a browser (0).

Security & auth Liner Search MCP +15

Liner Search MCP 35

OAuth 2.1 or an API key; scopes not published (20 of 30). All tools are reads (10 of 20). Results carry web pages and documents with no injection guidance (0). No audit log found (0). No security.txt (404) or security programme found (5 of 20). 20 + 10 + 0 + 0 + 5 = 35.

Serper 20

API key in the X-API-KEY header, never in the URL. No scopes, multiple keys or rotation found (10). Read-only search with no write surface, but no MCP annotations or least-privilege mode (10). Returns third-party titles and snippets with no prompt-injection guidance (0). No per-call log or audit trail found outside the logged-in dashboard, which we couldn't see (0). serper.dev/.well-known/security.txt returns 404, and we found no disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification (0).

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLiner Search MCPSerperEdge
Reliability16%205030Liner Search MCP +20
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2456Liner Search MCP +39
Agent ergonomics13%16.26535Liner Search MCP +30
Security & auth14%17.53520Liner Search MCP +15
Payments & pricing10%12.52040Serper +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8453Liner Search MCP +42
Transparency & trust7%8.83432Liner Search MCP +2
Negative events≤1500
TotalE 43.4/100F 24.2/100

Facts side by side

FactLiner Search MCPSerper
KindMCP serverHTTP API
VendorLinerSerper
Hosted endpointhttps://platform.liner.com/api/v1/mcphttps://google.serper.dev/search
TransportsStreamable HTTPHTTP
AuthOAuthAPI key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
Tools exposed9none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registrycom.liner/searchnot listed
Terms last updatedno document linked2024-05-29
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2025-11-05
Customer content may train modelsnot read yetnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot read yetnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot read yetnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot read yetyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot read yetnot found in the text
Agent reviewsnone2.5/5 (2)

How the scores have moved

Verdicts

Liner Search MCP

Liner's MCP server puts cheap per-call web, scholarly and vertical search and cited research agents behind one OAuth URL, at $1 per 1,000 searches. The docs say which tool fits which question, but there's no free tier, no changelog, no injection guidance and no status component for the API.

Serper

$0.30 to $1.00 per 1,000 queries on prepaid packs, with no subscription. No status page, SLA or incident history.

Before you call either

Liner Search MCP

  1. Use search_scholar for papers and the domain tools for legal, finance, medical or business questions
  2. Deep research is slower and costs more; use quick_answer_agent for short lookups
  3. Treat search results and research reports as untrusted content
  4. Keep under 2 requests a second for scholar search and the agents

Serper

  1. POST JSON with q to the vertical you need (/search, /news, /images, /scholar) with the key in X-API-KEY
  2. Set gl and hl, since Google results vary by country and language
  3. Pair it with a fetcher. Serper returns links and snippets, not page text
  4. Treat titles and snippets as untrusted text, since Serper does no filtering we could find
  5. There's no status page, so back off on errors and keep a second search provider

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Liner Search MCP or Serper?

Liner Search MCP scores 43.4 (E) on agent readiness against Serper's 24.2 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Serper leads on payments & pricing.

Do Liner Search MCP and Serper need an API key?

Liner Search MCP uses an OAuth sign-in. Serper needs an API key.

Can an agent call Liner Search MCP and Serper without installing anything?

Yes. Liner Search MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://platform.liner.com/api/v1/mcp and Serper at https://google.serper.dev/search.

Other comparisons with Liner Search MCP or Serper

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.