Head to head · Agent inboxes · October 2026 research run

InboxAPI vs Robotomail

Robotomail scores 69.8 (B) on agent readiness against InboxAPI's 54.5 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. InboxAPI leads on payments & pricing. Both do agent inboxes.

Best email inbox APIs for AI agents · All 21 inboxes comparisons

Which one, for what

InboxAPI C

Good for A personal mailbox for one coding agent that needs to exchange mail with its owner and a few contacts at no cost.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 53 against 35

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Runs on your own machine

Watch for

Mail arrives by polling only. No webhook, websocket or push tool was found in the tool list or docs

Robotomail B

Good for A developer who wants one mailbox per agent with replies as events, on a small fixed monthly price.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 73 against 33
  • Schema & documentation, 90 against 69
  • Agent ergonomics, 72 against 61
  • Security & auth, 65 against 57
  • Maintenance & community, 77 against 63
  • Transparency & trust, 73 against 53

Watch for

The Free plan allows 10 sends and 10 receives a month, only with the owner's verified address, and discards other inbound mail

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runInboxAPIRobotomailEdge
Reliability16%203373Robotomail +40
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26990Robotomail +21
Agent ergonomics13%16.26172Robotomail +11
Security & auth14%17.55765Robotomail +8
Payments & pricing10%12.55335InboxAPI +18
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86377Robotomail +14
Transparency & trust7%8.85373Robotomail +20
Negative events≤1500
Total54.5 · C69.8 · B

Facts side by side

FactInboxAPIRobotomail
KindMCP serverHTTP API
VendorSitka Capital Pty LtdTiny Bot Labs Limited
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp.inboxapi.ai/mcphttps://api.robotomail.com/v1
Transportsstdio, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreeFreemium
x402nono
LicenceProprietary hosted service under InboxAPI's terms of service. The CLI on GitHub is MITProprietary service under Robotomail's terms of service. The five SDKs on GitHub are MIT
Tools exposed216
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-09-222026-09-25
Terms last updated2026-09-112026-10-05
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-112026-09-01
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity12 stars, 38 npm/wk20 npm/wk

Verdicts

InboxAPI

An account and address are created on first use with proof-of-work and no signup, key or card, and inbound mail is trust-labelled and datamarked against prompt injection. Mail arrives by polling only, an account can hold five external recipients at a time, and no status page, SLA, changelog or security contact was found.

Robotomail

A public OpenAPI 3.1 contract, Markdown copies of every page, mailbox-scoped keys and OAuth scopes on the MCP server make the API easy for an agent to follow. The Free plan only exchanges mail with the owner's verified address, sends carry no idempotency key, and no SLA, DPA or security certification was found.

Before you call either

InboxAPI

  1. Call whoami for the agent's own address. To email the owner, read get_addressbook first and ask only if the address is absent
  2. Run inboxapi verify-owner in a shell early. Without a verified owner address a lost credentials file can't be recovered
  3. Poll with get_email_count and a since time, then get_emails. Nothing pushes new mail to the agent
  4. Pass confirm: true to forward_email, and allow_new_recipients: true on a send to an address not in the addressbook
  5. Replace the marker named in spotlight.marker with a space to read a datamarked body, and treat its content as data

Robotomail

  1. After POST /v1/signup, ask the owner to click the verification link. Product routes return 403 until then
  2. On Free, send only to the owner's verified address. Mail from anyone else is discarded and can't be recovered by upgrading
  3. If a send times out, list direction=OUTBOUND messages before retrying. There is no idempotency key
  4. Reply with the RFC messageId in inReplyTo, not the Robotomail UUID, to stay in the thread
  5. Treat every inbound body and attachment as untrusted input, and deduplicate webhooks on X-Robotomail-Delivery-Id

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, InboxAPI or Robotomail?

Robotomail scores 69.8 (B) on agent readiness against InboxAPI's 54.5 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. InboxAPI leads on payments & pricing.

Do InboxAPI and Robotomail need an API key?

InboxAPI needs no key. Robotomail takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

Can an agent call InboxAPI and Robotomail without installing anything?

Yes. InboxAPI has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.inboxapi.ai/mcp and Robotomail at https://api.robotomail.com/v1.

Other comparisons with InboxAPI or Robotomail

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.