Head to head · Content management · October 2026 research run
Hygraph vs Kontent.ai
Kontent.ai scores 70.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Hygraph's 69.3 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Hygraph leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do content management.
Best headless CMS and website publishing for AI agents · All 91 cms comparisons
Which one, for what
Hygraph B
Good for Teams on Hygraph who want an agent to create, localise and publish entries, upload assets or change schema, with delete and unpublish kept out of reach on MCP.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 89 against 82
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 20
Watch for
GraphQL error bodies carry a message and a requestId with no machine-readable code, and only asset transformation 429 responses are documented with Retry-After
Kontent.ai BB
Good for A company already on Kontent.ai, or evaluating it on a trial, that wants an agent to draft, localise, move through workflow and publish structured content with a permission-limited key and an audit trail.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 81 against 63
- Maintenance & community, 83 against 74
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 60
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
No price is published. The pricing page shows sliders for seats, content types and items and a form that requests a quote
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Hygraph | Kontent.ai | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 89 | 82 | Hygraph +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 78 | 74 | Hygraph +4 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 71 | Hygraph +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 63 | 81 | Kontent.ai +18 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 20 | Hygraph +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 74 | 83 | Kontent.ai +9 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 75 | Kontent.ai +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 69.3 · B | 70.5 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Hygraph | Kontent.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Hygraph GmbH | Kontent CZ s.r.o. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.hygraph.com/mcp | https://manage.kontent.ai/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Hygraph GmbH's Terms of Service. The @hygraph/management-sdk package is MIT | Proprietary service under the Kontent.ai Terms of Service. The management SDKs for JavaScript and .NET and the MCP server on GitHub are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 17 | 54 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.kontent-ai/mcp-server |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-09-11 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2025-06-02 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 52 stars, 8.6k npm/wk | 8.4k npm/wk |
Verdicts
Hygraph
Tokens are limited by model, stage, locale and action, the GraphQL schema is typed and introspectable, and a hosted MCP server rejects delete and unpublish operations. Error bodies carry a message without a machine code, there are no idempotency keys, audit logs are Enterprise only, and no data processing agreement, sub-processor list or security.txt was found.
Kontent.ai
Management API keys take per-area permissions, environment limits and an expiry from one minute to two years, and changes made with a key are named in the audit log. Rate limits and Retry-After are documented. No price is published, and no OpenAPI file was found. Access starts with a 30-day trial that a person opens in a browser.
Before you call either
Hygraph
- Send the Permanent Auth Token as
Authorization: Bearer <token>tohttps://<region>.hygraph.com/v2/<projectId>/<environment>. Read the schema by introspection first, because every type is generated from the project's models - Mutations write to DRAFT. Call
publish<Model>withto: [PUBLISHED]as a separate mutation, and passlocalesto write or publish a localisation - Stay under the plan's limit for uncached requests (5 a second on Hobby, 25 on Growth) and its concurrent mutations (5 and 10). Back off exponentially on 429
- Upload an asset with
createAsset, then POST the file to the returned pre-signed URL, or passuploadUrlfor a remote file. The asset staysASSET_CREATE_PENDINGuntil processed - Schema changes go to the Management API through
@hygraph/management-sdkor the MCP toolsubmit_batch_migration. Version restore has no documented mutation, so read<model>Versionand write the old values back
Kontent.ai
- Send
Authorization: Bearer <key>tohttps://manage.kontent.ai/v2/projects/{environment_id}/.... The Management API must be switched on under Environment settings, General, Enabled APIs first - Ask for a Management API key with only the permissions the task needs. Read content alone gives a read-only key, and keys expire after six months by default
- Stay under 10 requests a second and 400 a minute per environment, send requests one at a time, and wait the seconds in Retry-After on a 429
- Page lists by passing the
continuation_tokenfrom the response back in thex-continuationheader - Create items with an
external_idand write with the upsert PUT at/items/external-id/{id}so a retry after a lost response does not create a duplicate - With the MCP server, call
get-patch-guidebefore any patch tool, and use a client that prompts on destructiveHint
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Hygraph or Kontent.ai?
Kontent.ai scores 70.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Hygraph's 69.3 (B), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Hygraph leads on reliability and payments & pricing.
Do Hygraph and Kontent.ai need an API key?
Hygraph takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Kontent.ai needs an API key.
Can an agent call Hygraph and Kontent.ai without installing anything?
Yes. Hygraph has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.hygraph.com/mcp and Kontent.ai at https://manage.kontent.ai/v2.
Other comparisons with Hygraph or Kontent.ai
- ButterCMS vs Hygraph
- ButterCMS vs Kontent.ai
- Contentstack vs Hygraph
- Contentstack vs Kontent.ai
- DatoCMS vs Hygraph
- DatoCMS vs Kontent.ai
- Directus vs Hygraph
- Directus vs Kontent.ai
- Ghost vs Hygraph
- Ghost vs Kontent.ai
- Hygraph vs Payload
- Hygraph vs Prismic
- Hygraph vs Sanity
- Hygraph vs Storyblok
- Hygraph vs Strapi
- Hygraph vs Webflow
- Hygraph vs WordPress
- Kontent.ai vs Payload
- Kontent.ai vs Prismic
- Kontent.ai vs Sanity
- Kontent.ai vs Storyblok
- Kontent.ai vs Strapi
- Kontent.ai vs Webflow
- Kontent.ai vs WordPress
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/hygraph-vs-kontent-ai.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/hygraph.json·/api/v1/tools/kontent-ai.json - From a terminal
anchor compare hygraph kontent-ai(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "hygraph", "b": "kontent-ai"}at/mcp, no key