Head to head · Content management · October 2026 research run
Directus vs Kontent.ai
Kontent.ai scores 70.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Directus's 67.1 (B), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Directus leads on schema & documentation and payments & pricing. Both do content management.
Best headless CMS and website publishing for AI agents · All 91 cms comparisons
Which one, for what
Directus B
Good for Teams that already keep content in an SQL database and want an agent to edit items, files and the data model under a named user's permissions.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 74
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 20
Watch for
Version 12 (10 June 2026) added licence enforcement. The free Core tier allows 3 Studio seats, 25 collections and 5 flows, and an instance over its limits is locked after a grace period
Kontent.ai BB
Good for A company already on Kontent.ai, or evaluating it on a trial, that wants an agent to draft, localise, move through workflow and publish structured content with a permission-limited key and an audit trail.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 81 against 68
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 61
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where Directus loses 6 points for them
Watch for
No price is published. The pricing page shows sliders for seats, content types and items and a form that requests a quote
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Directus | Kontent.ai | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 82 | 82 | even |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 81 | 74 | Directus +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 73 | 71 | Directus +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 68 | 81 | Kontent.ai +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 55 | 20 | Directus +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 86 | 83 | Directus +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 75 | Kontent.ai +14 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -6 | 0 | |
| Total | 67.1 · B | 70.5 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Directus | Kontent.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Monospace Inc. (Directus) | Kontent CZ s.r.o. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://manage.kontent.ai/v2 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MSCL-1.0-GPL (Monospace Sustainable Core Licence 1.0), source-available with a licence key for paid tiers, each version converting to GPL-3.0 after four years. @directus/sdk is MIT | Proprietary service under the Kontent.ai Terms of Service. The management SDKs for JavaScript and .NET and the MCP server on GitHub are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 12 | 54 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.kontent-ai/mcp-server |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-09-11 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-06-09 | 2025-06-02 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 38k stars, 23k npm/wk | 8.4k npm/wk |
Verdicts
Directus
The built-in MCP server works under the connecting user's permissions, supports OAuth limited to the MCP endpoint and blocks deletes unless an administrator allows them. Since version 12 a licence check caps the free Core tier at 3 Studio seats, 25 collections and 5 flows, and the default tool list carries about 79 KB of instructions.
Kontent.ai
Management API keys take per-area permissions, environment limits and an expiry from one minute to two years, and changes made with a key are named in the audit log. Rate limits and Retry-After are documented. No price is published, and no OpenAPI file was found. Access starts with a 30-day trial that a person opens in a browser.
Before you call either
Directus
- Connect with OAuth or an
Authorization: Bearerheader. Don't put the token in the URL as?access_token=, where it can be logged - Use
/mcp?tool_mode=registrywhen the client loads every tool definition. Default mode sends each tool's full instructions, about 79 KB in total - Read the
schematool before writing. Item payloads are untyped objects, so field names and types come only from the data model - Publish a version with
POST /versions/{id}/promoteover REST. The MCPitemstool refuses system collections such asdirectus_versions - Count translation and junction tables against the 25-collection Core limit before creating collections
Kontent.ai
- Send
Authorization: Bearer <key>tohttps://manage.kontent.ai/v2/projects/{environment_id}/.... The Management API must be switched on under Environment settings, General, Enabled APIs first - Ask for a Management API key with only the permissions the task needs. Read content alone gives a read-only key, and keys expire after six months by default
- Stay under 10 requests a second and 400 a minute per environment, send requests one at a time, and wait the seconds in Retry-After on a 429
- Page lists by passing the
continuation_tokenfrom the response back in thex-continuationheader - Create items with an
external_idand write with the upsert PUT at/items/external-id/{id}so a retry after a lost response does not create a duplicate - With the MCP server, call
get-patch-guidebefore any patch tool, and use a client that prompts on destructiveHint
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Directus or Kontent.ai?
Kontent.ai scores 70.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Directus's 67.1 (B), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Directus leads on schema & documentation and payments & pricing.
Do Directus and Kontent.ai need an API key?
Directus takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Kontent.ai needs an API key.
Can an agent call Directus and Kontent.ai without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Directus. Kontent.ai has a hosted endpoint at https://manage.kontent.ai/v2.
Other comparisons with Directus or Kontent.ai
- ButterCMS vs Directus
- ButterCMS vs Kontent.ai
- Contentstack vs Directus
- Contentstack vs Kontent.ai
- DatoCMS vs Directus
- DatoCMS vs Kontent.ai
- Directus vs Ghost
- Directus vs Hygraph
- Directus vs Payload
- Directus vs Prismic
- Directus vs Sanity
- Directus vs Storyblok
- Directus vs Strapi
- Directus vs Webflow
- Directus vs WordPress
- Ghost vs Kontent.ai
- Hygraph vs Kontent.ai
- Kontent.ai vs Payload
- Kontent.ai vs Prismic
- Kontent.ai vs Sanity
- Kontent.ai vs Storyblok
- Kontent.ai vs Strapi
- Kontent.ai vs Webflow
- Kontent.ai vs WordPress
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/directus-vs-kontent-ai.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/directus.json·/api/v1/tools/kontent-ai.json - From a terminal
anchor compare directus kontent-ai(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "directus", "b": "kontent-ai"}at/mcp, no key