Head to head · FHIR servers · October 2026 research run

Health Gorilla vs ROOK

Health Gorilla scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against ROOK's 54.9 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ROOK leads on reliability, payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do fhir servers.

Best health record and wellness data APIs for AI agents · All 63 health comparisons

Which one, for what

Health Gorilla C

Best for US providers, labs and digital health companies that need network record retrieval and lab ordering through one FHIR API with a QHIN behind it.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 80 against 74
  • Agent ergonomics, 72 against 49
  • Security & auth, 66 against 32
  • Transparency & trust, 61 against 55

Watch for

No public prices. Fees are set case by case and the sandbox is requested by form

ROOK C

Best for A wellness, insurance, corporate wellness or remote monitoring product that wants normalised wearable data pushed to its backend, with plan prices it can see up front.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 75 against 58
  • Payments & pricing, 25 against 5
  • Maintenance & community, 73 against 63

Watch for

Credentials are one client UUID and secret per environment, sent by Basic auth, with no scopes or rotation documented

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runHealth GorillaROOKEdge
Reliability16%205875ROOK +17
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28074Health Gorilla +6
Agent ergonomics13%16.27249Health Gorilla +23
Security & auth14%17.56632Health Gorilla +34
Payments & pricing10%12.5525ROOK +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86373ROOK +10
Transparency & trust7%8.86155Health Gorilla +6
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 59.3/100C 54.9/100

Facts side by side

FactHealth GorillaROOK
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorHealth Gorilla, Inc.Rookeries Development Corp.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthOAuthAPI key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Health Gorilla's API Terms of Use (updated 22 January 2026), with a signed licence agreement required before productionProprietary service under ROOK's Terms and Conditions for ROOK services
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-142026-10-07
Terms last updatedno date given2026-08-01
Privacy policy last updated2024-08-302026-05-28
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyesnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textyes

Verdicts

Health Gorilla

A TEFCA QHIN with a FHIR R4 API, OpenAPI fragments on every reference page, idempotency keys on POST and dated weekly release notes. Access is sales-led, with case-by-case fees, a sandbox by request and no published rate limit numbers, and the API terms allow access to be cut at any time.

ROOK

Graded on the REST API. A public OpenAPI file, a free Sandbox from the self-serve portal, published plan prices and a dated changelog. Credentials are one client UUID and secret per environment with no scopes, 429 handling isn't documented, the API is meant for occasional queries rather than bulk reads, and no SOC 2 report or security contact was found.

Before you call either

Health Gorilla

  1. Send a fresh UUID in HG-Idempotency-Key on every POST and reuse it only when retrying the same payload
  2. Poll async operations no sooner than the Retry-After value and treat 454 as an expired result
  3. Follow link.relation=next in Bundles rather than building offsets yourself
  4. Expect mocked Patient360 data in sandbox unless network connectivity is enabled for the tenant
  5. Log X-HG-Request-Id from each response for support cases

ROOK

  1. Send HTTP Basic auth with client_uuid as the username and the secret key as the password, plus a User-Agent header, or the WAF returns 403
  2. Use https://api.rook-connect.review for Sandbox and https://api.rook-connect.com for production. Each has its own credentials
  3. Read health data from the data webhook. Use the API only for occasional queries, and stay under 60 requests a minute
  4. Deduplicate summaries on document_version and datetime. ROOK resends a summary with a higher document_version when it changes
  5. Call POST /api/v1/user_id/{user_id}/data_sources/revoke_auth to end a connection. Some providers take hours to stop sending data

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Health Gorilla or ROOK?

Health Gorilla scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against ROOK's 54.9 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. ROOK leads on reliability, payments & pricing and maintenance & community.

Do Health Gorilla and ROOK need an API key?

Health Gorilla uses an OAuth sign-in. ROOK needs an API key.

Can an agent call Health Gorilla and ROOK without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for Health Gorilla. No hosted endpoint is listed for ROOK.

Other comparisons with Health Gorilla or ROOK

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.