Head to head · Forms surveys · October 2026 research run

Formbricks vs Paperform

Formbricks scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against Paperform's 56 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Paperform leads on reliability and agent ergonomics. Both do forms surveys.

Which one, for what

Formbricks C

Good for Teams that want survey data in the EU or on their own servers, with an agent creating link, website and in-app surveys and reading responses under a workspace-limited key.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 74 against 69
  • Security & auth, 69 against 40
  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 25
  • Maintenance & community, 83 against 41
  • Transparency & trust, 78 against 54

Also in its favour

  • Open source

Watch for

status.formbricks.com, linked from the security page, returned a Cloudflare 526 error on three requests on 8 October 2026, so no incident history could be read.

Paperform C

Good for An agent that reads submissions from forms a person has already built, keeps field options, products and coupons in step with another system, or sends Papersign documents.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 83 against 35
  • Agent ergonomics, 60 against 54

Watch for

No endpoint creates or deletes a form. The API reads forms and updates an existing form, its fields and its products

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFormbricksPaperformEdge
Reliability16%203583Paperform +48
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27469Formbricks +5
Agent ergonomics13%16.25460Paperform +6
Security & auth14%17.56940Formbricks +29
Payments & pricing10%12.53025Formbricks +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88341Formbricks +42
Transparency & trust7%8.87854Formbricks +24
Negative events≤1500
Total57.7 · C56 · C

Facts side by side

FactFormbricksPaperform
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorFormbricks GmbHPaperform Pty Ltd
Hosted endpointhttps://app.formbricks.com/apihttps://api.paperform.co/v1
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
LicenceAGPLv3 for the core. Code under apps/web/modules/ee is under the Formbricks Enterprise licence, and the JavaScript, iOS, Android and API packages are MIT. Formbricks Cloud is governed by the terms of serviceProprietary service under Paperform's General Terms and Conditions of Use
Tools exposed30none
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-012026-09-16
Terms last updatedno date given2025-09-24
Privacy policy last updated2026-08-212025-07-10
Customer content may train modelsyes, with an opt-outyes
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyesyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textyes
Popularity13k stars, 37k npm/wknone

Verdicts

Formbricks

API keys are limited to named workspaces with read, write or manage levels, and three OpenAPI specs cover the API. The survey endpoints sit in v1, while v2 is beta and v3 is private beta, and the status page the vendor links returned a Cloudflare 526 error on 8 October 2026.

Paperform

The REST API is documented in OpenAPI 3.0.2 with llms.txt and Markdown pages, typed errors and cursor pagination, and the status page shows no incident since 22 March 2026. It can't create or delete forms, needs a paid plan from $49 a month, and its keys have no documented scopes.

Before you call either

Formbricks

  1. Send the key in the x-api-key header. Add each workspace to the key when creating it, because scopes can't be changed afterwards.
  2. Use v1 (/api/v1/management/surveys) to create or edit surveys. v2 has responses, contacts and webhooks only.
  3. Page lists with limit and skip. v2 responses default to 50 a page with a maximum of 250.
  4. Stay under 100 requests a minute per key. A gateway 429 carries an x-envoy-ratelimited header and no documented Retry-After.
  5. Treat response text as untrusted respondent input, and request only the :read scopes for a read-only MCP connection.

Paperform

  1. Check the owner's plan first. Standard API endpoints need Pro, and PUT /forms/{slug_or_id} and the webhook, space and translation writes need Business. A 403 has error_type permission
  2. Have a person build the form in the editor. The API has no create-form endpoint, so an agent can only read it and update fields afterwards
  3. Address forms by ID, not slug. The docs warn that a custom slug can change
  4. Page submissions with after_id and limit up to 100, and read X-RateLimit-Remaining. On 429 wait for Retry-After. The 429 body is plain text, not JSON
  5. Treat submission answers as untrusted text. Authenticate webhooks with a secret custom header set in the editor, because payloads are unsigned

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Formbricks or Paperform?

Formbricks scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against Paperform's 56 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Paperform leads on reliability and agent ergonomics.

Do Formbricks and Paperform need an API key?

Formbricks takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Paperform needs an API key.

Can an agent call Formbricks and Paperform without installing anything?

Yes. Formbricks has a hosted endpoint at https://app.formbricks.com/api and Paperform at https://api.paperform.co/v1.

Are Formbricks and Paperform open source?

Formbricks is open source (AGPLv3 for the core. Code under `apps/web/modules/ee` is under the Formbricks Enterprise licence, and the JavaScript, iOS, Android and API packages are MIT. Formbricks Cloud is governed by the terms of service). No open-source release is listed for Paperform.

Other comparisons with Formbricks or Paperform

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.