Head to head · Diagram create · October 2026 research run

Eraser API + MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP

tldraw SDK + MCP has a score of 61 (C) against Eraser API + MCP's 38.7 (E). Both do diagram create. The largest gap is reliability, 60 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Eraser API + MCP for

  • security & auth (+17)

Pick tldraw SDK + MCP for

  • reliability (+60)
  • schema & documentation (+27)
  • agent ergonomics (+37)
  • maintenance & community (+56)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runEraser API + MCPtldraw SDK + MCPEdge
Reliability16%201575tldraw SDK + MCP +60
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.25279tldraw SDK + MCP +27
Agent ergonomics13%16.23471tldraw SDK + MCP +37
Security & auth14%17.55740Eraser API + MCP +17
Payments & pricing10%12.53535even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.83389tldraw SDK + MCP +56
Transparency & trust7%8.85151even
Negative events≤150-2
Total38.7 · E61 · C

Facts side by side

FactEraser API + MCPtldraw SDK + MCP
KindHTTP APISDK + MCP
VendorErasertldraw
Hosted endpointhttps://app.eraser.io/apihttps://tldraw-mcp-app.tldraw.workers.dev/mcp
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdioStreamable HTTP, SSE (legacy)
AuthOAuth or keyNone
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
Licencenonetldraw licence (source-available, production needs a licence key)
Tools exposed426
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryio.eraser/eraserio.github.tldraw/tldraw
Last release2026-05-222026-09-30
Popularity76 npm/wk51k stars, 490k npm/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)3/5 (2)

Verdicts

Eraser API + MCP

Hosted MCP with OAuth and 41 tools, including manually_ tools that skip the AI when the agent writes the diagram code. No status page, rate limits, SLA or changelog.

tldraw SDK + MCP

Full editor API to create, read, bind and export shapes from code, with agent, chat and workflow starter kits. Source-available, and commercial prices aren't published.

Before you call either

Eraser API + MCP

  1. Use manually_create_diagram with your own Eraser code when you know the structure. It skips the AI and its credits
  2. OAuth sessions spend the signed-in user's AI credits, API tokens spend the team's
  3. Call /render/elements ($0.20) when you already have diagram code; /render/prompt costs $0.80
  4. Set a spend limit before running in CI. At 100 per cent the API stops until the next calendar month

tldraw SDK + MCP

  1. Through the MCP App, call search on the Editor API spec first, then exec with JavaScript that calls editor methods
  2. Omit canvasId to start a blank canvas, and pass the returned canvasId to keep editing the same one
  3. Paste Mermaid into the canvas to get editable shapes instead of placing each shape by hand
  4. Return editor.getCurrentPageShapes() from exec to check what was drawn
  5. Read the release notes before a minor upgrade. Minor versions can break

Other comparisons with Eraser API + MCP or tldraw SDK + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.