# Eraser API + MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP (slim)

> tldraw SDK + MCP has a score of 61 (C) against Eraser API + MCP's 38.7 (E). Both do diagram create. The largest gap is reliability, 60 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eraser-vs-tldraw.md (~1,500 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eraser-vs-tldraw.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eraser-vs-tldraw
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

tldraw SDK + MCP has a score of 61 (C) against Eraser API + MCP's 38.7 (E). Both do diagram create. The largest gap is reliability, 60 points.

- Eraser API + MCP: E 38.7, rank #427 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/eraser.min.md
- tldraw SDK + MCP: C 61, rank #236 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tldraw.min.md
- Pick Eraser API + MCP for security & auth (+17). Pick tldraw SDK + MCP for reliability (+60), schema & documentation (+27), agent ergonomics (+37), maintenance & community (+56).

| Category | Eraser API + MCP | tldraw SDK + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 15 | 75 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 52 | 79 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 34 | 71 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 57 | 40 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 33 | 89 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 51 | 51 |