Cozi Family Organizer vs Reclaim.ai

Cozi Family Organizer 10

Published account, privacy and user-control documentation earns 10 points. No external-agent credential scopes, per-call audit contract or complete least-privilege API were verified. Vendor security statements were not independently audited.

Reclaim.ai 53

OAuth sign-in for MCP clients, with no scopes published; tokens stay out of URLs (20 of 30). Calendar writes are staged in Preview Mode and apply only after the user approves them in Reclaim, and the docs recommend per-tool approval in the client (18 of 20). Event titles, descriptions and invitee text reach the model, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (0). Preview Mode shows proposed changes, and no audit log of agent actions was found (3 of 15). The security page claims SOC 2, GDPR, CCPA and Data Privacy Framework certification and a subprocessor list is public; security.txt redirected in a loop and no disclosure policy was found (12 of 20). 20 + 18 + 0 + 3 + 12 = 53.

Cozi Family Organizer 15

No readable 90-day incident record established (5). The consumer or commercially available product is documented (10). No public external-agent rate limits, safe-retry contract or SLA were verified (0).

Reclaim.ai 45

Graded as a hosted service on the MCP server at mcp.reclaim.ai. Statuspage at status.reclaim.ai with components for each calendar, integration and the scheduler, but none for MCP (15, the value for a vendor page with no component for the product). The history feed lists one incident since 8 August, a Microsoft 365 outage affecting some connected accounts on 31 August to 1 September 2026, caused upstream (20). No rate limits found (0). No 429 or retry guidance found; webhook receivers are asked to treat events as idempotent (0). No SLA found (0). The MCP server is not labelled beta (10). 15 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 45.

Cozi Family Organizer 0

No dated service release series, support-response sample, official developer SDK or dependency health evidence established (0). An active website alone is not a release history.

Reclaim.ai 25

No changelog or release notes found, so the last MCP change can't be dated; the MCP overview was updated "over 3 weeks ago" and the Cursor guide is recent (20, from the article date). No dated release entries (0). Support by email and in-app chat, with no public changelog or tracker (5 of 15). Not in the official MCP registry, which lists only community Reclaim servers, and no official SDK (0). No package to check (0). 20 + 0 + 5 + 0 + 0 = 25.

Cozi Family Organizer 10

Documented user workflows and handoff controls earn 10 points. External-agent output controls, batching and safe write retries were not verified. Do not infer a callable API from the product's own AI functions.

Reclaim.ai 30

Tool count not published (5). Paging and filtering not documented (5 of 20). No documented error responses (3 of 20). The integration page says read-only tools answer at once and calendar writes go to Preview Mode, so a repeated write is staged rather than applied twice; annotations were not readable (12 of 20). One URL with OAuth and no SDK (5 of 15). 5 + 5 + 3 + 12 + 5 = 30.

Cozi Family Organizer 40

Published product, commercial and privacy disclosures earn 35 points. Governing API terms, service-specific retention, deprecation commitments and infrastructure locations were not all established. Where only website terms were found, they are not presented as a partner API agreement.

Reclaim.ai 56

Closed service under terms of 8 April 2024 naming Reclaim.ai Inc. (15 of 30). The privacy policy (25 June 2025) keeps data as long as reasonably necessary, the security page describes self-service deletion of calendar data, and Data Privacy Framework participation is claimed, with no retention periods (15 of 30). Reclaim 1.0 users are moved to 2.0, and no deprecation policy or dates were found (3 of 20). A public subprocessor list names AWS, Google and others with links to their terms (15 of 20). 15 + 15 + 3 + 15 = 48.

Cozi Family Organizer 15

Public product and help material earns 15 points for explaining user workflows. No external-agent machine contract, input schemas or API error catalogue was verified. This score concerns integration documentation, not consumer usability.

Reclaim.ai 28

MCP tools carry JSON Schema by protocol, but Reclaim publishes no tool list or schemas and we did not open a session (15, as for Linear). No llms.txt (404) (0). Tool descriptions not readable (5). Input typing not verifiable (5). Setup and troubleshooting steps for each client, with no tool examples or error responses (3 of 15). No changelog or versioning for the MCP server found (0). 15 + 0 + 5 + 5 + 3 + 0 = 28.