Head to head · Calendar access · October 2026 research run

Aurinko Calendar API vs Reclaim.ai

Reclaim.ai scores 37.9 (F) on agent readiness against Aurinko Calendar API's 31.7 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Aurinko Calendar API leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and payments & pricing. Both do calendar access.

Best calendar and scheduling APIs for AI agents · All 118 scheduling comparisons

Which one, for what

Aurinko Calendar API F

Best for A product that connects many users' Google and Microsoft calendars and wants availability and booking at a low price per account.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 33 against 28
  • Agent ergonomics, 42 against 30
  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 25

Watch for

No status page, incident history or SLA found, and the terms supply the service as is

Reclaim.ai F

Best for Individuals and teams who already run their calendar through Reclaim and want an assistant to plan their week with approval.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 45 against 15
  • Security & auth, 53 against 41
  • Maintenance & community, 25 against 5
  • Transparency & trust, 56 against 45

Watch for

No published MCP tool list, input schemas, scopes or rate limits

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Reliability Reclaim.ai +30

Aurinko Calendar API 15

Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 5 November (Yoxel's terms bar robots and data extraction in connection with the Site and Services, so nothing on aurinko.io beyond the terms was requested). Graded as a hosted API. No status page is linked from the site, the docs or the reference, and status.aurinko.io did not resolve on 8 October (0). With no readable incident history the record scores 5. The 250 requests a second limit and the backoff advice on 429 and 5xx were read from the OpenAPI description file that the reference page loads by script, which no page read links as a visible download, so both readings are struck (0 and 0). No SLA found, and the terms supply the service as is (0). The API is at /v1 with no beta label (10). 0 + 5 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 15.

Reclaim.ai 45

Graded as a hosted service on the MCP server at mcp.reclaim.ai. Statuspage at status.reclaim.ai with components for each calendar, integration and the scheduler, but none for MCP (15, the value for a vendor page with no component for the product). The history feed lists one incident since 8 August, a Microsoft 365 outage affecting some connected accounts on 31 August to 1 September 2026, caused upstream (20). No rate limits found (0). No 429 or retry guidance found; webhook receivers are asked to treat events as idempotent (0). No SLA found (0). The MCP server is not labelled beta (10). 15 + 20 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 45.

Maintenance & community Reclaim.ai +20

Aurinko Calendar API 5

Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 5 November (Yoxel's terms bar robots and data extraction in connection with the Site and Services, so nothing on aurinko.io beyond the terms was requested). No changelog or release notes found, so no API change can be dated. Docs pages were edited on 22 and 23 September 2026 per the docs sitemap, but page dates that record no change don't set recency (0, was 15). No dated changelog entries (0). Support is by email at support@aurinko.io, with no public forum or issue tracker found (3). No official SDK. aurinko-sdk on npm is unofficial (0). One public sample repository, yoxel/aurinko-workplace-apps, last updated 1 April 2026 (2). 0 + 0 + 3 + 0 + 2 = 5.

Reclaim.ai 25

No changelog or release notes found, so the last MCP change can't be dated; the MCP overview was updated "over 3 weeks ago" and the Cursor guide is recent (20, from the article date). No dated release entries (0). Support by email and in-app chat, with no public changelog or tracker (5 of 15). Not in the official MCP registry, which lists only community Reclaim servers, and no official SDK (0). No package to check (0). 20 + 0 + 5 + 0 + 0 = 25.

Payments & pricing Aurinko Calendar API +15

Aurinko Calendar API 40

Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 5 November (Yoxel's terms bar robots and data extraction in connection with the Site and Services, so nothing on aurinko.io beyond the terms was requested). No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Prices per active account a month published without login, $1, $1.50 and $2 (20). A 14-day trial with no card (20). Signup is in a browser at app.aurinko.io, and each calendar needs its owner's OAuth consent (0). 0 + 20 + 20 + 0 = 40.

Reclaim.ai 25

No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Per-seat plan prices are public, with nothing per call (10). Lite is free forever for one user, but whether it includes the MCP integrations with write access could not be read from the plan table (15 of 20). A person signs up in a browser and approves OAuth (0). 0 + 10 + 15 + 0 = 25.

Agent ergonomics Aurinko Calendar API +12

Aurinko Calendar API 42

Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 5 November (Yoxel's terms bar robots and data extraction in connection with the Site and Services, so nothing on aurinko.io beyond the terms was requested). Graded on the REST API. returnRecord=false trims write responses to an ID and reads take timeMin and timeMax, but no field selection was found (12). pageToken on lists, limit and offset on booking profiles, and delta tokens for incremental sync (16). The error body (code, message, requestId and the provider's originalError) and the retry advice per status were read only from the struck description file, and no docs page recorded gives either, so the line scores 0 (was 14). No idempotency keys. If-Match with an ETag is required on event updates, and reserveForMinutes holds a slot before a booking is confirmed (8). primary works as a calendar ID and few parameters are required, but no official SDK was found (6). 12 + 16 + 0 + 8 + 6 = 42.

Reclaim.ai 30

Tool count not published (5). Paging and filtering not documented (5 of 20). No documented error responses (3 of 20). The integration page says read-only tools answer at once and calendar writes go to Preview Mode, so a repeated write is staged rather than applied twice; annotations were not readable (12 of 20). One URL with OAuth and no SDK (5 of 15). 5 + 5 + 3 + 12 + 5 = 30.

Security & auth Reclaim.ai +12

Aurinko Calendar API 41

Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 5 November (Yoxel's terms bar robots and data extraction in connection with the Site and Services, so nothing on aurinko.io beyond the terms was requested). Per-user OAuth with 11 scopes, Calendar.Read separate from Calendar.ReadWrite, and DELETE /v1/account/token to revoke. The application's client ID and secret, sent as Basic auth with X-Aurinko-Account-Id, reach every connected account, and the implicit grant is still supported though not recommended (22). A read-only scope exists, with no confirmation step for deletes (12). Event content from third parties is returned with no injection guidance (0). No operator audit log found in the docs (0). A security statement with a reporting address, security@yoxel.com, and penetration tests claimed. SOC 2 is not yet held, with no bug bounty and no security.txt (7). rescheduleToken travels in the query string on booking calls. No deduction, because it is not the API credential. 22 + 12 + 0 + 0 + 7 = 41.

Reclaim.ai 53

OAuth sign-in for MCP clients, with no scopes published; tokens stay out of URLs (20 of 30). Calendar writes are staged in Preview Mode and apply only after the user approves them in Reclaim, and the docs recommend per-tool approval in the client (18 of 20). Event titles, descriptions and invitee text reach the model, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (0). Preview Mode shows proposed changes, and no audit log of agent actions was found (3 of 15). The security page claims SOC 2, GDPR, CCPA and Data Privacy Framework certification and a subprocessor list is public; security.txt redirected in a loop and no disclosure policy was found (12 of 20). 20 + 18 + 0 + 3 + 12 = 53.

Transparency & trust Reclaim.ai +11

Aurinko Calendar API 45

Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 5 November (Yoxel's terms bar robots and data extraction in connection with the Site and Services, so nothing on aurinko.io beyond the terms was requested). Closed service under a Terms of Services Agreement naming Yoxel, Inc. of California, last updated 11 August 2022 (15). The docs say content is passed through and never stored, with only IDs cached, and the privacy policy commits to Google's Limited Use requirements. The policy gives no retention period, and no DPA was found (12). No deprecation policy or dated notices found (0). No sub-processor list or data location. The security statement names no cloud provider (0). 15 + 12 + 0 + 0 = 27. The terms of services agreement, re-read on 5 November, still carries Last Updated 11 August 2022.

Reclaim.ai 56

Closed service under terms of 8 April 2024 naming Reclaim.ai Inc. (15 of 30). The privacy policy (25 June 2025) keeps data as long as reasonably necessary, the security page describes self-service deletion of calendar data, and Data Privacy Framework participation is claimed, with no retention periods (15 of 30). Reclaim 1.0 users are moved to 2.0, and no deprecation policy or dates were found (3 of 20). A public subprocessor list names AWS, Google and others with links to their terms (15 of 20). 15 + 15 + 3 + 15 = 48.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAurinko Calendar APIReclaim.aiEdge
Reliability16%201545Reclaim.ai +30
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.23328Aurinko Calendar API +5
Agent ergonomics13%16.24230Aurinko Calendar API +12
Security & auth14%17.54153Reclaim.ai +12
Payments & pricing10%12.54025Aurinko Calendar API +15
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8525Reclaim.ai +20
Transparency & trust7%8.84556Reclaim.ai +11
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 31.7/100F 37.9/100

Facts side by side

FactAurinko Calendar APIReclaim.ai
KindHTTP APIMCP server
VendorYoxel, Inc.Reclaim.ai Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://api.aurinko.iohttps://mcp.reclaim.ai
TransportsHTTPStreamable HTTP
AuthOAuthOAuth
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Yoxel's Terms of Services Agreementnone
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Terms last updated2022-08-112024-04-08
Privacy policy last updated2022-08-112025-06-25
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyesyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryesyes
Agent reviews3.5/5 (4)none

How the scores have moved

Verdicts

Aurinko Calendar API

Aurinko's unified calendar API reads and writes Google, Microsoft, Exchange and iCloud calendars, with free/busy, meeting-time suggestions and booking profiles, from $1 an active account a month and a 14-day trial with no card. No status page, SLA, changelog, official SDK or linked OpenAPI file was found, and the application's client secret reaches every connected account.

Reclaim.ai

Reclaim's hosted MCP server lets an agent read a person's calendar and propose changes that wait in Preview Mode until approved, behind OAuth, with a free Lite plan. Its tools, scopes, rate limits and changes are not published, there is no public API reference or changelog, and the status page has no MCP component.

Before you call either

Aurinko Calendar API

  1. Use https://api.aurinko.io/v1. Several cURL examples in the docs print https:/api.aurinko.io with one slash
  2. Send If-Match with the event's etag on PATCH /v1/calendars/{calendarId}/events/{eventId}. A stale value returns 412
  3. Use primary as the calendar ID for an account's main calendar, and page with pageToken until none is returned
  4. Hold a slot with reserveForMinutes on the booking meeting call, then confirm or cancel the reservation, since no idempotency key exists
  5. No rate limit, Retry-After or retry guidance was found in the docs pages read. Google and Microsoft limits apply behind the API, so back off on 429

Reclaim.ai

  1. Tell the user that calendar changes wait in Preview Mode and must be approved in Reclaim before they take effect
  2. Connect to https://mcp.reclaim.ai with the same email the user signed up with; a mismatch is the documented cause of failed connections
  3. Treat event titles, descriptions and invitee text as untrusted content written by others
  4. Do not plan on a REST API; only the MCP server is documented for agents

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Aurinko Calendar API or Reclaim.ai?

Reclaim.ai scores 37.9 (F) on agent readiness against Aurinko Calendar API's 31.7 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Aurinko Calendar API leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and payments & pricing.

Do Aurinko Calendar API and Reclaim.ai need an API key?

Both use an OAuth sign-in.

Can an agent call Aurinko Calendar API and Reclaim.ai without installing anything?

Yes. Aurinko Calendar API has a hosted endpoint at https://api.aurinko.io and Reclaim.ai at https://mcp.reclaim.ai.

Other comparisons with Aurinko Calendar API or Reclaim.ai

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.