Head to head · Diagram create · October 2026 research run
Cloudviz API vs Lucid API + MCP
Lucid API + MCP has a score of 60.9 (C) against Cloudviz API's 37.9 (F). Both do diagram create. The largest gap is reliability, 47 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Cloudviz API for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick Lucid API + MCP for
- reliability (+47)
- schema & documentation (+15)
- agent ergonomics (+12)
- security & auth (+27)
- payments & pricing (+5)
- maintenance & community (+28)
- transparency & trust (+16)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cloudviz API | Lucid API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 20 | 67 | Lucid API + MCP +47 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 73 | Lucid API + MCP +15 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 50 | 62 | Lucid API + MCP +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 53 | 80 | Lucid API + MCP +27 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 25 | Lucid API + MCP +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 5 | 33 | Lucid API + MCP +28 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 47 | 63 | Lucid API + MCP +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 37.9 · F | 60.9 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cloudviz API | Lucid API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Cloudviz | Lucid Software |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.cloudviz.io | https://api.lucid.co |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | proprietary |
| Tools exposed | none | 9 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | app.lucid.mcp/lucid |
| Last release | none | 2026-06-15 |
| Popularity | none | none |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cloudviz API
Diagrams come from the live AWS account through a read-only cross-account role with a per-customer external ID. AWS only, and API access starts at the $49 a month Team plan.
Lucid API + MCP
OAuth 2.0 scopes with :readonly variants, and audit log endpoints in the REST API. No public changelog for the API or the MCP server.
Before you call either
Cloudviz API
- Call
GET /aws/accounts/first to get the Cloudviz account ID, then request/aws/accounts/{account-id}/{region}/{format} - On a 202, wait and repeat the same GET until the diagram is ready
- Ask for
jsonSnapshotorjsonDiagram(there is no plainjsonformat) when the agent has to reason over resources - Use a read-only key unless the agent has to add, change or delete AWS accounts
Lucid API + MCP
- Always send
Lucid-Api-Version: 1, or prefix the path with /v1 - For flowcharts and sequence diagrams, post Mermaid markup (up to 100,000 characters) instead of building Standard Import JSON
- Request
:readonlyscopes when the agent only reads documents - On 429, wait 60 seconds or back off. Create Mermaid Diagram allows 60 calls a minute
- Sharing and embed endpoints need an OAuth token. An API key won't work there
Other comparisons with Cloudviz API or Lucid API + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs Diagrams.so API + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs draw.io + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs Eraser API + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs Mermaid Chart MCP
- Cloudviz API vs Structurizr + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs tldraw SDK + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs Whimsical MCP
- Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Lucid API + MCP
- draw.io + MCP vs Lucid API + MCP
- Eraser API + MCP vs Lucid API + MCP
- Lucid API + MCP vs Mermaid Chart MCP
- Lucid API + MCP vs Structurizr + MCP
- Lucid API + MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP
- Lucid API + MCP vs Whimsical MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/cloudviz.json·/api/v1/tools/lucid.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/cloudviz-vs-lucid.md