Head to head · Diagram create · October 2026 research run
Cloudviz API vs draw.io + MCP
draw.io + MCP has a score of 62.4 (B) against Cloudviz API's 37.9 (F). Both do diagram create. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 81 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Cloudviz API for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick draw.io + MCP for
- reliability (+30)
- schema & documentation (+24)
- payments & pricing (+40)
- maintenance & community (+81)
- transparency & trust (+27)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cloudviz API | draw.io + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 20 | 50 | draw.io + MCP +30 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 82 | draw.io + MCP +24 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 50 | 49 | Cloudviz API +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 53 | 55 | draw.io + MCP +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 60 | draw.io + MCP +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 5 | 86 | draw.io + MCP +81 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 47 | 74 | draw.io + MCP +27 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 37.9 · F | 62.4 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cloudviz API | draw.io + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |
| Vendor | Cloudviz | draw.io |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.cloudviz.io | https://mcp.draw.io/mcp |
| Transports | HTTP | Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | 2 |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.draw/mcp |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-01 |
| Popularity | none | 8.5k stars, 25k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 4/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cloudviz API
Diagrams come from the live AWS account through a read-only cross-account role with a per-customer external ID. AWS only, and API access starts at the $49 a month Team plan.
draw.io + MCP
Free, keyless and Apache 2.0, with a Docker image for self-hosting. Tool descriptions embed a 34.5 KB XML reference and a 14 KB Mermaid reference, roughly 13,000 tokens.
Before you call either
Cloudviz API
- Call
GET /aws/accounts/first to get the Cloudviz account ID, then request/aws/accounts/{account-id}/{region}/{format} - On a 202, wait and repeat the same GET until the diagram is ready
- Ask for
jsonSnapshotorjsonDiagram(there is no plainjsonformat) when the agent has to reason over resources - Use a read-only key unless the agent has to add, change or delete AWS accounts
draw.io + MCP
- Pass
mermaidtocreate_diagramfor any type on its Mermaid list. Usexmlonly for icons, mockups or hand-placed layouts - Call
search_shapesbefore writing XML with cloud or network icons, so the style strings are exact - Set
postLayout: "elk"for flowcharts orrouting: "libavoid"for hand-placed diagrams, never both - Use the npm server or the plugin when the diagram mustn't leave the machine. The hosted App sends it to draw.io's server
- Expect the tool list to cost about 13,000 tokens before the first call
Other comparisons with Cloudviz API or draw.io + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs Diagrams.so API + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs Eraser API + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs Lucid API + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs Mermaid Chart MCP
- Cloudviz API vs Structurizr + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs tldraw SDK + MCP
- Cloudviz API vs Whimsical MCP
- Diagrams.so API + MCP vs draw.io + MCP
- draw.io + MCP vs Eraser API + MCP
- draw.io + MCP vs Lucid API + MCP
- draw.io + MCP vs Mermaid Chart MCP
- draw.io + MCP vs Structurizr + MCP
- draw.io + MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP
- draw.io + MCP vs Whimsical MCP
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/cloudviz.json·/api/v1/tools/drawio.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/cloudviz-vs-drawio.md