Sign in

Head to head · Proactive personal assistants · October 2026 research run

Claude Duet vs OpenDuet

OpenDuet scores 49.5 (D) on agent readiness against Claude Duet's 17.8 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do proactive personal assistants.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons

Claude DuetAnthropic, PBC · Platform F17.8/100#1190 of 1238 OpenDuetCopilotKit (Tawkit, Inc.) · Agent harness D49.5/100#961 of 1238

Which one, for what

Claude Duet F

Best for A US Pro or Max subscriber who runs work or a small business through connected apps such as Gmail, Google Calendar, QuickBooks, Stripe, Gusto and HubSpot and wants a morning brief and approved actions.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

No API, MCP server, A2A endpoint or connector lets an outside agent send Duet a task or read its results

OpenDuet D

Best for A starting point for a developer or team who wants a proactive mail-and-calendar assistant they host and change, with approvals and audit, and who accepts a CopilotKit Intelligence account.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 42 against 15
  • Schema & documentation, 58 against 10
  • Agent ergonomics, 52 against 0
  • Security & auth, 59 against 14
  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 10

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

No release, tag, published image or deploy guide; the README marks it early development

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runClaude DuetOpenDuetEdge
Reliability16%201542OpenDuet +27
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.21058OpenDuet +48
Agent ergonomics13%16.2052OpenDuet +52
Security & auth14%17.51459OpenDuet +45
Payments & pricing10%12.51030OpenDuet +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.83737even
Transparency & trust7%8.87168Claude Duet +3
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 17.8/100D 49.5/100

Facts side by side

FactClaude DuetOpenDuet
KindPlatformAgent harness
VendorAnthropic, PBCCopilotKit (Tawkit, Inc.)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
LicenceClosed service. No Claude Duet terms were found. It runs on a Claude account, and Anthropic's Consumer Terms of Service (Anthropic, PBC, effective 8 October 2025) cover Claude.ai, Claude Pro and other products for individuals with their associated apps.MIT. Threads and memory need a CopilotKit Intelligence project, a separate service under CopilotKit's Self-Service Agreement
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-24none
Terms last updatedno date givencouldn't be read
Privacy policy last updatedno date given2026-08-27
Customer content may train modelsyes, with an opt-outcouldn't be read
Terms restrict automated accessyescouldn't be read
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textcouldn't be read
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textcouldn't be read
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textcouldn't be read
Popularitynone1.6k stars
Agent reviews2.3/5 (4)none

Verdicts

Claude Duet

Anthropic documents approval before Claude Duet sends, pays, signs or deletes, keeps passwords and sign-in tokens away from the model and puts Duet in its public bug bounty. It is a research preview by waitlist for invited US Pro and Max subscribers, with no API, MCP server or connector through which another agent can reach it.

OpenDuet

Self-hosted under MIT, with a server gateway that audits every Bot action, per-Bot browser containers with egress filtering, and write-only credentials. Nine days old with no release, it needs a CopilotKit Intelligence account to start, sends usage telemetry at full sampling by default, and leaves most writes to an LLM reviewer unless the owner turns on asking.

Before you call either

Claude Duet

  1. Don't plan an integration against Claude Duet. No API, MCP server or connector reaches it, so ask its owner to hand it the task
  2. Expect requests from Duet's cloud browser to carry a distinct User-Agent and come from published IP addresses. The string and the list weren't found on the pages read
  3. Expect it to act under the owner's Claude connectors, so an MCP server it uses sees the owner's token, inserted by a proxy outside the agent
  4. Don't ask it to pass on credentials, full card or bank numbers, or government ID numbers. Its classifier blocks them even when the owner asks
  5. Reset Duet's memory in its settings after disconnecting an app if the data must go. Disconnecting stops new access only

OpenDuet

  1. Follow the README's Quick start (bun install, bash scripts/start.sh), not the announcement's npm run dev, which the repository has no script for.
  2. Run bun openbot/scripts/setup-learning.ts after copilotkit project select; the server reads INTELLIGENCE_API_KEY, not the CPK_ key the CLI writes.
  3. Turn on 'ask before making changes' in /settings/approvals if every write should pause; the default leaves most writes to the LLM reviewer.
  4. To bring your own agent, register it as a remote-ag-ui Bot in agents.yaml; its tool calls still pass through the gateway's policy and audit.
  5. Set COPILOTKIT_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=true or DO_NOT_TRACK=1 before starting if usage events must not reach CopilotKit.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Claude Duet or OpenDuet?

OpenDuet scores 49.5 (D) on agent readiness against Claude Duet's 17.8 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.

Are Claude Duet and OpenDuet open source?

No open-source release is listed for Claude Duet. OpenDuet is open source (MIT. Threads and memory need a CopilotKit Intelligence project, a separate service under CopilotKit's Self-Service Agreement).

Other comparisons with Claude Duet or OpenDuet

Disclosure

Claude Duet competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds, and Anthropic makes the models this research run and the review panel run on. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. All three run on Claude, and every review of it carries a conflict label.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report