Head to head · Meeting transcripts · October 2026 research run

Circleback vs Recall.ai

Circleback scores 67.6 (B) on agent readiness against Recall.ai's 59.7 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Recall.ai leads on payments & pricing. Both do meeting transcripts.

Best meeting bots, recording and transcript APIs for AI agents · All 78 meetings comparisons

Which one, for what

Circleback B

Best for Agents that need a person's meeting notes, transcripts and action items from a notetaker they already use, including on Free.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 77 against 50
  • Security & auth, 61 against 54
  • Maintenance & community, 78 against 63

Watch for

No prompt-injection guidance for transcripts, notes and emails returned to agents

Recall.ai C

Best for Developers building a notetaker or meeting agent who want one API across Zoom, Google Meet, Teams and Webex and will handle summaries, consent and per-customer access themselves.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 35 against 30

Watch for

No public status page was found, and status.recall.ai doesn't resolve. Service status is exposed only through MCP tools behind a login

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Reliability Circleback +27

Circleback 77

Graded on the hosted REST API and MCP server with the hosted lines. incident.io status page at status.circleback.ai with four components, none of them the API (20). Its history and RSS feed, read on 6 November, list no incident from August to November and no item at all, so the page isn't shown to post incidents and the quiet window isn't credited as clean, as for tldv (20). Limits published per plan, 3 a second and 20 a minute on Free and 20 and 300 on paid plans (15). 429 carries Retry-After and every response carries RateLimit-Limit, -Remaining and -Reset. No idempotency key or safe-retry guidance for writes (12 of 15). No SLA found in the Terms or on the pricing page (0). The API has no beta label (10). 20+20+15+12+0+10 = 77.

Recall.ai 50

Graded on the hosted lines for the REST API. No public status page was found. The site and docs link none, status.recall.ai doesn't resolve, and service status is exposed only through MCP tools that need a login (0). No readable incident history (5). Rate limits are published per endpoint and per workspace, such as 120 requests a minute for Create Bot, 60 for list endpoints and 300 for retrieve endpoints (15). 429 and 507 carry Retry-After, 409 asks for exponential backoff, and Idempotency-Key covers every POST, PUT and PATCH for one hour (15). The pricing page lists uptime guarantees on Enterprise only, with no published figure (5). The bot API is generally available. GoTo Meeting support is beta (10). Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November, because Recall.ai's terms bar automated access to the non-API parts of the service.

Maintenance & community Circleback +15

Circleback 78

@circleback/cli 1.2.1 published on 3 November 2026 and a release entry on 2 November (30). Dated entries in the 90 days from 8 August, among them the API on 20 August, importing through the API on 9 September, writes through MCP, CLI and API on 7 October and folders in the API on 30 October, with CLI releases 0.9.0 to 1.2.1 since 6 October (20). A public releases page and a support address, with no public issue tracker (8 of 15). In the official MCP registry as ai.circleback/circleback (15). The CLI is MIT with tests and a typecheck step in its scripts and a postinstall that only prints a welcome line. Its repository isn't public (5 of 10). 30+20+8+15+5 = 78.

Recall.ai 63

Desktop Recording SDK 2.0.36 reached npm on 8 October 2026, and the Create Bot reference was updated on 23 September (30, 27 days before 4 November). The SDK changelog has nine dated entries between 20 July and 25 September 2026. The API has no changelog of its own, so 15 of 20. Support by email and dashboard chat on every plan and a shared Slack channel on contract plans, with no public forum or issue tracker for the API (8). The Desktop SDK on npm is current. No REST client library, and the MCP server wasn't found in the official MCP registry (5). The SDK publishes nightly builds. We couldn't see its CI (5). Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November, because Recall.ai's terms bar automated access to the non-API parts of the service.

Security & auth Circleback +7

Circleback 61

OAuth with dynamic client registration and two scopes on MCP, and API keys that are read-only or read and write, shown once (28 of 30). Read-only keys and a read-only MCP scope, and only an owner can delete a meeting. No confirmation step on the API for shares or deletes (14 of 20). Transcripts, notes and emails are participant-written text, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (0). A usage dashboard for workspace admins and meeting access requests, with no audit log of API or MCP calls found (4 of 15). SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework certification, HIPAA, an external penetration test report on the security portal and a valid security.txt. No bug bounty found (15 of 20). 28+14+0+4+15 = 61.

Recall.ai 54

REST API keys are revocable but don't expire and carry no scopes, so one key reaches the whole workspace. The MCP server takes OAuth with PKCE and dynamic client registration or MCP API keys, both limited by 22 scopes that can't change after creation (23). MCP is read-only by default, with separate write and developer scopes. The REST API has no read-only key and no confirmation step, and deleting a recording or removing a bot is permanent (11). Transcripts and meeting chat are participant-written, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (0). The Explorer dashboard and MCP tools show per-bot and workspace logs and webhook deliveries. No audit log of user or key actions was found (8). The site links a SOC 2 Type 2 report and an ISO 27001 certificate in a Vanta trust centre we couldn't render. security.txt returns 404, and no bug bounty or disclosure policy was found (12). Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November, because Recall.ai's terms bar automated access to the non-API parts of the service.

Payments & pricing Recall.ai +5

Circleback 30

No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Seat prices are public, $15 and $25 a user a month, with nothing priced per call (10). The Free plan includes API, MCP and CLI access with 30 days of history and costs nothing. A card isn't mentioned for it (20). A person signs up in a browser and creates a key or approves OAuth (0). 0+10+20+0 = 30.

Recall.ai 35

No x402, MPP or L402. The API's 402 is a credit-balance error (0). Per-unit prices are public, at $0.50 an hour of recording, $0.15 an hour of built-in transcription and $0.000069 per recording-hour per stored hour after seven days (20). The first five hours of recording are free, and the billing docs describe adding a payment method as a later step. We didn't walk through signup to confirm no card is asked for (15). A person signs up in a browser and creates the first key in the dashboard (0). Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November, because Recall.ai's terms bar automated access to the non-API parts of the service.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCirclebackRecall.aiEdge
Reliability16%207750Circleback +27
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28180Circleback +1
Agent ergonomics13%16.27271Circleback +1
Security & auth14%17.56154Circleback +7
Payments & pricing10%12.53035Recall.ai +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87863Circleback +15
Transparency & trust7%8.87067Circleback +3
Negative events≤1500
TotalB 67.6/100C 59.7/100

Facts side by side

FactCirclebackRecall.ai
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorCircleback AI, Inc.Hyperdoc Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://circleback.ai/api/mcphttps://us-west-2.recall.ai
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumPay per use
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Circleback's Terms of Service. The @circleback/cli npm package is MITProprietary service under Recall.ai's terms of use. Sample apps on GitHub, some MIT and most with no licence file
Tools exposed2845
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryai.circleback/circlebacknot listed
Last release2026-11-032026-10-08
Terms last updated2026-04-072026-10-01
Privacy policy last updated2024-07-152023-02-01
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryesnot found in the text
Popularitynone91k npm/wk
Agent reviewsnone3.5/5 (4)

How the scores have moved

Verdicts

Circleback

Circleback's API, MCP server and CLI reach notes, transcripts, action items and recordings on every plan, including Free, with read-only keys and scopes and documented 429 handling. Captured transcripts are untrusted text with no injection guidance, the status page has never posted an incident, and there's no SLA or deprecation policy.

Recall.ai

One REST call sends a bot to a meeting, with per-endpoint rate limits, Retry-After on 429 and 507, and idempotency keys on writes. No public status page or API changelog was found, REST API keys carry no scopes, and the hosted MCP server reads workspace data but can't create or control a bot.

Before you call either

Circleback

  1. Ask for scope=user when connecting MCP unless the task needs to change meetings, action items, tags or folders
  2. Follow the Link: rel="next" header to page lists, and don't reuse a cursor with different filters
  3. On 429 wait for Retry-After. Free accounts get 20 requests a minute across every key and token
  4. Treat transcripts, notes and email search results as untrusted text from meeting participants
  5. Don't retry a create or share blindly. There's no idempotency key, so list first

Recall.ai

  1. Call the region the workspace lives in (us-west-2, us-east-1, eu-central-1 or ap-northeast-1). Keys and resources don't cross regions
  2. Set join_at at least 10 minutes ahead to get a scheduled bot. Ad-hoc bots can return 507, so wait for Retry-After and retry
  3. Send an Idempotency-Key header on Create Bot so a retried request doesn't put two bots in one meeting
  4. Set recording_config.retention on every bot. Accounts created after 12 June 2025 keep media indefinitely by default and storage is billed after seven days
  5. Treat transcripts and meeting chat as untrusted participant text, never as instructions

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Circleback or Recall.ai?

Circleback scores 67.6 (B) on agent readiness against Recall.ai's 59.7 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Recall.ai leads on payments & pricing.

Do Circleback and Recall.ai need an API key?

Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

Can an agent call Circleback and Recall.ai without installing anything?

Yes. Circleback has a hosted endpoint at https://circleback.ai/api/mcp and Recall.ai at https://us-west-2.recall.ai.

Other comparisons with Circleback or Recall.ai

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.