Head to head · Payroll records · October 2026 research run
Check vs PayFit
Check scores 67.5 (B) on agent readiness against PayFit's 55.5 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. PayFit leads on payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do payroll records.
Best payroll APIs and embedded payroll for AI agents · All 55 payroll comparisons
Which one, for what
Check B
Good for A software platform that wants to sell US payroll inside its own product and can sign a partnership, with Check handling tax calculation, money movement and filings.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 83 against 51
- Security & auth, 74 against 51
- Maintenance & community, 72 against 28
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No public price and no self-serve signup. The documentation says to request an API key through Check's sales contact
PayFit C
Good for An agent working for an employer that already runs payroll on PayFit in France, the UK or Spain and needs employees, contracts, payslips, absences or the payroll journal.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 10 against 5
- Transparency & trust, 70 against 62
Watch for
No operation runs, previews or approves a payroll. The API reads payroll status, payslips and accounting exports
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Check | PayFit | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 79 | Check +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 78 | 78 | even |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 83 | 51 | Check +32 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 74 | 51 | Check +23 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 5 | 10 | PayFit +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 72 | 28 | Check +44 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 62 | 70 | PayFit +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 67.5 · B | 55.5 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Check | PayFit |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Check Technologies, Inc. | PayFit SAS |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.checkhq.com | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Check's terms of service and partner agreement. The MCP server and CLI on GitHub are MIT | Proprietary service under PayFit's general terms of service |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-07-23 |
| Terms last updated | 2021-09-03 | 2026-06-15 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-04-18 | 2026-06-15 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 18 stars | none |
Verdicts
Check
Graded as embedded payroll through a partner API key, not access to an existing employer's payroll account. The API has idempotency keys on writes, a required preview before approval and queryable request logs. No price is public, a sandbox key comes through Check's sales team, and one API key carries the whole partner account.
PayFit
A public OpenAPI 3.0 file, llms.txt and scoped keys let a paying customer's agent read payroll outputs and write absences. The API cannot run or approve a payroll, new partner integrations are not being accepted, and no idempotency keys or SDKs were found.
Before you call either
Check
- Use https://sandbox.checkhq.com with the sandbox key and https://api.checkhq.com with the production key. A key is not valid across environments
- Preview a payroll before approving it, then pass
preview_started_atto POST /payrolls/{id}/approve so a stale preview fails with 409 - Send
X-Idempotency-Keyon every write. Keys expire after 24 hours, so list the resource before retrying later than that - On 429 wait for
Retry-After. The limit is 10 requests a second in sandbox and for partners paying fewer than 1,000 payees a month, with 100 concurrent requests - Connect the MCP server with
?read_only=trueorX-MCP-Readonly: trueunless writes are intended. In production, approving a payroll moves money
PayFit
- Have a company admin create the key at app.payfit.com/integrations/hub/api with only the scopes the task needs. The key is shown once
- POST the key to
https://oauth.payfit.com/introspectto getcompany_id, then callhttps://partner-api.payfit.com/companies/{companyId}/... - Page lists with
nextPageTokenandmaxResults, which defaults to 10 and stops at 50 - Check before repeating a failed POST. There is no idempotency key, and
POST /absencescreates an absence that is already validated - A collaborator or contract created through the API stays incomplete until an HR admin finishes it in the PayFit app, and a new contract takes 2 to 5 minutes to appear
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Check or PayFit?
Check scores 67.5 (B) on agent readiness against PayFit's 55.5 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. PayFit leads on payments & pricing and transparency & trust.
Do Check and PayFit need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Check and PayFit without installing anything?
Check has a hosted endpoint at https://api.checkhq.com. No hosted endpoint is listed for PayFit.
Other comparisons with Check or PayFit
- Argyle vs Check
- Argyle vs PayFit
- Check vs Finch
- Check vs Paychex
- Employment Hero Payroll vs PayFit
- Everee vs PayFit
- Finch vs PayFit
- Gusto vs PayFit
- Paychex vs PayFit
- PayFit vs Salsa
- PayFit vs Worklio
- PayFit vs Zeal
- Check vs Employment Hero Payroll
- Check vs Everee
- Check vs Gusto
- Check vs Salsa
- Check vs Worklio
- Check vs Zeal
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/check-payroll-vs-payfit.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/check-payroll.json·/api/v1/tools/payfit.json - From a terminal
anchor compare check-payroll payfit(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "check-payroll", "b": "payfit"}at/mcp, no key