Head to head · Payroll employees · October 2026 research run
Argyle vs Check
Check scores 67.5 (B) on agent readiness against Argyle's 63.7 (B), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Argyle leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do payroll employees.
Which one, for what
Argyle B
Good for A lender, tenant screener, benefits agency or background checker whose applicant can sign in to a payroll or gig account, and who needs paystubs, employment records or an income report.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 86 against 78
- Payments & pricing, 15 against 5
- Transparency & trust, 83 against 62
Watch for
No price is published. The site has no pricing page, and fees are set in a Service Order agreed with sales
Check B
Good for A software platform that wants to sell US payroll inside its own product and can sign a partnership, with Check handling tax calculation, money movement and filings.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 83 against 58
- Security & auth, 74 against 48
Watch for
No public price and no self-serve signup. The documentation says to request an API key through Check's sales contact
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Argyle | Check | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 81 | 80 | Argyle +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 86 | 78 | Argyle +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 58 | 83 | Check +25 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 48 | 74 | Check +26 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 15 | 5 | Argyle +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 75 | 72 | Argyle +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 83 | 62 | Argyle +21 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63.7 · B | 67.5 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Argyle | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Argyle Systems Inc. | Check Technologies, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.argyle.com/v2 | https://api.checkhq.com |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Argyle's Open Payroll Customer Terms. The React Native Link SDK on npm is Apache 2.0 | Proprietary service under Check's terms of service and partner agreement. The MCP server and CLI on GitHub are MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2021-09-03 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | 2024-04-18 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 481 npm/wk | 18 stars |
Verdicts
Argyle
Graded on the REST API. One OpenAPI file covers 91 operations, llms.txt indexes Markdown docs, and a Sandbox with sample users comes with a Console sign-up. Every payroll connection needs the worker to sign in through Link. No prices are published, no idempotency keys were found, and API keys carry no per-key scopes.
Check
Graded as embedded payroll through a partner API key, not access to an existing employer's payroll account. The API has idempotency keys on writes, a required preview before approval and queryable request logs. No price is public, a sandbox key comes through Check's sales team, and one API key carries the whole partner account.
Before you call either
Argyle
- Send HTTP Basic auth with
api_key_idas the username andapi_key_secretas the password. Sandbox keys fail with 401 on Production and the reverse - Create the user with
POST /v2/usersand anexternal_id, then look it up byexternal_idbefore retrying. No idempotency key was found - Do not read data straight after an account connects. Wait for the account and data webhooks, or for the verification status, before fetching records
- Follow the full URL in
nextwhen paging. Do not build cursor values or fetch pages in parallel.limitdefaults to 10 and stops at 200 - Stay under 50 requests a second. On 429, queue the request and retry later, not at once
- Treat
DELETE /v2/users/{id}as permanent. It removes every resource tied to that user, with no confirmation step
Check
- Use https://sandbox.checkhq.com with the sandbox key and https://api.checkhq.com with the production key. A key is not valid across environments
- Preview a payroll before approving it, then pass
preview_started_atto POST /payrolls/{id}/approve so a stale preview fails with 409 - Send
X-Idempotency-Keyon every write. Keys expire after 24 hours, so list the resource before retrying later than that - On 429 wait for
Retry-After. The limit is 10 requests a second in sandbox and for partners paying fewer than 1,000 payees a month, with 100 concurrent requests - Connect the MCP server with
?read_only=trueorX-MCP-Readonly: trueunless writes are intended. In production, approving a payroll moves money
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Argyle or Check?
Check scores 67.5 (B) on agent readiness against Argyle's 63.7 (B), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Argyle leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.
Do Argyle and Check need an API key?
Argyle needs an API key. Check takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Argyle and Check without installing anything?
Yes. Argyle has a hosted endpoint at https://api.argyle.com/v2 and Check at https://api.checkhq.com.
Other comparisons with Argyle or Check
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/argyle-vs-check-payroll.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/argyle.json·/api/v1/tools/check-payroll.json - From a terminal
anchor compare argyle check-payroll(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "argyle", "b": "check-payroll"}at/mcp, no key