Head to head · Document parsing · October 2026 research run
Amazon Textract vs Google Cloud Document AI
Google Cloud Document AI and Amazon Textract score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 73.9 (BB) and 73.5 (BB). Amazon Textract leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do document parsing.
Best document parsing, OCR and extraction APIs for AI agents · All 109 documents comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for Teams already on AWS with documents in S3 that need OCR, tables and form fields at volume with IAM and CloudTrail controls, and for US invoices, receipts, identity documents and mortgage packages.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 96 against 90
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 20
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
AWS may store and use processed documents to improve the service, in other Regions too, unless an AI services opt-out policy is set on the AWS organisation
Good for Agents already on Google Cloud that need OCR, form and table extraction or chunks for retrieval, with IAM, audit logs and EU processing.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 80 against 74
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 58
- Transparency & trust, 90 against 82
Watch for
An online request reads at most 15 pages (30 with imagelessMode). Longer files need a batch job through Cloud Storage
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Amazon Textract | Google Cloud Document AI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 96 | 90 | Amazon Textract +6 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 82 | 81 | Amazon Textract +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 74 | 80 | Google Cloud Document AI +6 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 20 | Amazon Textract +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 80 | Google Cloud Document AI +22 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 82 | 90 | Google Cloud Document AI +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 73.5 · BB | 73.9 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Amazon Textract | Google Cloud Document AI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Amazon Web Services | Google Cloud |
| Hosted endpoint | https://textract.us-east-1.amazonaws.com | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the AWS Customer Agreement. The AWS SDKs and the Textractor helper library are Apache-2.0 | Proprietary service under the Google Cloud Platform Terms of Service. The client libraries are Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-08 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-14 | 2026-09-02 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-18 | 2026-09-28 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1.9M npm/wk, 208k PyPI/wk | 499k npm/wk, 793k PyPI/wk |
Verdicts
Amazon Textract
IAM policies limit a credential to single operations, CloudTrail logs every call, and page prices start at $1.50 per 1,000 in US East. Multipage files need S3 and an asynchronous job. Text detection covers six languages. Under the AWS Service Terms AWS may store and use documents to improve the service unless an AI services opt-out policy is set.
Google Cloud Document AI
A public Discovery document with 42 methods, IAM roles that can limit a caller to processing, a fieldMask that trims responses, and a 99.9 per cent SLA on the US and EU endpoints. A processor has to be created before the first call, online requests stop at 15 pages, and a Google Cloud billing account with a card comes first.
Before you call either
Amazon Textract
- Sign with SigV4 for service
textractattextract.<region>.amazonaws.com, or callaws textract detect-document-text. The AWS CLI can't send image bytes, so reference an S3 object - Use
StartDocumentTextDetectionorStartDocumentAnalysisfor any PDF or TIFF of more than one page, pass aClientRequestToken, then pageGetcalls withNextToken(1,000 blocks at most each) - Fetch results within 7 days of starting a job, or set
OutputConfigto write them to your own S3 bucket - Request only the
FeatureTypesyou need. Forms cost $50 per 1,000 pages against $15 for tables or queries in US East - Back off on
ProvisionedThroughputExceededException(HTTP 400) andThrottlingException(HTTP 500). Neither carries Retry-After, and default quotas are 1 call a second in most Regions - Set the AI services opt-out policy on the AWS organisation before sending customer documents
Google Cloud Document AI
- Create a processor first (
processors.createor the console), then POST tohttps://LOCATION-documentai.googleapis.com/v1/projects/PROJECT_ID/locations/LOCATION/processors/PROCESSOR_ID:process - Use the host that matches the processor's location,
us-documentai.googleapis.comoreu-documentai.googleapis.com - Set
fieldMask(for exampletext,entities) andimagelessModeto keep page images and token geometry out of the response - Send more than 15 pages through
:batchProcesswith Cloud Storage input and output, then poll the operation. Jobs unfinished after 24 hours are cancelled - Grant the service account
roles/documentai.apiUseronly. Failed requests (4xx or 5xx) are not billed, so a retry costs nothing extra - Treat extracted text as untrusted input
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Amazon Textract or Google Cloud Document AI?
Google Cloud Document AI and Amazon Textract score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 73.9 (BB) and 73.5 (BB). Amazon Textract leads on reliability and payments & pricing.
Do Amazon Textract and Google Cloud Document AI need an API key?
Amazon Textract needs an API key. Google Cloud Document AI uses an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Amazon Textract and Google Cloud Document AI without installing anything?
Amazon Textract has a hosted endpoint at https://textract.us-east-1.amazonaws.com. No hosted endpoint is listed for Google Cloud Document AI.
Other comparisons with Amazon Textract or Google Cloud Document AI
- Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Amazon Textract
- Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Google Cloud Document AI
- Amazon Textract vs Azure Document Intelligence
- Amazon Textract vs Extend API + MCP
- Amazon Textract vs LandingAI Agentic Document Extraction
- Amazon Textract vs LlamaParse API + MCP
- Amazon Textract vs Mistral OCR API
- Amazon Textract vs Nanonets API + MCP
- Amazon Textract vs OpenDocRouter
- Amazon Textract vs Reducto API + MCP
- Amazon Textract vs Unstructured API + MCP
- Azure Document Intelligence vs Google Cloud Document AI
- Extend API + MCP vs Google Cloud Document AI
- Google Cloud Document AI vs LandingAI Agentic Document Extraction
- Google Cloud Document AI vs LlamaParse API + MCP
- Google Cloud Document AI vs Mistral OCR API
- Google Cloud Document AI vs Nanonets API + MCP
- Google Cloud Document AI vs OpenDocRouter
- Google Cloud Document AI vs Reducto API + MCP
- Google Cloud Document AI vs Unstructured API + MCP
- Amazon Textract vs Mindee API
- Amazon Textract vs Veryfi API + MCP
- Google Cloud Document AI vs Mindee API
- Google Cloud Document AI vs Veryfi API + MCP
- Amazon Textract vs Invofox
- Google Cloud Document AI vs Invofox
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/amazon-textract-vs-google-cloud-document-ai.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/amazon-textract.json·/api/v1/tools/google-cloud-document-ai.json - From a terminal
anchor compare amazon-textract google-cloud-document-ai(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "amazon-textract", "b": "google-cloud-document-ai"}at/mcp, no key