Head to head · Forms responses · October 2026 research run
Alchemer vs Fillout
Fillout scores 52.2 (D) on agent readiness against Alchemer's 41.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Alchemer leads on security & auth. Both do forms responses.
Which one, for what
Alchemer E
Good for A company already on an Alchemer Business Platform contract that wants an agent to build surveys, load contacts, send campaigns and export responses.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 44 against 37
Watch for
The pricing page says API access is for Business Platform accounts only, which are quoted by sales
Fillout D
Good for An agent that reads form responses, files submissions on a person's behalf or subscribes a webhook to a form someone has already built.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 35
- Schema & documentation, 63 against 45
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
- Transparency & trust, 69 against 61
Watch for
No operation creates or edits a form. Zite's MCP server lists forms and its docs say creating forms is not supported over MCP
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Alchemer | Fillout | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 70 | Fillout +35 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 45 | 63 | Fillout +18 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 47 | 47 | even |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 37 | Alchemer +7 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 30 | Fillout +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 45 | 46 | Fillout +1 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 69 | Fillout +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 41.4 · E | 52.2 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Alchemer | Fillout |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Alchemer LLC | Restly, Inc. (trading as Zite) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.alchemer.com/v5 | https://api.fillout.com/v1/api |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| Price for forms responses | not published | $15 per month (plan) |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Alchemer Software as a Service Agreement | Proprietary service under Fillout's terms of service. The TypeScript API client on GitHub is MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2026-01-14 | 2022-07-02 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-04-23 | 2025-10-07 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | none | 1.8k npm/wk |
Verdicts
Alchemer
Alchemer's REST API v5 covers surveys, questions, responses, contacts and email campaigns in 101 documented operations, with a reference rewritten in April 2026. The pricing page limits API access to Business Platform accounts quoted by sales. Keys travel in the URL query string, and no status page, OpenAPI document or SDK was found.
Fillout
Fillout's REST API is on every plan, the free one included, with a public OpenAPI 3.0.1 spec, llms.txt and submission filters by date, status and text. It has eight operations and none creates or edits a form. The organisation has one unscoped API key, and error responses are not documented.
Before you call either
Alchemer
- Use the host for the account's region (
api.alchemer.com,api.alchemer.eu,api.alchemer-ca.comorapi.au.alchemer.com). The wrong host returns a 401 login failure even with valid keys - Create with PUT and update with POST. The API reverses the usual meaning of the two methods
- Do not repeat an identical request inside 60 seconds. GET results are cached for 60 seconds and a repeat can return 429
- Stay under 240 requests a minute for the account and slow down when the
X-SG-Warningheader appears - Wait up to five minutes before reading back a response that was just submitted, and expect a 500 after a 30 second timeout
Fillout
- Build the form in the Fillout editor first. The API reads forms and writes submissions but can't create a form or change its questions
- Read the base URL from the Developer settings page. EU-hosted accounts use https://eu-api.fillout.com/v1/api
- Stay under 5 requests a second per key and read the
ratelimit-remainingandratelimit-resetresponse headers - Page submissions with
limit(at most 150) andoffset, and stop atpageCount.status=in_progressreturns unfinished ones - Send at most 10 submissions per create call and don't retry blindly, because the call has no idempotency key
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Alchemer or Fillout?
Fillout scores 52.2 (D) on agent readiness against Alchemer's 41.4 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Alchemer leads on security & auth.
Do Alchemer and Fillout need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Alchemer and Fillout without installing anything?
Yes. Alchemer has a hosted endpoint at https://api.alchemer.com/v5 and Fillout at https://api.fillout.com/v1/api.
Other comparisons with Alchemer or Fillout
- Alchemer vs Paperform
- Alchemer vs Wufoo
- Fillout vs Formbricks
- Fillout vs Formstack
- Fillout vs Google Forms API
- Fillout vs Jotform
- Fillout vs Paperform
- Fillout vs SurveyMonkey
- Fillout vs Tally
- Fillout vs Typeform
- Fillout vs Wufoo
- Alchemer vs Formbricks
- Alchemer vs Formstack
- Alchemer vs Google Forms API
- Alchemer vs Jotform
- Alchemer vs SurveyMonkey
- Alchemer vs Tally
- Alchemer vs Typeform
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/alchemer-vs-fillout.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/alchemer.json·/api/v1/tools/fillout.json - From a terminal
anchor compare alchemer fillout(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "alchemer", "b": "fillout"}at/mcp, no key