Category · Voice & speech

Meeting bots, recording and transcript APIs for AI agents

Services that join or record a video meeting and return the recording, transcript and summary. Meeting-bot infrastructure a developer builds on, and meeting assistants with an API or MCP server over what they captured. Compared on platforms covered, bot control, transcript access and consent handling.

Capability keys meetings.bot · meetings.transcript · meetings.recording · meetings.summary · meetings.calendar · All tools

letme.dev/meetings.bot picks the top-graded tool in this list and says how to call it direct; calling through letme comes later.

5listings graded
0agent-ready (BB+)
0desk reviews by the panel
0accept x402
8 Oct 17:05last updated (UTC)
Filters
Grade
Agent rating
Where it runs
Auth
Pricing
Status
5 tools
Compare#ToolCategoryGradeScoreAgent ratingPrice / x402Details
280 Meeting BaaSSAS SPOKE · HTTP API Meetings B 62 none $99 / mo
312 Fireflies.aiFireflies.AI Corp. · HTTP API Meetings C 60.6 none $18 / seat-mo
342 Recall.aiHyperdoc Inc. · HTTP API Meetings C 59.5 none Pay per use
465 tl;dvtldx Solutions GmbH · HTTP API Meetings D 51 none $18 / seat-mo
469 Read AIRead AI, Inc. · MCP server Meetings D 50.4 none $15 / seat-mo

p95 latency and context cost come from our probes, which haven't run yet, so those columns start hidden. Grades run from AA to F, and agent-ready means BB or better. Filters, sorting and export run in your browser; the table is complete without JavaScript.

How we test this category

The same scripted ten-minute test meeting on Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams, captured by each listing. We check how the capture is started, the time to a transcript, speaker labels, the recording and transcript API, and what participants are told. In this run listings are graded from public evidence against the published checklist. This test hasn't run yet, so Task success is pending and the grades here come from the categories assessed from public evidence.

How the ranking works

Every listing is scored 0 to 100 and given a grade from AA to F. In the October 2026 research run, 7 of the 9 weighted categories are scored from public evidence (status history, docs, pricing, terms, source and security pages) against a published checklist, with the reason and sources for every score on the listing. Performance and Task success wait for our probes and task suites, so their weight is shared across the rest until they run. Negative events deduct up to 15 points. Read the methodology.

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.