Sovereign AI Act MCP by regulatoryai.eu

MCP server · indexed, not reviewed

HostedLocalvendor's own

Not reviewed

No score, grade or rank. This listing is facts from the official MCP registry and our own checks, and it stays out of the rankings until the panel reviews it.

How the index works

Classify any AI system under the EU AI Act: risk tier + binding Articles, verbatim from the law.

What the official MCP registry says

Facts

MCP registry
eu.regulatoryai/sovereign-ai-act-mcp · 1.4.1
Endpoint
https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp
Packages
npm sovereign-ai-act-mcp stdio
npm / week
69
GitHub stars
0
Registry entry
updated 23 Sep 2026

From the official MCP registry, the package registries and our own checks. JSON · Markdown

Why it's listed

  • It's published in the registry under regulatoryai.eu, a namespace the registry only gives to whoever proves they control that domain.

Being indexed says nothing about quality, and nobody can pay for it. Is this yours? Ask for a review.

Tools it lists 5 · about 498 tokens of context · checked 42 minutes ago

ToolWhat it doesHint
classify_ai_systemClassify an AI system under the EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689): risk tier (prohibited/high_risk/limited/minimal) + Annex III category + binding Articles, grounded verbatim in the law. Use whenever asked if an AI…
lookup_articleVerbatim text of an original EU AI Act Article (1–113) or inserted Article 4a, 60a or 75a–75d.
search_eu_ai_actFull-text search across the EU AI Act corpus (Articles, Recitals, Annexes).
get_compliance_deadlinesCanonical EU AI Act application dates (post Digital-Omnibus) + fine tiers.
review_featureEU AI Act CO-PILOT review for builders: pass a feature, spec or behaviour you are about to ship and get a ship/caution/stop signal (OK / TRANSPARENCY / REVIEW REQUIRED / STOP), the binding Articles, the obligations that…

What https://www.regulatoryai.eu/mcp answered to tools/list, asked without credentials. answered without the initialize handshake. The token figure is the size of the list as sent, divided by four; a model sees about that much before it calls anything. Full definitions, input schemas included, are in the listing's JSON under mcpTools.

How its tools read to an agent 0 errors · 9 warnings · 1 note

  • warnTC11classify_ai_system1 parameter without a description: language
  • warnTC11lookup_articlenone of its 2 parameters has a description
  • warnTC11review_feature1 parameter without a description: language
  • warnTC11search_eu_ai_actnone of its 2 parameters has a description
  • warnTC16classify_ai_systemno readOnlyHint or destructiveHint
  • warnTC16get_compliance_deadlinesno readOnlyHint or destructiveHint
  • warnTC16lookup_articleno readOnlyHint or destructiveHint
  • warnTC16review_featureno readOnlyHint or destructiveHint
  • warnTC16search_eu_ai_actno readOnlyHint or destructiveHint
  • noteTC24server5 of 5 tools have no outputSchema

The checks from /check and anchor check, run each day on the list above: about 498 tokens of definitions. Not part of the score yet. Check your own server.

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.