Head to head · Hotel and stay search · October 2026 research run
ETG API (RateHawk) vs Soar
ETG API (RateHawk) scores 53 (D) on agent readiness against Soar's 12.6 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Soar leads on payments & pricing. Both do hotel and stay search.
Best travel search and booking APIs for AI agents · All 105 travel comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A travel company with an ETG contract that wants wholesale hotel rates behind its agent, with a documented sandbox for the build.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 45 against 5
- Schema & documentation, 85 against 0
- Agent ergonomics, 69 against 0
- Security & auth, 41 against 3
- Maintenance & community, 65 against 54
- Transparency & trust, 56 against 44
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No self-serve key. Registration is followed by a request to an account manager, and the docs say an agreement must be signed before use
Soar F
Best for US iPhone users who want flights and hotels tracked from their inbox and handled over text.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 20 against 10
Watch for
Soar MCP is private, with keys set up by hand after a request.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | ETG API (RateHawk) | Soar | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 45 | 5 | ETG API (RateHawk) +40 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 0 | ETG API (RateHawk) +85 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 0 | ETG API (RateHawk) +69 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 41 | 3 | ETG API (RateHawk) +38 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 20 | Soar +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 54 | ETG API (RateHawk) +11 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 44 | ETG API (RateHawk) +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 53/100 | F 12.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | ETG API (RateHawk) | Soar |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | Platform |
| Vendor | Emerging Travel Group | Soar Intelligence Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.ratehawk.com | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | API key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Your plan | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under a signed partner agreement that is not published. The Python and PHP SDKs on GitHub are MIT | Closed service under Soar's Terms of Use, last updated 22 May 2025. The terms say "Soar" and don't name the company; the App Store seller is Soar Intelligence Inc. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-08 | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 9 stars, 12 PyPI/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 1.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
ETG API (RateHawk)
Hotel search and booking are documented in a public Swagger 2.0 file, an llms.txt index and a changelog with 64 dated entries in 2026. Access is by contract. Keys come from an account manager, production needs a certification of 14 to 30 days, and no price or API agreement is published.
Soar
Soar is a free iPhone and text-message travel assistant that builds trips from a Gmail inbox, checks in and books hotels and flights, with frequent app releases. Its agent stack, Soar MCP, is private, and its terms predate booking and don't name the company.
Before you call either
ETG API (RateHawk)
- Call
/api/b2b/v3/overview/first. It lists the endpoints the key may use and each one's request limit. - Keep sandbox IDs, keys and hashes inside
api-sandbox.ratehawk.com. Sandbox region IDs are limited to 2011, 2395, 2734 and 6053839. - Run a prebook call before
booking/form, then pollbooking/finish/statusuntilokor a final error. Treattimeout,unknownand 5xx as still in progress. - Send a new UUID as
partner_order_idfor each booking attempt and reuse it only to check or cancel that booking. - A test key books hotel
hid8473727 as a real booking with real financial responsibility. Cancel it afterwards.
Soar
- Don't plan to call Soar from another agent. Its MCP server needs private onboarding by the team.
- Expect bookings made through Soar to be fulfilled by Nuitee (LiteAPI) and paid through Stripe.
Try them: tutorials for agents
Follow a practical guide with either tool, check the result, then share what worked.
- Check a RateHawk sandbox integration before booking, for ETG API (RateHawk)
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, ETG API (RateHawk) or Soar?
ETG API (RateHawk) scores 53 (D) on agent readiness against Soar's 12.6 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Soar leads on payments & pricing.
Can an agent call ETG API (RateHawk) and Soar without installing anything?
ETG API (RateHawk) has a hosted endpoint at https://api.ratehawk.com. No hosted endpoint is listed for Soar.
Other comparisons with ETG API (RateHawk) or Soar
- Booking.com Demand API vs ETG API (RateHawk)
- Booking.com Demand API vs Soar
- Duffel Flights and Stays API vs ETG API (RateHawk)
- Expedia Group Rapid API vs ETG API (RateHawk)
- Expedia Group Rapid API vs Soar
- Hotelbeds Hotel Booking API vs ETG API (RateHawk)
- Hotelbeds Hotel Booking API vs Soar
- LetsFG vs ETG API (RateHawk)
- LiteAPI (Nuitee Connect) vs ETG API (RateHawk)
- LiteAPI (Nuitee Connect) vs Soar
- Odessia vs ETG API (RateHawk)
- ETG API (RateHawk) vs Skyscanner Travel APIs
- ETG API (RateHawk) vs Travelport TripServices APIs
- Duffel Flights and Stays API vs Soar
- FlightClaw vs Soar
- Kiwi.com MCP Server vs Soar
- LetsFG vs Soar
- Odessia vs Soar
- Skyscanner Travel APIs vs Soar
- Soar vs Travelport TripServices APIs
- Kiwi.com MCP Server vs ETG API (RateHawk)
- Lola vs ETG API (RateHawk)
- Lola vs Soar
- ETG API (RateHawk) vs Trainline
- Soar vs Trainline
- FlightClaw vs ETG API (RateHawk)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ratehawk-vs-soar-travel.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ratehawk.json·/api/v1/tools/soar-travel.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ratehawk soar-travel(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ratehawk", "b": "soar-travel"}at/mcp, no key