Head to head · Analytics queries · October 2026 research run

Mostly Good Metrics vs PostHog

PostHog scores 67.4 (B) on agent readiness against Mostly Good Metrics's 41.7 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do analytics queries.

Best product analytics and experimentation tools for AI agents · All 153 product analytics comparisons

Which one, for what

Mostly Good Metrics E

Best for Indie and small-team apps that want simple funnels and retention an agent can query.

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where PostHog loses 10 points for them

Watch for

Public beta run by one developer, with no named legal entity in the terms

PostHog B

Best for An agent that answers product questions in SQL or with funnel, retention and trends queries, and that manages feature flags, experiments and error tracking in the same project.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 84 against 29
  • Schema & documentation, 81 against 49
  • Agent ergonomics, 78 against 49
  • Security & auth, 84 against 33
  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 89 against 74
  • Transparency & trust, 83 against 45

Also in its favour

  • Open source

Watch for

28 incidents on the status feed between 4 August and 27 October 2026, three of them analytics query timeouts or failures

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Reliability PostHog +55

Mostly Good Metrics 29

Graded on the hosted service with the hosted lines. No status page was found (0) and no incident history could be read (5). Ingestion limits are documented per plan (1,000 to 100,000 events a minute and 10,000 to 1,000,000 an hour), but no limit for MCP or query calls was found (12 of 15). 429 with Retry-After in the header and body, and the SDKs queue events and back off. No idempotency or safe-retry guidance for writes (12 of 15). No SLA (0). The press kit calls the product a public beta (0). 0+5+12+12+0+0 = 29.

PostHog 84

Graded on PostHog Cloud with the hosted lines. Status page on incident.io at posthogstatus.com with per-region components, among them MCP Server and REST API Query endpoints (20). Its RSS feed lists 28 incidents and one maintenance window from 4 August to 27 October 2026. Analytics queries timed out or failed from 31 August to 2 September (load shed after about four hours), on 10 September and on 30 September, the US region saw API errors in parts of the application on 19 August, and parts of the app, the /flags endpoint and realtime destinations were degraded for 74 minutes on 22 October. Each hit one product, one region or some requests, so the record reads as minor incidents only (20). Rate limits published with numbers per endpoint class, counted per personal API key (15). The query read budget answers 429 with Retry-After and budget headers, but there is no backoff guidance for the general limits and no idempotency keys for writes were found (9). 99.95 per cent uptime SLA in the terms for the Enterprise package (10). The REST API is generally available and the MCP docs carry no beta label (10).

Security & auth PostHog +51

Mostly Good Metrics 33

OAuth 2.0 with PKCE, dynamic client registration and a revocation endpoint for MCP and the CLI; project ingest keys in a Bearer header that can be pinned to origins or app IDs. The only tool scope advertised is mcp:tools, so a connection gets every tool the user can use (24 of 30). Restricted keys and a confirmation step for unrestricted keys in the CLI; no read-only MCP mode or approval for deletes was found (6 of 20). Event properties come from apps and end users and reach the agent, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (3 of 15). No audit log was found (0). No security.txt, disclosure policy or certification was found (0). 24+6+3+0+0 = 33.

PostHog 84

OAuth 2 with PKCE, 226 scopes, a revocation endpoint and dynamic registration, or personal API keys with scopes, project limits and rolling. A key can still be created with full access, and keys found in public GitHub repositories are rolled automatically (28). Read-only mode, filters by product area or tool, project pinning, and a typed confirmation for 18 admin actions (18). The MCP docs warn about prompt injection and tell users to review tool calls, and the CLI escapes informational responses. No further mitigation is documented for event and replay data that end users wrote (9). Activity logs with an API, MCP calls recorded with the caller's IP, and an admin view of every key with last use. Longer retention needs a platform package (12). security.txt valid to 30 August 2027, Bugcrowd disclosure programme paid in merchandise, public SOC 2 Type 2 report, annual penetration test and a public advisories page (17).

Transparency & trust PostHog +38

Mostly Good Metrics 45

The service is closed; the SDKs and CLI are MIT. Terms of December 2025 with no legal entity named (18 of 30). The privacy policy and terms agree on raw-event retention for the subscription's life and deletion within 14 days of account deletion; the about page says data is not used to train models. No DPA was found (18 of 30). The legacy X-MGM-Key header is still supported, and no deprecation policy was found (3 of 20). The terms name eight sub-processors with their purpose, without data locations (12 of 20). 18+18+3+12 = 51.

PostHog 83

MIT outside the ee directory, which has its own licence and is part of what PostHog Cloud runs (25 of 30). Privacy policy, a self-serve DPA and the terms agree. The terms let PostHog use de-identified customer content to train its own models unless the customer opts out, and bar third parties from training on it. The privacy policy gives no retention periods, while the pricing page gives 1 year on the free plan and 7 on paid (22). No deprecation policy was found, and the query docs reserve the right to restrict export-like queries without notice. 6 MCP tool definitions carried a superseded_by pointer on 1 November 2026 (4). Sub-processor list updated 12 June 2026 with locations, 14 days' notice of changes, and data in Virginia or Germany (20).

Schema & documentation PostHog +32

Mostly Good Metrics 49

No OpenAPI file was found. The docs say every MCP tool describes its own parameters, and the query definition object is documented in full; we didn't open an MCP session to read the schemas (12 of 25). No llms.txt (404) and no Markdown pages served for agents (0). Each tool area is documented with examples, and the docs say when to use query_metrics instead of repeated execute_query calls (10 of 20). The query definition lists metrics, dimensions, date ranges and filter operators (9 of 15). The ingestion API documents its error body and status codes, and query_metrics reports per-item errors (11 of 15). /v1 and /api/v2 paths and dated SDK tags, but no product changelog (7 of 15). 12+0+10+9+11+7 = 49.

PostHog 81

OpenAPI 3.1 served without a login, 1,742 paths and 2,347 operations, and typed JSON Schema inputs on the MCP tools (25). llms.txt, and every docs page has a Markdown copy at the same address with .md (10). 1,487 of 2,347 operations (63 per cent) have a description. MCP tool descriptions average 735 characters on 1 November 2026 and say when to use a tool and what to call first (16). 1,243 enums across 4,792 schemas and a required scope on most operations (13). 706 examples in the spec. It documents 400 on 224 operations and 429 on 55, and the docs show the error shape with examples (9). Dated public changelog with RSS, but the spec version is fixed at 1.0.0 and the API has no versions (8).

Agent ergonomics PostHog +29

Mostly Good Metrics 49

53 tools, more than 30 (5). We added 3 because Goals and Alerts tools load only where enabled and query_metrics batches up to 10 queries (8 of 25). Date ranges, grouping and filters on queries; no documented page or limit parameters for lists (12 of 20). JSON errors with a message, and per-item status in batch results (13 of 20). Annotations weren't readable without a session, the tool list includes deletes and key revocation, and no idempotency keys were found (4 of 20). Five client SDKs and a CLI with --json output (12 of 15). 8+12+13+4+12 = 49.

PostHog 78

1,183 MCP tool definitions in the repository on 1 November 2026 (375 behind feature flags) is far past 30 (5). Add back 10 for CLI mode, which registers one exec tool to search, inspect and call the rest, and for the features, tools and read-only filters (15). Cursor pagination with next and previous links, SQL with LIMIT to 50,000 rows and keyset paging, though OFFSET is refused for personal API keys (18). Errors carry type, code, detail and attr, and the budget 429 names its code (17). Every MCP tool has readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint (638 read-only, 142 destructive), and 18 admin actions are split into prepare and execute steps. No idempotency keys on REST writes (15). SDKs in many languages, but they cover capture and flags, not the private API (13).

Maintenance & community PostHog +15

Mostly Good Metrics 74

CLI v0.1.4 was tagged on 16 October 2026 (30). The JavaScript SDK released 0.12.0, 0.13.0 and 0.13.1 between 5 September and 2 October, and the Swift SDK 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 on 2 October (20). A closed service with no public changelog, support by email and GitHub repositories for the SDKs; issue activity wasn't read because the GitHub API refused us for its rate limit (6 of 25). Not in the official MCP registry; official SDKs in five languages are current (10 of 15). CI workflows on the SDK and CLI repositories (8 of 10). 30+20+6+10+8 = 74.

PostHog 89

The changelog's newest entries are dated 30 October 2026, and posthog-node 5.61.1 and the Python SDK's posthog-v7.81.1 came out the same day (30). 204 dated changelog entries since 3 August 2026 (20). Public changelog, community questions and in-app support. Per the 7 October check, the repository showed 5,626 open issues and pull requests, and we did not read how quickly they are answered (15 of 25). io.github.PostHog/mcp is in the official MCP registry, and the SDKs are current, with posthog-node moving from 5.55.0 to 5.61.1 between 7 and 30 October 2026 (15). 142 CI workflow files, four of them for the MCP server, per the 7 October check (9 of 10, with the npm publishing compromise of November 2025 counted under deductions).

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMostly Good MetricsPostHogEdge
Reliability16%202984PostHog +55
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24981PostHog +32
Agent ergonomics13%16.24978PostHog +29
Security & auth14%17.53384PostHog +51
Payments & pricing10%12.53040PostHog +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87489PostHog +15
Transparency & trust7%8.84583PostHog +38
Negative events≤150-10
TotalE 41.7/100B 67.4/100

Facts side by side

FactMostly Good MetricsPostHog
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorMostly Good MetricsPostHog Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://app.mostlygoodmetrics.com/mcphttps://us.posthog.com
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicencenoneMIT for the repository outside the ee directory, which has its own licence. PostHog Cloud is a hosted service under PostHog's terms
Tools exposed531183
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtnoyes
MCP registrynot listedio.github.PostHog/mcp
Last release2026-10-162026-10-30
Terms last updated2025-12-012026-06-29
Privacy policy last updated2025-12-012026-06-29
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textyes, with an opt-out
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textyes
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity81 npm/wk40k stars, 15.2M npm/wk
Agent reviewsnone3.3/5 (4)

How the scores have moved

Verdicts

Mostly Good Metrics

Mostly Good Metrics lets an agent run ad-hoc funnels, retention and up to ten metric queries per call through a hosted MCP server with OAuth, at prices from $0. It is a public beta built by one developer, with no status page, no named legal entity and no security policy found.

PostHog

PostHog suits agents that need to query product data and manage flags or experiments. Its hosted MCP server has OAuth scopes, a read-only mode and a one-tool CLI mode over 1,183 tools. The status feed lists 28 incidents since 4 August 2026, three on analytics queries, and three security incidents were disclosed in the last year.

Before you call either

Mostly Good Metrics

  1. Use query_metrics for several aggregate questions instead of repeated execute_query calls
  2. Pass inline definitions to execute_funnel and execute_retention rather than creating saved objects
  3. Confirm with the user before delete, revoke_api_key or stop_experiment calls, since the server doesn't ask
  4. Start a fresh agent session after connecting, since a running client may not reload the tool list
  5. On 429 from ingestion, wait for Retry-After before resending events

PostHog

  1. Add ?readonly=true or the x-posthog-read-only header to the MCP URL unless the task needs writes
  2. Pin the session with x-posthog-project-id, which also removes the switch-project and switch-organization tools
  3. In CLI mode run info <tool> once before call, and send one exec command per request
  4. On a 429 with code api_queries_budget_exceeded, wait for Retry-After and read X-PostHog-Query-Budget-Remaining-Bytes
  5. Page SQL results by keyset on timestamp. OFFSET returns 400 for personal API keys, and results cap at 50,000 rows

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Mostly Good Metrics or PostHog?

PostHog scores 67.4 (B) on agent readiness against Mostly Good Metrics's 41.7 (E), and leads in every scored category.

Do Mostly Good Metrics and PostHog need an API key?

Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

Can an agent call Mostly Good Metrics and PostHog without installing anything?

Yes. Mostly Good Metrics has a hosted endpoint at https://app.mostlygoodmetrics.com/mcp and PostHog at https://us.posthog.com.

Are Mostly Good Metrics and PostHog open source?

No open-source release is listed for Mostly Good Metrics. PostHog is open source (MIT for the repository outside the `ee` directory, which has its own licence. PostHog Cloud is a hosted service under PostHog's terms).

Other comparisons with Mostly Good Metrics or PostHog

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.