Head to head · Analytics queries · October 2026 research run
Mostly Good Metrics vs PostHog
PostHog scores 67.4 (B) on agent readiness against Mostly Good Metrics's 41.7 (E), and leads in every scored category. Both do analytics queries.
Best product analytics and experimentation tools for AI agents · All 153 product analytics comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Indie and small-team apps that want simple funnels and retention an agent can query.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where PostHog loses 10 points for them
Watch for
Public beta run by one developer, with no named legal entity in the terms
PostHog B
Best for An agent that answers product questions in SQL or with funnel, retention and trends queries, and that manages feature flags, experiments and error tracking in the same project.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 84 against 29
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 49
- Agent ergonomics, 78 against 49
- Security & auth, 84 against 33
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 89 against 74
- Transparency & trust, 83 against 45
Also in its favour
- Open source
Watch for
28 incidents on the status feed between 4 August and 27 October 2026, three of them analytics query timeouts or failures
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reliability PostHog +55
Mostly Good Metrics 29
Graded on the hosted service with the hosted lines. No status page was found (0) and no incident history could be read (5). Ingestion limits are documented per plan (1,000 to 100,000 events a minute and 10,000 to 1,000,000 an hour), but no limit for MCP or query calls was found (12 of 15). 429 with Retry-After in the header and body, and the SDKs queue events and back off. No idempotency or safe-retry guidance for writes (12 of 15). No SLA (0). The press kit calls the product a public beta (0). 0+5+12+12+0+0 = 29.
PostHog 84
Graded on PostHog Cloud with the hosted lines. Status page on incident.io at posthogstatus.com with per-region components, among them MCP Server and REST API Query endpoints (20). Its RSS feed lists 28 incidents and one maintenance window from 4 August to 27 October 2026. Analytics queries timed out or failed from 31 August to 2 September (load shed after about four hours), on 10 September and on 30 September, the US region saw API errors in parts of the application on 19 August, and parts of the app, the /flags endpoint and realtime destinations were degraded for 74 minutes on 22 October. Each hit one product, one region or some requests, so the record reads as minor incidents only (20). Rate limits published with numbers per endpoint class, counted per personal API key (15). The query read budget answers 429 with Retry-After and budget headers, but there is no backoff guidance for the general limits and no idempotency keys for writes were found (9). 99.95 per cent uptime SLA in the terms for the Enterprise package (10). The REST API is generally available and the MCP docs carry no beta label (10).
Security & auth PostHog +51
Mostly Good Metrics 33
OAuth 2.0 with PKCE, dynamic client registration and a revocation endpoint for MCP and the CLI; project ingest keys in a Bearer header that can be pinned to origins or app IDs. The only tool scope advertised is mcp:tools, so a connection gets every tool the user can use (24 of 30). Restricted keys and a confirmation step for unrestricted keys in the CLI; no read-only MCP mode or approval for deletes was found (6 of 20). Event properties come from apps and end users and reach the agent, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (3 of 15). No audit log was found (0). No security.txt, disclosure policy or certification was found (0). 24+6+3+0+0 = 33.
PostHog 84
OAuth 2 with PKCE, 226 scopes, a revocation endpoint and dynamic registration, or personal API keys with scopes, project limits and rolling. A key can still be created with full access, and keys found in public GitHub repositories are rolled automatically (28). Read-only mode, filters by product area or tool, project pinning, and a typed confirmation for 18 admin actions (18). The MCP docs warn about prompt injection and tell users to review tool calls, and the CLI escapes informational responses. No further mitigation is documented for event and replay data that end users wrote (9). Activity logs with an API, MCP calls recorded with the caller's IP, and an admin view of every key with last use. Longer retention needs a platform package (12). security.txt valid to 30 August 2027, Bugcrowd disclosure programme paid in merchandise, public SOC 2 Type 2 report, annual penetration test and a public advisories page (17).
Transparency & trust PostHog +38
Mostly Good Metrics 45
The service is closed; the SDKs and CLI are MIT. Terms of December 2025 with no legal entity named (18 of 30). The privacy policy and terms agree on raw-event retention for the subscription's life and deletion within 14 days of account deletion; the about page says data is not used to train models. No DPA was found (18 of 30). The legacy X-MGM-Key header is still supported, and no deprecation policy was found (3 of 20). The terms name eight sub-processors with their purpose, without data locations (12 of 20). 18+18+3+12 = 51.
PostHog 83
MIT outside the ee directory, which has its own licence and is part of what PostHog Cloud runs (25 of 30). Privacy policy, a self-serve DPA and the terms agree. The terms let PostHog use de-identified customer content to train its own models unless the customer opts out, and bar third parties from training on it. The privacy policy gives no retention periods, while the pricing page gives 1 year on the free plan and 7 on paid (22). No deprecation policy was found, and the query docs reserve the right to restrict export-like queries without notice. 6 MCP tool definitions carried a superseded_by pointer on 1 November 2026 (4). Sub-processor list updated 12 June 2026 with locations, 14 days' notice of changes, and data in Virginia or Germany (20).
Schema & documentation PostHog +32
Mostly Good Metrics 49
No OpenAPI file was found. The docs say every MCP tool describes its own parameters, and the query definition object is documented in full; we didn't open an MCP session to read the schemas (12 of 25). No llms.txt (404) and no Markdown pages served for agents (0). Each tool area is documented with examples, and the docs say when to use query_metrics instead of repeated execute_query calls (10 of 20). The query definition lists metrics, dimensions, date ranges and filter operators (9 of 15). The ingestion API documents its error body and status codes, and query_metrics reports per-item errors (11 of 15). /v1 and /api/v2 paths and dated SDK tags, but no product changelog (7 of 15). 12+0+10+9+11+7 = 49.
PostHog 81
OpenAPI 3.1 served without a login, 1,742 paths and 2,347 operations, and typed JSON Schema inputs on the MCP tools (25). llms.txt, and every docs page has a Markdown copy at the same address with .md (10). 1,487 of 2,347 operations (63 per cent) have a description. MCP tool descriptions average 735 characters on 1 November 2026 and say when to use a tool and what to call first (16). 1,243 enums across 4,792 schemas and a required scope on most operations (13). 706 examples in the spec. It documents 400 on 224 operations and 429 on 55, and the docs show the error shape with examples (9). Dated public changelog with RSS, but the spec version is fixed at 1.0.0 and the API has no versions (8).
Agent ergonomics PostHog +29
Mostly Good Metrics 49
53 tools, more than 30 (5). We added 3 because Goals and Alerts tools load only where enabled and query_metrics batches up to 10 queries (8 of 25). Date ranges, grouping and filters on queries; no documented page or limit parameters for lists (12 of 20). JSON errors with a message, and per-item status in batch results (13 of 20). Annotations weren't readable without a session, the tool list includes deletes and key revocation, and no idempotency keys were found (4 of 20). Five client SDKs and a CLI with --json output (12 of 15). 8+12+13+4+12 = 49.
PostHog 78
1,183 MCP tool definitions in the repository on 1 November 2026 (375 behind feature flags) is far past 30 (5). Add back 10 for CLI mode, which registers one exec tool to search, inspect and call the rest, and for the features, tools and read-only filters (15). Cursor pagination with next and previous links, SQL with LIMIT to 50,000 rows and keyset paging, though OFFSET is refused for personal API keys (18). Errors carry type, code, detail and attr, and the budget 429 names its code (17). Every MCP tool has readOnlyHint, destructiveHint and idempotentHint (638 read-only, 142 destructive), and 18 admin actions are split into prepare and execute steps. No idempotency keys on REST writes (15). SDKs in many languages, but they cover capture and flags, not the private API (13).
Maintenance & community PostHog +15
Mostly Good Metrics 74
CLI v0.1.4 was tagged on 16 October 2026 (30). The JavaScript SDK released 0.12.0, 0.13.0 and 0.13.1 between 5 September and 2 October, and the Swift SDK 1.0.0 and 1.0.1 on 2 October (20). A closed service with no public changelog, support by email and GitHub repositories for the SDKs; issue activity wasn't read because the GitHub API refused us for its rate limit (6 of 25). Not in the official MCP registry; official SDKs in five languages are current (10 of 15). CI workflows on the SDK and CLI repositories (8 of 10). 30+20+6+10+8 = 74.
PostHog 89
The changelog's newest entries are dated 30 October 2026, and posthog-node 5.61.1 and the Python SDK's posthog-v7.81.1 came out the same day (30). 204 dated changelog entries since 3 August 2026 (20). Public changelog, community questions and in-app support. Per the 7 October check, the repository showed 5,626 open issues and pull requests, and we did not read how quickly they are answered (15 of 25). io.github.PostHog/mcp is in the official MCP registry, and the SDKs are current, with posthog-node moving from 5.55.0 to 5.61.1 between 7 and 30 October 2026 (15). 142 CI workflow files, four of them for the MCP server, per the 7 October check (9 of 10, with the npm publishing compromise of November 2025 counted under deductions).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Mostly Good Metrics | PostHog | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 29 | 84 | PostHog +55 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 49 | 81 | PostHog +32 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 49 | 78 | PostHog +29 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 33 | 84 | PostHog +51 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 40 | PostHog +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 74 | 89 | PostHog +15 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 45 | 83 | PostHog +38 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -10 | |
| Total | E 41.7/100 | B 67.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Mostly Good Metrics | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Mostly Good Metrics | PostHog Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://app.mostlygoodmetrics.com/mcp | https://us.posthog.com |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | MIT for the repository outside the ee directory, which has its own licence. PostHog Cloud is a hosted service under PostHog's terms |
| Tools exposed | 53 | 1183 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | io.github.PostHog/mcp |
| Last release | 2026-10-16 | 2026-10-30 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-12-01 | 2026-06-29 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-12-01 | 2026-06-29 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 81 npm/wk | 40k stars, 15.2M npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Mostly Good Metrics
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Mostly Good Metrics
Mostly Good Metrics lets an agent run ad-hoc funnels, retention and up to ten metric queries per call through a hosted MCP server with OAuth, at prices from $0. It is a public beta built by one developer, with no status page, no named legal entity and no security policy found.
PostHog
PostHog suits agents that need to query product data and manage flags or experiments. Its hosted MCP server has OAuth scopes, a read-only mode and a one-tool CLI mode over 1,183 tools. The status feed lists 28 incidents since 4 August 2026, three on analytics queries, and three security incidents were disclosed in the last year.
Before you call either
Mostly Good Metrics
- Use query_metrics for several aggregate questions instead of repeated execute_query calls
- Pass inline definitions to execute_funnel and execute_retention rather than creating saved objects
- Confirm with the user before delete, revoke_api_key or stop_experiment calls, since the server doesn't ask
- Start a fresh agent session after connecting, since a running client may not reload the tool list
- On 429 from ingestion, wait for Retry-After before resending events
PostHog
- Add
?readonly=trueor thex-posthog-read-onlyheader to the MCP URL unless the task needs writes - Pin the session with
x-posthog-project-id, which also removes theswitch-projectandswitch-organizationtools - In CLI mode run
info <tool>once beforecall, and send oneexeccommand per request - On a 429 with code
api_queries_budget_exceeded, wait forRetry-Afterand readX-PostHog-Query-Budget-Remaining-Bytes - Page SQL results by keyset on
timestamp.OFFSETreturns 400 for personal API keys, and results cap at 50,000 rows
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Mostly Good Metrics or PostHog?
PostHog scores 67.4 (B) on agent readiness against Mostly Good Metrics's 41.7 (E), and leads in every scored category.
Do Mostly Good Metrics and PostHog need an API key?
Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Mostly Good Metrics and PostHog without installing anything?
Yes. Mostly Good Metrics has a hosted endpoint at https://app.mostlygoodmetrics.com/mcp and PostHog at https://us.posthog.com.
Are Mostly Good Metrics and PostHog open source?
No open-source release is listed for Mostly Good Metrics. PostHog is open source (MIT for the repository outside the `ee` directory, which has its own licence. PostHog Cloud is a hosted service under PostHog's terms).
Other comparisons with Mostly Good Metrics or PostHog
- Amplitude vs Mostly Good Metrics
- Amplitude vs PostHog
- Basedash MCP vs Mostly Good Metrics
- Basedash MCP vs PostHog
- Countly vs Mostly Good Metrics
- Countly vs PostHog
- Fullstory vs Mostly Good Metrics
- Fullstory vs PostHog
- Matomo vs Mostly Good Metrics
- Matomo vs PostHog
- Mixpanel vs Mostly Good Metrics
- Mixpanel vs PostHog
- Mostly Good Metrics vs OpenPanel
- Mostly Good Metrics vs Optimizely Experimentation
- Mostly Good Metrics vs Pendo
- Mostly Good Metrics vs Statsig
- Mostly Good Metrics vs Userpilot
- Mostly Good Metrics vs Woopra
- OpenPanel vs PostHog
- Pendo vs PostHog
- PostHog vs Statsig
- PostHog vs Userpilot
- PostHog vs Woopra
- Flagsmith vs PostHog
- Harness Feature Management & Experimentation vs PostHog
- LaunchDarkly vs PostHog
- Heap vs Mostly Good Metrics
- Heap vs PostHog
- Flagsmith vs Mostly Good Metrics
- GrowthBook vs Mostly Good Metrics
- GrowthBook vs PostHog
- Harness Feature Management & Experimentation vs Mostly Good Metrics
- LaunchDarkly vs Mostly Good Metrics
- Optimizely Experimentation vs PostHog
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/mostly-good-metrics-vs-posthog.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/mostly-good-metrics.json·/api/v1/tools/posthog.json - From a terminal
anchor compare mostly-good-metrics posthog(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "mostly-good-metrics", "b": "posthog"}at/mcp, no key