Head to head · Design files · October 2026 research run
Miro API + MCP vs pen.dev
Miro API + MCP scores 65 (B) on agent readiness against pen.dev's 47.6 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. pen.dev leads on payments & pricing. Both do design files.
Which one, for what
Good for Agents that draw diagrams, maps and planning boards people will keep editing.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 73 against 33
- Schema & documentation, 85 against 61
- Security & auth, 70 against 33
- Maintenance & community, 77 against 59
- Transparency & trust, 76 against 53
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Legacy MCP board tools were removed nine days after the deprecation notice
pen.dev D
Good for A coding agent that designs screens beside the code and keeps them in Git, including in CI.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 38 against 30
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- No incidents deducted, where Miro API + MCP loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No changelog. The three desktop releases on GitHub have empty notes, and the format docs reserve the right to make breaking changes
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Miro API + MCP | pen.dev | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 73 | 33 | Miro API + MCP +40 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 61 | Miro API + MCP +24 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 63 | 66 | pen.dev +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 70 | 33 | Miro API + MCP +37 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 38 | pen.dev +8 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 77 | 59 | Miro API + MCP +18 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 76 | 53 | Miro API + MCP +23 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | 0 | |
| Total | 65 · B | 47.6 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Miro API + MCP | pen.dev |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | MCP server |
| Vendor | Miro | High Agency, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.miro.com/v2 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | stdio |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | proprietary | Proprietary. The CLI package on npm carries a proprietary licence file, and the apps fall under the vendor's EULA |
| Tools exposed | 18 | 6 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | io.github.miroapp/mcp-server | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-10-08 |
| Terms last updated | 2021-09-01 | 2026-10-06 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-08-01 | 2026-10-06 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 156 stars, 19k npm/wk | 3.5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Miro API + MCP
REST creates shapes, connectors and frames, so flowcharts and architecture sketches can be drawn directly. Legacy MCP board tools were removed nine days after the deprecation notice.
pen.dev
An agent can create, edit and export .pen designs without a GUI through the pen CLI, with four compact MCP tools that carry annotations and a documented JSON format. The software is closed and needs a pen.dev account. No changelog, status page or security contact was found, and 14 public issue reports had no reply on 8 October 2026.
Before you call either
Miro API + MCP
- Create shapes first, then connectors with
startItemandendItemids - Put related items in a frame and set
parentso they move together - Watch
X-RateLimit-Remaining. There's noRetry-After, so back off exponentially on 429 - Through MCP, call
canvas_read_as_svgbeforecanvas_update_from_svgso the model sees the current layout - Don't call the legacy MCP board tools. They were removed on 17 September 2026
pen.dev
- Call
read_skill(), thenread_skill({ path: "pen-schema.md" })andread_skill({ path: "execute.md" })before the firstexecute. The tool description alone doesn't document the operations - Call
get_app_state()and confirm the active document before editing. The MCP server works on whichever.penfile is open in the app - In headless
pen interactive, callsave()beforeexit(), and keep--inand--outon different paths to preserve the source - Check that an export file exists. The docs say an export failure can print an error without a nonzero exit status
- In CI set
PEN_CLI_KEYplus a provider key such asANTHROPIC_API_KEY. Runpen version, sincepen --versionis not a flag
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Miro API + MCP or pen.dev?
Miro API + MCP scores 65 (B) on agent readiness against pen.dev's 47.6 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. pen.dev leads on payments & pricing.
Do Miro API + MCP and pen.dev need an API key?
Miro API + MCP uses an OAuth sign-in. pen.dev takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Miro API + MCP and pen.dev without installing anything?
Miro API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://api.miro.com/v2. pen.dev runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed.
Other comparisons with Miro API + MCP or pen.dev
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/miro-vs-pen-dev.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/miro.json·/api/v1/tools/pen-dev.json - From a terminal
anchor compare miro pen-dev(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "miro", "b": "pen-dev"}at/mcp, no key