Head to head · Backlink data · October 2026 research run
Majestic API vs SE Ranking API + MCP
SE Ranking API + MCP scores 50.9 (D) on agent readiness against Majestic API's 33.4 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Majestic API leads on security & auth. Both do backlink data.
Best SEO and search visibility data for AI agents · All 45 seo comparisons
Which one, for what
Good for An agent that needs backlink, referring domain, anchor text and Trust Flow data in volume for an owner who already pays for the API plan.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 32 against 21
Watch for
Clause 14.1(f) of the supply terms forbids querying Majestic's database or servers with automated tools without prior permission. This matters before any probe is run
Good for An agent that needs keyword, backlink, domain and AI search visibility data at a published price per call, or that manages rank tracking projects for an SE Ranking customer.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 51 against 17
- Schema & documentation, 58 against 44
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 15
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 22
- Transparency & trust, 71 against 53
Watch for
No scoped or read-only keys. The MCP docs say a key has the same access as the account, including Project API deletes
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Majestic API | SE Ranking API + MCP | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 17 | 51 | SE Ranking API + MCP +34 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 44 | 58 | SE Ranking API + MCP +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 54 | 58 | SE Ranking API + MCP +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 32 | 21 | Majestic API +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 15 | 40 | SE Ranking API + MCP +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 22 | 79 | SE Ranking API + MCP +57 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 53 | 71 | SE Ranking API + MCP +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 33.4 · F | 50.9 · D |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Majestic API | SE Ranking API + MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Majestic (Majestic-12 Limited) | SE Ranking (SER Acquisition Inc.) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.majestic.com | https://api.seranking.com |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Pay per use |
| Price for backlink data | not published | $0.0002 per record |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Majestic's Terms and Conditions. The Python 3 connector on GitHub carries a BSD-style licence file | Proprietary service under the SE Ranking API Terms of Service. The OpenAPI file and the Claude skills on GitHub are MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | com.seranking/mcp |
| Last release | none | 2026-09-28 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-04-01 | 2026-06-25 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 3 stars | 0 stars |
Verdicts
Majestic API
Each command's cost in units is published and a sandbox endpoint returns sample data without spending allowance. API access starts at $399.99 a month with no trial, and no OpenAPI file, status page, numeric rate limit, SLA or API changelog was found. The supply terms require permission before querying with automated tools.
SE Ranking API + MCP
Every Data API endpoint has a published credit cost, credits sell from $50 for 250,000 with no expiry, and a 14-day trial needs no card. Keys carry full account access with no scopes or read-only mode, the key may travel in the URL, and no security page, SLA or llms.txt was found.
Before you call either
Majestic API
- Send requests by HTTPS POST with
app_api_keyin the body. The docs show GET URLs for demonstration only and plain HTTP still works - Always set
datasource=freshordatasource=historic. Without it the Historic Index is used when the plan includes it - Call
GetSubscriptionInfo(no cost) before a large pull.GetBackLinkDataspends 5,000 analysis units a call plus one retrieval unit a row - Read columns by header name, not position. The docs say column order can change between requests and Majestic may vary rows and columns at any time
- Develop against
https://developer.majestic.com/api/json, which costs no units, then switch the host toapi.majestic.com - Ask the owner to confirm Majestic's permission for automated querying first. Clause 14.1(f) of the terms requires it
SE Ranking API + MCP
- Send the key as
Authorization: Token <key>, notBearerand not?apikey=, so it stays out of URLs and logs - Call
GET /v1/account/subscription(0 credits) and readunits_leftbefore a large pull. A short balance returnsInsufficient funds - Set
limitandcolson per-record endpoints. Backlink summaries cost 100 credits a target and keyword rows 10 credits each - Stay under 10 requests a second on the Data API and 5 on the Project API per key. Repeated overruns block the Project API for 10 minutes
- Ask the owner before any Project API or
PROJECT_*create, update or delete call. The key has no read-only mode and nothing confirms a delete
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Majestic API or SE Ranking API + MCP?
SE Ranking API + MCP scores 50.9 (D) on agent readiness against Majestic API's 33.4 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Majestic API leads on security & auth.
Do Majestic API and SE Ranking API + MCP need an API key?
Majestic API needs an API key. SE Ranking API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Majestic API and SE Ranking API + MCP without installing anything?
Yes. Majestic API has a hosted endpoint at https://api.majestic.com and SE Ranking API + MCP at https://api.seranking.com.
Other comparisons with Majestic API or SE Ranking API + MCP
- Ahrefs vs Majestic API
- Ahrefs vs SE Ranking API + MCP
- DataForSEO vs Majestic API
- DataForSEO vs SE Ranking API + MCP
- Google Search Console API vs Majestic API
- Keywords Everywhere API + MCP vs Majestic API
- Keywords Everywhere API + MCP vs SE Ranking API + MCP
- Majestic API vs Similarweb
- Manifold vs SE Ranking API + MCP
- Moz API vs SE Ranking API + MCP
- SE Ranking API + MCP vs Semrush API + MCP
- SE Ranking API + MCP vs Similarweb
- Google Search Console API vs SE Ranking API + MCP
- Majestic API vs Manifold
- Majestic API vs Moz API
- Majestic API vs Semrush API + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/majestic-vs-se-ranking.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/majestic.json·/api/v1/tools/se-ranking.json - From a terminal
anchor compare majestic se-ranking(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "majestic", "b": "se-ranking"}at/mcp, no key