Head to head · Email send · October 2026 research run

Loops API + MCP vs Mailjet API + MCP

Loops API + MCP has a score of 63.1 (B) against Mailjet API + MCP's 59.5 (C). Both do email send. The largest gap is reliability, 28 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Loops API + MCP for

  • reliability (+28)
  • schema & documentation (+6)
  • agent ergonomics (+13)

Pick Mailjet API + MCP for

  • security & auth (+12)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLoops API + MCPMailjet API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%209062Loops API + MCP +28
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28276Loops API + MCP +6
Agent ergonomics13%16.26653Loops API + MCP +13
Security & auth14%17.54052Mailjet API + MCP +12
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88379Loops API + MCP +4
Transparency & trust7%8.86973Mailjet API + MCP +4
Negative events≤15-30
Total63.1 · B59.5 · C

Facts side by side

FactLoops API + MCPMailjet API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorLoops (Astrodon Corporation)Mailjet (Sinch)
Hosted endpointhttps://app.loops.so/api/v1https://api.mailjet.com/v3.1
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTPHTTP, stdio
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMITMIT
Tools exposednone117
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registryio.github.loops-so/loopsnot listed
Last release2026-09-032026-09-14
Popularity7 stars, 460k npm/wk255 stars, 177k npm/wk, 245k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3.5/5 (2)2.5/5 (2)

Verdicts

Loops API + MCP

No status incidents in the last 90 days. No scoped or read-only keys, and no read-only MCP mode.

Mailjet API + MCP

SandboxMode on Send API v3.1 validates a payload without delivering it. The MCP server registers 117 GET-only tools and can't send.

Before you call either

Loops API + MCP

  1. Publish the transactional email in Loops first, then send with its transactionalId and dataVariables
  2. Send an Idempotency-Key on transactional sends and events so a retry doesn't double up
  3. On 429, back off exponentially and read x-ratelimit-remaining
  4. Ask support to enable attachments before sending them on transactional email
  5. Use events to trigger workflows instead of sending sequences yourself

Mailjet API + MCP

  1. Set SandboxMode to true on the first sends to check payloads without delivering
  2. Send with POST /v3.1/send and a Messages array, many messages per call
  3. Use the MCP for statistics and contact lookups only, since it can't send
  4. Pass MAILJET_API_KEY as key:secret. The server checks it at startup and exits if it's wrong
  5. On 429, wait and retry. Non-transactional endpoints have much lower limits than send

Other comparisons with Loops API + MCP or Mailjet API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.