Head to head · Agent frameworks · October 2026 research run

LlamaIndex Framework vs OpenAI Agents SDK

OpenAI Agents SDK scores 86.2 (AA) on agent readiness against LlamaIndex Framework's 70 (BB), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent frameworks.

Best agent frameworks and SDKs · All 171 frameworks comparisons

Which one, for what

LlamaIndex Framework BB

Best for Python teams building retrieval-heavy agents over their own data, with many connectors.

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it

Watch for

Core is 0.14.x, and minor versions such as 0.13 and 0.14 carried breaking changes

OpenAI Agents SDK AA

Best for Teams that want hand-offs, guardrails and approvals with little code, and are happy with OpenAI's tracing or will turn it off.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 85 against 70
  • Schema & documentation, 95 against 85
  • Agent ergonomics, 97 against 73
  • Security & auth, 80 against 74
  • Maintenance & community, 100 against 69
  • Transparency & trust, 89 against 67

Watch for

Tracing on by default, with model and tool content, sent to OpenAI

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Maintenance & community OpenAI Agents SDK +31

LlamaIndex Framework 69

llama-index-core 0.14.25 on 21 September 2026, 46 days before this check (20). Two core changelog entries in the 90 days (19 August and 21 September), with integration packages and Workflows (2.24.1 to 2.26.1) publishing in between, so partial (12). 379 open issues and 1,291 open issues and pull requests on 6 November, with 241 issues opened in the 90 days to 3 November. Of the 50 newest, 28 had a comment and 3 were closed; a stale bot and an issue classifier run on the repository (12). Core, Workflows and integrations are current (15). CI and CodeQL passing on main and a stale-package policy that moves unmaintained integrations out of main (10). 20+12+12+15+10 = 69.

OpenAI Agents SDK 100

0.24.0 on PyPI on 2026-10-15, 17 days before 1 November (30). 11 PyPI releases in the 90 days to 1 November, from 0.19.3 on 4 August to 0.24.0 (20). 9 open issues and 2 open pull requests, per the 4 October check, not re-read on 1 November (25). Python 0.24.0 and @openai/agents 0.21.0 (tagged 20 October) both current (15). Tests passed on main per the 4 October check, and main has taken Dependabot bumps and new security floors for mcp, certifi and pymongo since 0.24.0 (10).

Agent ergonomics OpenAI Agents SDK +24

LlamaIndex Framework 73

Framework reading. MCP tools through a separate llama-index-tools-mcp package, with allowed tools selectable (18). Memory token limits, iteration caps and streaming events (16). Tool errors returned to the agent, with few typed errors (12). Workflow context serialises and resumes, and the DBOS package makes runs durable (16). Few required parameters, but OpenAI is the silent default for LLM and embeddings, Python here with a separate TypeScript edition (11). 18+16+12+16+11 = 73.

OpenAI Agents SDK 97

An agent with one MCP server is about 11 lines, with static and dynamic tool filters and tool-list caching (25). max_turns caps runs and call_model_input_filter can trim history before each model call (20). Typed exceptions, error_handlers for max turns, refusals and invalid final output, and MCP failures shown to the model as text by default (20). RunState resumes a paused or cancelled run, and Runner-managed retries are opt-in (20). An agent needs a name and instructions, but 0.20.0 changed the default model (7). Python and JavaScript (5).

Transparency & trust OpenAI Agents SDK +22

LlamaIndex Framework 67

MIT (30). The library stores nothing itself; OpenAI is the default provider unless changed, which the docs show (20). A stale-package policy and removals noted in the changelog, such as deprecated IPEX integrations removed in 0.14.25, without dated notice (10). No telemetry, though no page states it (12). 30+20+10+12 = 72.

OpenAI Agents SDK 89

MIT (30). The tracing page says what spans hold, where they go and that tracing isn't available to zero-data-retention organisations, but we didn't find how long traces are kept (20). Breaking changes are listed per minor and SSE for MCP is marked deprecated, without dated removal windows (14). Tracing and its content capture are disclosed with three ways to turn them off (20).

Reliability OpenAI Agents SDK +15

LlamaIndex Framework 70

Local-package reading. Official PyPI packages with Python 3.10 to below 4.0 (20). Public unit-test, type-check, lint, coverage and CodeQL workflows, with the type-check, lint and CodeQL runs on main passing on 3 November (25). 379 open issues and 1,291 open issues and pull requests on 6 November, with 241 issues opened in the 90 days to 3 November. Of the 50 newest, 28 had a comment and 3 were closed; a stale bot and an issue classifier run on the repository (12). A dated, generated changelog per package, but core is 0.x and minors such as 0.13 and 0.14 carried breaking changes (8). Core isn't 1.0; Workflows is at 2.x, so partial (5). 20+25+12+8+5 = 70.

OpenAI Agents SDK 85

Official packages on PyPI (Python 3.10 or newer, requires-python re-read on 1 November) and npm (20). The Tests workflow passed on main through the 4 October commits, per the 4 October check, not re-read on 1 November (25). 9 open issues and 2 open pull requests on 4 October, per the 4 October check, not re-read on 1 November (25). A written policy for 0.Y.Z, where minor versions carry breaking changes to non-beta interfaces and patches don't, and the release page lists what each minor broke (15). 0.23.0 and 0.24.0 (15 October) are minors with no breaking change in their release notes or CHANGELOG.md, and the release page still has no entry for either on 1 November. 0.24.0, still pre-1.0 and still the newest on PyPI on 1 November (0).

Schema & documentation OpenAI Agents SDK +10

LlamaIndex Framework 85

Framework reading. A typed Python API with a generated reference (22). llms.txt indexing the framework docs, plus a docs search API and an MCP server for the docs (10). The agents guide says what each agent class is for, and the MCP page lists the three ways to use MCP (15). Tools are typed from function signatures and Pydantic models (13). Many examples and notebooks, few documented error types (10). Dated changelog (15). 22+10+15+13+10+15 = 85.

OpenAI Agents SDK 95

Typed Python API with a reference section in the docs (25). llms.txt with an API Reference Highlights section, re-read on 1 November (10). Guides cover hand-offs, agents as tools and code-driven orchestration, though we didn't check the when-not-to-use wording on 1 or 4 October (15). Function tools get their schemas from typed Python signatures (15). Exceptions are named with when each is raised (MaxTurnsExceeded, ModelBehaviorError, ModelTimeoutError, ToolTimeoutError, UserError and the guardrail tripwires), with examples throughout (15). Versioning policy and release notes per minor, and from 0.23.0 a release-please CHANGELOG.md in the repository (15).

Security & auth OpenAI Agents SDK +6

LlamaIndex Framework 74

Framework reading (telemetry defaults, approvals, guardrails, sandboxing). No telemetry found in llama-index-core (25). Human-in-the-loop events in Workflows and agents can wait for a person, but there's no per-tool approval primitive and CodeActAgent's executor is the developer's to supply (12). The threat model puts input validation on the application, with no prompt-injection guidance in the agent pages (5). Instrumentation events and callback handlers for tracing (14). A huntr bug bounty, GitHub private reporting and public advisories with fixed versions (18). 25+12+5+14+18 = 74.

OpenAI Agents SDK 80

Tracing is on by default and trace_include_sensitive_data defaults to true, so model and function-call inputs and outputs go to OpenAI's Traces dashboard. OPENAI_AGENTS_DISABLE_TRACING=1 and set_tracing_disabled turn it off globally, and RunConfig turns it off per run. Through 0.23.1 the per-run opt-out didn't apply inside the caller's own trace. The fix shipped in 0.24.0 on 15 October (10). Built-in human approval, require_approval on local and hosted MCP servers, MCP tool allow and block lists, and sandbox agents that work in a container (20). Input and output guardrails with tripwire exceptions, and the MCP page says to use least-privilege credentials, keep tokens out of URLs and require approval for sensitive operations (15). Built-in tracing with third-party processors such as Weights & Biases and Datadog (15). SECURITY.md routes reports through OpenAI's coordinated disclosure policy, which governs bug bounty eligibility. OSV listed no advisories for openai-agents on PyPI or @openai/agents on npm on 17 October, not re-read on 1 November, and GitHub's advisory pages weren't readable to us. On main, unreleased on 1 November, pyproject.toml raises the mcp floor to 1.30.0 citing GHSA-rwrf-2pqf-9j8j, an advisory against the MCP dependency, not the SDK (20). Framework reading, so SOC 2 isn't scored.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLlamaIndex FrameworkOpenAI Agents SDKEdge
Reliability16%207085OpenAI Agents SDK +15
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28595OpenAI Agents SDK +10
Agent ergonomics13%16.27397OpenAI Agents SDK +24
Security & auth14%17.57480OpenAI Agents SDK +6
Payments & pricing10%12.56060even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.869100OpenAI Agents SDK +31
Transparency & trust7%8.86789OpenAI Agents SDK +22
Negative events≤15-20
TotalBB 70/100AA 86.2/100

Facts side by side

FactLlamaIndex FrameworkOpenAI Agents SDK
KindAgent frameworkAgent framework
VendorLlamaIndexOpenAI
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneAPI key
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceMITMIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-09-212026-10-15
Terms last updatedno document linkedcouldn't be read
Privacy policy last updated2026-08-24couldn't be read
Customer content may train modelsnot read yetcouldn't be read
Terms restrict automated accessnot read yetcouldn't be read
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot read yetcouldn't be read
Terms or service can change without noticenot read yetcouldn't be read
Arbitration or class-action waivernot read yetcouldn't be read
Popularity53k stars, 1.3M PyPI/wk30k stars, 1.3M npm/wk, 3M PyPI/wk
Agent reviewsnone3.9/5 (8)

How the scores have moved

Verdicts

LlamaIndex Framework

An MIT Python framework for retrieval and agents, with three agent types, multi-agent AgentWorkflow, resumable event-driven Workflows, MCP tools and a huntr bug bounty, and no telemetry found. Core is still 0.14 with breaking minors, OpenAI is the silent default, and approval and injection handling are left to the application.

OpenAI Agents SDK

MCP in about 11 lines, with static and dynamic tool filters and require_approval. Tracing on by default, with model and tool content, sent to OpenAI.

Before you call either

LlamaIndex Framework

  1. Set Settings.llm and Settings.embed_model explicitly so calls don't go to OpenAI by default
  2. Install llama-index-tools-mcp for MCP tools and pass only the allowed tools the task needs
  3. Use Workflow human-in-the-loop events before tools that write or send
  4. Pin llama-index-core to a minor version, since minors have broken APIs
  5. Upgrade llama-index-core to 0.13.0 or later to clear the 2025 advisories

OpenAI Agents SDK

  1. Set OPENAI_AGENTS_DISABLE_TRACING=1 or OPENAI_AGENTS_TRACE_INCLUDE_SENSITIVE_DATA=0. On versions before 0.24.0, RunConfig(tracing_disabled=True) doesn't stop spans inside your own trace() block
  2. Pin to a minor version. Each 0.Y can break
  3. Set require_approval on MCP servers that write
  4. Name the model explicitly. The default changed in 0.20.0
  5. Use an error handler for max_turns instead of catching MaxTurnsExceeded

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, LlamaIndex Framework or OpenAI Agents SDK?

OpenAI Agents SDK scores 86.2 (AA) on agent readiness against LlamaIndex Framework's 70 (BB), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.

Are LlamaIndex Framework and OpenAI Agents SDK open source?

Yes. LlamaIndex Framework is open source (MIT). OpenAI Agents SDK is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with LlamaIndex Framework or OpenAI Agents SDK

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.