Get an audit

Head to head · Translate text · October 2026 research run

Lara Translate API vs Lingo.dev

Lingo.dev scores 62.3 (B) on agent readiness against Lara Translate API's 61.3 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Lara Translate API leads on schema & documentation and payments & pricing. Both do translate text.

Lara Translate APITranslated · HTTP API C61.3/100#365 of 722 Lingo.devReplexica, Inc. · HTTP API B62.3/100#341 of 722

Which one, for what

Lara Translate API C

Good for Agents that localise for one brand and need glossaries, translation memories and style instructions on every call, especially from an MCP client.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 74 against 54
  • Payments & pricing, 40 against 20

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine
  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

Texts may be used for model improvement unless a request sets noTrace

Lingo.dev B

Good for Product teams that translate interface strings and content into many locales and want glossary, tone and rule control held in one place, driven from code, CI or a coding assistant.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 62 against 30
  • Transparency & trust, 71 against 60

Watch for

No public OpenAPI file was found, llms.txt holds one title line and docs pages have no Markdown version

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLara Translate APILingo.devEdge
Reliability16%207071Lingo.dev +1
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27454Lara Translate API +20
Agent ergonomics13%16.27775Lara Translate API +2
Security & auth14%17.53062Lingo.dev +32
Payments & pricing10%12.54020Lara Translate API +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88387Lingo.dev +4
Transparency & trust7%8.86071Lingo.dev +11
Negative events≤1500
Total61.3 · C62.3 · B

Facts side by side

FactLara Translate APILingo.dev
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorTranslatedReplexica, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp-v2.laratranslate.com/v1https://mcp.lingo.dev/account
TransportsHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdioHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumPay per use
x402nono
LicenceMIT (MCP server and SDKs)Proprietary hosted service under Lingo.dev's terms of service. The lingodotdev/lingo.dev repository (legacy CLI, JavaScript SDK, compiler) and the Python SDK are Apache-2.0. The @lingo.dev/cli package states no licence on npm
Tools exposed22none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registrynot listeddev.lingo/main
Last release2026-09-242026-10-07
Terms last updatedno date given2026-05-07
Privacy policy last updatedno date given2026-05-07
Customer content may train modelsyes, with an opt-outnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyesyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity97 stars, 29k npm/wk, 1.7k PyPI/wk5.4k stars, 92k npm/wk, 2k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)none

Verdicts

Lara Translate API

Glossaries, translation memories, styles and instructions on every translate call. Texts may be used for model improvement unless a request sets noTrace.

Lingo.dev

Lingo.dev suits teams that want glossary and tone control on every translation call, with a published fee of $2 per million output tokens and model costs passed through. It has no public OpenAPI file, its llms.txt is one line, and scoped keys, roles and audit logs are limited to the Enterprise plan.

Before you call either

Lara Translate API

  1. Set noTrace on every request that carries private text, since storage for model improvement is the default
  2. Leave reasoning off unless the text needs it. It moves the call to Lara Think at $2,499 per million characters
  3. Resolve glossary and memory names to gls_* and mem_* IDs with the list tools before translating
  4. Send one target language per translate call
  5. Merge short documents, since each file bills at least 20,000 characters

Lingo.dev

  1. Send X-API-Key to https://api.lingo.dev and keep the key server-side. On non-Enterprise plans a personal key reaches every engine its creator can
  2. Use POST /process/localize for one language pair and POST /jobs/localization with an idempotencyKey for several. Pipeline stages run on async jobs only
  3. Treat 402 (credit limit) and 429 (daily token quota) as limits to report, not to retry. Retry 500 with backoff
  4. Read usage.cost on each sync response to track spend. Sandbox stops at 100,000 tokens a day
  5. Connect MCP clients to https://mcp.lingo.dev/account. Its tools can create and revoke API keys and invite members, so ask before those calls

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Lara Translate API or Lingo.dev?

Lingo.dev scores 62.3 (B) on agent readiness against Lara Translate API's 61.3 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Lara Translate API leads on schema & documentation and payments & pricing.

Do Lara Translate API and Lingo.dev need an API key?

Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

Can an agent call Lara Translate API and Lingo.dev without installing anything?

Yes. Lara Translate API has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp-v2.laratranslate.com/v1 and Lingo.dev at https://mcp.lingo.dev/account.

Other comparisons with Lara Translate API or Lingo.dev

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report