Head to head · Local inference · October 2026 research run
KoboldCpp vs Lemonade
Lemonade scores 63.8 (B) on agent readiness against KoboldCpp's 60.5 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. KoboldCpp leads on maintenance & community. Both do local inference.
Which one, for what
Good for An owner who wants text, image, speech and music models behind one executable with a writing and roleplay interface, and clients that speak the KoboldAI, OpenAI, Ollama or Anthropic formats.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 76
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
With no --host the server accepts connections on all routable interfaces, and no password is set by default
Lemonade B
Good for An owner with AMD hardware (Ryzen AI NPUs, Radeon or Strix Halo) who wants one local server for chat, speech and images that existing OpenAI, Anthropic or Ollama clients can call, and for MCP clients that want local models as tools.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 75 against 68
- Agent ergonomics, 70 against 63
- Transparency & trust, 64 against 49
Watch for
No authentication by default. With no key set, every route answers, including /internal/* shutdown and configuration
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | KoboldCpp | Lemonade | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 75 | Lemonade +7 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 68 | 70 | Lemonade +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 63 | 70 | Lemonade +7 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 38 | 36 | KoboldCpp +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 76 | KoboldCpp +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 49 | 64 | Lemonade +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 60.5 · C | 63.8 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | KoboldCpp | Lemonade |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | LostRuins (Concedo) | AMD and the Lemonade community |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 for KoboldCpp and KoboldAI Lite. The bundled GGML, llama.cpp and stable-diffusion.cpp code stays under MIT | Apache 2.0. Each backend (llama.cpp, whisper.cpp, stable-diffusion.cpp, FastFlowLM and others) is downloaded separately under its own licence |
| Tools exposed | none | 6 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-27 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 12k stars | 5.8k stars |
Verdicts
KoboldCpp
One file runs text, image, speech and music models behind a published OpenAPI 3.0.3 document, with eight releases in 90 days. The server listens on every interface with no password by default, and --password leaves the image routes open.
Lemonade
Apache 2.0, with weekly releases, installers for Windows, macOS and five Linux routes, and a six-tool MCP endpoint whose descriptions steer a caller away from accidental multi-gigabyte downloads. Authentication is off by default, the repository has no security policy, and the docs tell WebSocket clients to pass the key in the URL.
Before you call either
KoboldCpp
- Start with
--host 127.0.0.1and--password. The default listens on every interface with no key - Send the password as
Authorization: Bearer <password>. It is not read from the query string - Treat 503 as both busy and rate limited. The server never sends 429 or
Retry-After, and the wait in seconds is indetail.msg - Pass
max_lengthormax_tokens. The default is 2,048 tokens unless--defaultgenamtchanges it - Send a
genkeywith each generation so/api/extra/generate/checkand/api/extra/abortact on your request and not another caller's
Lemonade
- Call
lemonade_list_models(orGET /v1/models) before naming a model. A wrong name withallow_download: truecan start a multi-gigabyte download - Send
Authorization: Bearer <key>when the operator has setLEMONADE_API_KEY./internal/*needs the admin key when one is set - Use
POST /v1/chat/completionsfor streamed tokens, embeddings and speech. The MCP endpoint ignoresstreamand has no embeddings or text-to-speech tool - Pass
output_dirtolemonade_generate_imageandlemonade_omnito get file paths in place of inline base64. Writes stay inside the MCP media sandbox - Read
GET /v1/docson the running server for the reference that matches its version. Weekly releases change behaviour
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, KoboldCpp or Lemonade?
Lemonade scores 63.8 (B) on agent readiness against KoboldCpp's 60.5 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. KoboldCpp leads on maintenance & community.
Do KoboldCpp and Lemonade need an API key?
KoboldCpp needs no key. Lemonade needs an API key.
Can an agent call KoboldCpp and Lemonade without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for KoboldCpp. No hosted endpoint is listed for Lemonade.
Are KoboldCpp and Lemonade open source?
Yes. KoboldCpp is open source (AGPL-3.0 for KoboldCpp and KoboldAI Lite. The bundled GGML, llama.cpp and stable-diffusion.cpp code stays under MIT). Lemonade is open source (Apache 2.0. Each backend (llama.cpp, whisper.cpp, stable-diffusion.cpp, FastFlowLM and others) is downloaded separately under its own licence).
Other comparisons with KoboldCpp or Lemonade
- AnythingLLM vs KoboldCpp
- AnythingLLM vs Lemonade
- Docker Model Runner vs KoboldCpp
- Docker Model Runner vs Lemonade
- Foundry Local vs KoboldCpp
- Foundry Local vs Lemonade
- Core vs KoboldCpp
- Core vs Lemonade
- GPT4All vs KoboldCpp
- GPT4All vs Lemonade
- Jan vs KoboldCpp
- Jan vs Lemonade
- Khoj vs KoboldCpp
- Khoj vs Lemonade
- KoboldCpp vs llama.cpp
- KoboldCpp vs LM Studio
- KoboldCpp vs LocalAI
- KoboldCpp vs MLX LM
- KoboldCpp vs Ollama
- KoboldCpp vs Open WebUI
- KoboldCpp vs screenpipe
- KoboldCpp vs TextGen
- Lemonade vs llama.cpp
- Lemonade vs LM Studio
- Lemonade vs LocalAI
- Lemonade vs MLX LM
- Lemonade vs Ollama
- Lemonade vs Open WebUI
- Lemonade vs screenpipe
- Lemonade vs TextGen
- KoboldCpp vs Underdog
- Lemonade vs Underdog
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/koboldcpp-vs-lemonade.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/koboldcpp.json·/api/v1/tools/lemonade.json - From a terminal
anchor compare koboldcpp lemonade(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "koboldcpp", "b": "lemonade"}at/mcp, no key