Head to head · Recruiting candidates · October 2026 research run
Greenhouse vs Zoho Recruit
Greenhouse scores 64.8 (B) on agent readiness against Zoho Recruit's 59.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Zoho Recruit leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do recruiting candidates.
Which one, for what
Good for An agent working inside a company that already runs hiring on Greenhouse and needs to read pipelines, move applications, schedule interviews or draft offer records under scoped OAuth.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 79 against 46
- Security & auth, 85 against 65
- Maintenance & community, 65 against 48
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No public price, free tier or trial. Pricing is customised through sales, and the sandbox is a Pro-tier feature
Good for Small businesses and staffing agencies on Zoho that want an agent to read and write candidates, job openings, applications and interviews with narrow scopes, and teams that want a free edition with API access.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 76 against 71
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 0
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No OpenAPI description found. The public repository zoho/recruit-oas is empty
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Greenhouse | Zoho Recruit | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 71 | 76 | Zoho Recruit +5 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 79 | 46 | Greenhouse +33 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 63 | 64 | Zoho Recruit +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 85 | 65 | Greenhouse +20 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 35 | Zoho Recruit +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 65 | 48 | Greenhouse +17 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 79 | 77 | Greenhouse +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 64.8 · B | 59.8 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Greenhouse | Zoho Recruit |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Greenhouse Software, Inc. | Zoho |
| Hosted endpoint | https://harvest.greenhouse.io/v3 | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Greenhouse's Master Subscription Agreement. The docs repository for the older APIs on GitHub is Apache-2.0 | Proprietary service under Zoho's Terms of Service |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2026-02-01 | 2022-03-02 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-28 | 2025-12-22 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
Verdicts
Greenhouse
Harvest v3 pairs per-endpoint OAuth scopes with Markdown docs that embed an OpenAPI 3.1 definition for each call, and the beta MCP server blocks every DELETE. Access needs a paying customer account, with no public price, trial or self-serve sandbox, and no numeric rate limit or idempotency key was found in the reviewed documentation.
Zoho Recruit
OAuth scopes narrow to one module and one operation, the docs have an llms.txt index with a Markdown page per endpoint, and the Free edition includes 5,000 API credits a day. No OpenAPI description, official SDK, SLA or dated API changelog was found, and the documented token refresh puts the client secret in the URL.
Before you call either
Greenhouse
- Request a token from https://auth.greenhouse.io/token with client credentials, then send it as a Bearer token to https://harvest.greenhouse.io/v3. Tokens expire, so repeat on 401
- Put filters and
per_pageon the first list request only. Acursormust be the only query parameter, or the call returns 422 - Send the current stage as
from_stage_idwhen moving an application. It guards against stale moves. Other writes have no idempotency key, so check before retrying - Read
X-RateLimit-Remainingon every response and wait forRetry-Afteron 429. The window is 30 seconds - Expect empty list results or 403 unless the token's user is a Site Admin with the needed permissions
Zoho Recruit
- Use the
api_domainreturned with the token, or the regional host (recruit.zoho.com, recruit.zoho.eu, recruit.zoho.in and others). Tokens from one data centre fail on another - Send
Authorization: Zoho-oauthtoken <token>and refresh hourly. Put refresh parameters in the POST body, not the URL - Pass
fieldson list calls and page withpageandper_page(200 at most) untilmore_recordsis false - Create through
/{module_api_name}/upsertwithduplicate_check_fieldsso a retry updates instead of duplicating - Move a candidate with
PUT /{module_api_name}/status, not upsert. Passtrigger: []on writes to skip workflows, approvals and blueprints
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Greenhouse or Zoho Recruit?
Greenhouse scores 64.8 (B) on agent readiness against Zoho Recruit's 59.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Zoho Recruit leads on reliability and payments & pricing.
Do Greenhouse and Zoho Recruit need an API key?
Both use an OAuth sign-in.
Can an agent call Greenhouse and Zoho Recruit without installing anything?
Greenhouse has a hosted endpoint at https://harvest.greenhouse.io/v3. No hosted endpoint is listed for Zoho Recruit.
Other comparisons with Greenhouse or Zoho Recruit
- Ashby vs Greenhouse
- Ashby vs Zoho Recruit
- Bullhorn vs Greenhouse
- Bullhorn vs Zoho Recruit
- Gem vs Greenhouse
- Gem vs Zoho Recruit
- Greenhouse vs Lever
- Greenhouse vs Pinpoint
- Greenhouse vs Recruitee
- Greenhouse vs SmartRecruiters
- Greenhouse vs Workable
- Lever vs Zoho Recruit
- Pinpoint vs Zoho Recruit
- Recruitee vs Zoho Recruit
- SmartRecruiters vs Zoho Recruit
- Workable vs Zoho Recruit
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/greenhouse-vs-zoho-recruit.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/greenhouse.json·/api/v1/tools/zoho-recruit.json - From a terminal
anchor compare greenhouse zoho-recruit(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "greenhouse", "b": "zoho-recruit"}at/mcp, no key