Head to head · Accounting ledger · October 2026 research run
FreeAgent API vs FreshBooks API
FreeAgent API has a score of 57.6 (C) against FreshBooks API's 45.6 (E). Both do accounting ledger. The largest gap is reliability, 50 points.
Which one, for what
Pick FreeAgent API for
- reliability (+50)
- maintenance & community (+46)
- transparency & trust (+10)
Pick FreshBooks API for
- agent ergonomics (+6)
- security & auth (+13)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | FreeAgent API | FreshBooks API | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 85 | 35 | FreeAgent API +50 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 50 | 48 | FreeAgent API +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 61 | FreshBooks API +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 57 | FreshBooks API +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 30 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 60 | 14 | FreeAgent API +46 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 78 | 68 | FreeAgent API +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 57.6 · C | 45.6 · E |
Facts side by side
| Fact | FreeAgent API | FreshBooks API |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | FreeAgent | FreshBooks |
| Hosted endpoint | https://api.freeagent.com/v2 | https://api.freshbooks.com |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth |
| Pricing | Your plan | Your plan |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2024-09-11 |
| Popularity | none | 11 stars, 685 npm/wk, 415 PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
FreeAgent API
Published limits of 120 requests a minute and 3,600 an hour per user, with Retry-After on 429. No OAuth scopes, so a token can do anything the authorising user can.
FreshBooks API
OAuth scopes split read and write per resource, such as user:invoices:read. Rate limits have no numbers, status code or headers.
Before you call either
FreeAgent API
- Store the new refresh token from every refresh response. The old one stops working
- Create the invoice, then PUT /v2/invoices/:id/transitions/mark_as_sent. A draft isn't visible to the customer
- Record a customer payment by explaining the bank transaction against the invoice. There's no invoice payments endpoint
- Send X-RateLimit-Test: true in the sandbox to see the 429 and Retry-After path before production does it to you
- Use view= and updated_since= on list calls and per_page up to 100 to stay under 120 requests a minute
FreshBooks API
- Call /auth/api/v1/users/me first and keep both ids. Accounting endpoints take account_id, projects and time tracking take business_id
- Serialise token refreshes. Issuing a new refresh token kills the old one at once
- Mark an invoice as sent (action_mark_as_sent) or email it. Reports ignore drafts
- Send x-api-version: 2023-09-25 on journal entry calls
- Back off on any throttling response yourself. There's no Retry-After to read and no published limit
Other comparisons with FreeAgent API or FreshBooks API
- Apideck Accounting API + MCP vs FreeAgent API
- Apideck Accounting API + MCP vs FreshBooks API
- FreeAgent API vs Merge Accounting API
- FreeAgent API vs QuickBooks Online API + MCP
- FreeAgent API vs Rutter Accounting API
- FreeAgent API vs Xero API + MCP
- FreshBooks API vs Merge Accounting API
- FreshBooks API vs QuickBooks Online API + MCP
- FreshBooks API vs Rutter Accounting API
- FreshBooks API vs Xero API + MCP
- FreeAgent API vs Invoice Ninja API
- FreshBooks API vs Invoice Ninja API
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/freeagent.json·/api/v1/tools/freshbooks.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/freeagent-vs-freshbooks.md