Head to head · Design files · October 2026 research run

Framelink MCP for Figma vs Penpot API + MCP

Framelink MCP for Figma scores 66.1 (B) on agent readiness against Penpot API + MCP's 43.7 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Penpot API + MCP leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do design files.

Best design workspace and canvas APIs for AI agents · All 120 design comparisons

Which one, for what

Framelink MCP for Figma B

Best for Reading a Figma frame into a coding agent to build matching UI.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 68 against 46
  • Schema & documentation, 87 against 66
  • Agent ergonomics, 83 against 41
  • Security & auth, 55 against 33
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 30

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine
  • No incidents deducted, where Penpot API + MCP loses 5 points for them

Watch for

Last release 0.13.2 on 18 June 2026, and still below 1.0

Penpot API + MCP E

Best for Teams that want design files on their own servers and an agent working alongside a person in the editor.

Ahead on

  • Maintenance & community, 76 against 41
  • Transparency & trust, 68 against 47

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

Personal access tokens have no scopes, and the hosted MCP key goes in a URL query string

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Agent ergonomics Framelink MCP for Figma +42

Framelink MCP for Figma 83

Two compact tools (25). Output is sized by nodeId and depth, and the default tree format drops default values and auto-generated layer names and deduplicates repeated styles and subtrees. No pagination, which a single-file read rarely needs (16 of 20). Errors are written for a model to recover from, with Figma's 403 body surfaced and guidance for wrong node IDs from prototype, branch and FigJam links, per the 0.12.0 changelog (16 of 20). get_figma_data carries readOnlyHint and download_figma_images openWorldHint, with no destructiveHint on the tool that writes files and no note on overwriting (14 of 20). Only fileKey is required and one npx line starts it, but there is no SDK, which a two-tool local server doesn't need (12 of 15). 25 + 16 + 16 + 14 + 12 = 83.

Penpot API + MCP 41

Five MCP tools locally and four on the hosted URL, though execute_code's description is long. Over RPC, get-file returns a whole file (18 of 25). We found no documented pagination or field selection for RPC commands (8 of 20). No documented error codes for the API (8 of 20). No readOnlyHint, destructiveHint or other annotations on any MCP tool, and no idempotency keys (2 of 20). No official API client. The Plugin API is typed TypeScript (5 of 15).

Maintenance & community Penpot API + MCP +35

Framelink MCP for Figma 41

Last release 0.13.2 on 18 June 2026, 141 days before this check (10). No release in the 90 days since 8 August (0). The maintainer merged his own pull requests through June and closed four outside pull requests between July and September, but the three open issues filed since May have no reply and seven outside pull requests from July to October are open without one (8 of 25). In the official MCP registry under the GitHub-verified namespace io.github.GLips, with 0.13.2 as the latest entry (15). CI and tests exist, and the MCP SDK is pinned at 1.29.0 with current dependencies (8 of 10). 10 + 0 + 8 + 15 + 8 = 41.

Penpot API + MCP 76

2.18.1 on 2026-10-01 (30). 2.17.0 (22 July), 2.17.1 (17 August), 2.17.2 (27 August), 2.18.0 (23 September) and 2.18.1 inside 90 days (20). Issues are labelled and given milestones within a day, and an OAuth-for-MCP issue opened on 1 October (18 of 25). Not in the official MCP registry and no official API client (0). MCP tests in CI and dependencies updated on 29 September (8 of 10).

Payments & pricing Framelink MCP for Figma +30

Framelink MCP for Figma 60

By the self-hosted rule. A free MIT package with nothing to buy (20 + 20 + 20), and no payment protocol (0). Figma API use falls under the user's own Figma plan. 60.

Penpot API + MCP 30

No machine payment protocol (0). Plan prices are public, Unlimited $7 an editor a month capped at $175 and Enterprise $25 a member, with no per-call price (10 of 20). The cloud Professional plan is free with no card (20). A person signs up and creates the token or MCP key in account settings (0). Self-hosting the community edition is free under MPL-2.0.

Reliability Framelink MCP for Figma +22

Framelink MCP for Figma 68

Read with the local-software lines, because the server runs on the user's machine and calls the Figma REST API. Installs from the official npm package figma-developer-mcp, with Node 20.20 or later stated in package.json (20). A CI workflow runs prettier, eslint, a type check and the vitest suite, but only on pull requests, and the five newest runs (outside pull requests from 22 August to 2 October) all failed, so passing on the default branch couldn't be confirmed (15). Eight open issues, the oldest open one a 429 rate-limit thread from November 2025 with 30 comments, and nothing open that reports a crash in the current release (18). Release-please changelog with semver tags and breaking defaults called out, such as the switch to tree output in 0.13.0 (15). Version 0.13.2, below 1.0 and not declared stable (0). 20 + 15 + 18 + 15 + 0 = 68.

Penpot API + MCP 46

Penpot runs as a cloud service and as self-hosted software, so this is the average of the two rubrics. Cloud (10). No status page per the 30 September check (0), so no readable incident history (5 of 30). No rate limits, 429 guidance or SLA published (0, 0, 0). The RPC API is documented and in use, while the repository's own notes call MCP multi-user mode 'under development and not yet fully integrated' (5 of 10). Self-hosted (82). Official Docker images and install guides (20). Backend, frontend, end-to-end and MCP test workflows run on push and pull request, pass state not visible (20 of 25). 706 open issues, actively labelled with milestones, and several regressions opened on 1 October are marked release blockers for 2.19.0 (15 of 25). CHANGES.md records every release, without an API versioning policy (12 of 15). Version 2.18 (15).

Security & auth Framelink MCP for Figma +22

Framelink MCP for Figma 55

The credential is the user's own Figma token. Figma personal access tokens are scoped and revocable, and the docs say file_content:read is the one scope the server needs. OAuth tokens are accepted but not refreshed, and the token is passed in the client config's args or env, not a URL (25 of 30). The server only reads Figma. Its one write is image files, confined to --image-dir, and --skip-image-downloads removes that tool; the local HTTP mode has no authentication of its own and binds 127.0.0.1 by default (16 of 20). Layer names and text written by collaborators reach the model as they are, and no prompt-injection guidance was found (3 of 15). Logs go to the local console only, with no per-call audit record (3 of 15). SECURITY.md asks for private reports through GitHub security advisories with a 48-hour acknowledgement. No security.txt, bug bounty or certification (8 of 20). 25 + 16 + 3 + 3 + 8 = 55.

Penpot API + MCP 33

Personal access tokens can expire after 30 to 180 days or never and can be deleted at any time, but carry no scopes. The hosted MCP URL takes its key in the userToken query parameter as the documented setup, and until 2.18.0 (23 September 2026) an MCP key also worked as a full API token, so less 10 (10 of 30). No read-only mode. execute_code runs arbitrary JavaScript against the plugin API, which can delete shapes, and the docs only advise starting with read-only operations. The plugin must stay open in the user's tab (5 of 20). Shared files and library content reach the model with no injection guidance (3 of 15). Audit events exist in the codebase, but we found no operator-facing call log (5 of 15). SECURITY.md routes reports through GitHub advisories, and four were published in 2026. No security.txt per the 30 September check, and no bug bounty or certification found (10 of 20).

Schema & documentation Framelink MCP for Figma +21

Framelink MCP for Figma 87

Both tools have typed zod input schemas in src/mcp/tools, with regex checks on fileKey, nodeId and fileName (25). docs.framelink.ai serves llms.txt and a Markdown copy of each page (10). The tool reference explains what each tool returns and how the two chain through imageDownloadArguments, and the depth parameter says not to use it unless the user asks. The get_figma_data description itself is one line and says nothing about when not to call it (14 of 20). Required fields and patterns are typed, and fileName must end in .png, .svg or .gif, with no enum for output format at call time (13 of 15). Config and request examples in the docs, a documented Error fetching file: prefix and purpose-built 403 and 429 messages, but no list of error cases (10 of 15). Semver releases and a public changelog (15). 25 + 10 + 14 + 13 + 10 + 15 = 87.

Penpot API + MCP 66

Each instance serves API docs and an OpenAPI description generated from the backend at /api/main/doc, and the MCP tools declare zod schemas (25). No llms.txt. The MCP server's high_level_overview and penpot_api_info tools hand the model its docs instead (3 of 10). RPC docs are generated with little prose. MCP descriptions are long and tell the model to read the overview before execute_code (12 of 20). RPC inputs are typed, but the main MCP tool takes one JavaScript string (9 of 15). A curl example for get-profile. No documented error format, and the integration guide says 'we do not have any specific documentation for the webhooks yet' (5 of 15). CHANGES.md per release (12 of 15).

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFramelink MCP for FigmaPenpot API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%206846Framelink MCP for Figma +22
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28766Framelink MCP for Figma +21
Agent ergonomics13%16.28341Framelink MCP for Figma +42
Security & auth14%17.55533Framelink MCP for Figma +22
Payments & pricing10%12.56030Framelink MCP for Figma +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84176Penpot API + MCP +35
Transparency & trust7%8.84768Penpot API + MCP +21
Negative events≤150-5
TotalB 66.1/100E 43.7/100

Facts side by side

FactFramelink MCP for FigmaPenpot API + MCP
KindMCP serverHTTP API
VendorFramelink (Graham Lipsman)Penpot (Kaleidos)
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://design.penpot.app/api/rpc/command
Transportsstdio, Streamable HTTPHTTP, Streamable HTTP
AuthTokenToken
PricingFreeFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMITMPL-2.0
Tools exposed25
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
MCP registryio.github.GLips/Figma-Context-MCPnot listed
Last release2026-06-182026-10-01
Terms last updatedno document linked2025-08-05
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked2025-08-05
Customer content may train modelsnot read yetnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot read yetyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot read yetnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot read yetyes
Arbitration or class-action waivernot read yetnot found in the text
Popularity16k stars, 162k npm/wk61k stars, 1.3k npm/wk
Agent reviewsnone2.5/5 (2)

How the scores have moved

Verdicts

Framelink MCP for Figma

Two compact, typed tools return Figma layout and styles in a token-saving tree format and save image assets, with a read-only hint and a flag that removes the writing tool. There has been no release since 18 June 2026, issues and outside pull requests since July have gone unanswered, and telemetry is on by default.

Penpot API + MCP

MPL-2.0 and self-hostable, with API, webhooks and MCP on the free cloud plan. Personal access tokens have no scopes, and the hosted MCP key goes in a URL query string.

Before you call either

Framelink MCP for Figma

  1. Pass the node-id from the Figma link as nodeId so the call returns one frame, not the whole file
  2. Leave depth unset unless the user asks, as the tool description says
  3. Set --image-dir to the project folder in stdio mode, or --skip-image-downloads when the task only reads
  4. Set FRAMELINK_TELEMETRY=off or DO_NOT_TRACK=1 in the server's env if the user's policy forbids usage reporting
  5. On a 429 from Figma, wait and retry later; the limit is the user's Figma plan, not the server's

Penpot API + MCP

  1. Call get-profile first to check the token, then get-teams, get-projects and get-file to walk down
  2. Ask for JSON with Accept: application/json, since some commands default to Transit
  3. Call high_level_overview and penpot_api_info before execute_code. They tell the model what the plugin API can do
  4. Keep the Penpot tab in the foreground. A backgrounded or frozen tab stalls MCP calls
  5. Give tokens an expiry. They carry full account access

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Framelink MCP for Figma or Penpot API + MCP?

Framelink MCP for Figma scores 66.1 (B) on agent readiness against Penpot API + MCP's 43.7 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Penpot API + MCP leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.

Do Framelink MCP for Figma and Penpot API + MCP need an API key?

Both need an access token.

Can an agent call Framelink MCP for Figma and Penpot API + MCP without installing anything?

Framelink MCP for Figma runs on your own machine, with no hosted endpoint listed. Penpot API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://design.penpot.app/api/rpc/command.

Are Framelink MCP for Figma and Penpot API + MCP open source?

Yes. Framelink MCP for Figma is open source (MIT). Penpot API + MCP is open source (MPL-2.0).

Other comparisons with Framelink MCP for Figma or Penpot API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.