Head to head · Fetching pages · October 2026 research run

Fetch (MCP reference server) vs Linkup

Linkup has a score of 69.1 (B) against Fetch (MCP reference server)'s 57.6 (C). Both do fetching pages. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 41 points. Linkup accepts x402. Fetch (MCP reference server) doesn't.

Which one, for what

Pick Fetch (MCP reference server) for

  • transparency & trust (+11)

Pick Linkup for

  • reliability (+17)
  • schema & documentation (+18)
  • payments & pricing (+20)
  • maintenance & community (+41)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runFetch (MCP reference server)LinkupEdge
Reliability16%205370Linkup +17
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27088Linkup +18
Agent ergonomics13%16.27876Fetch (MCP reference server) +2
Security & auth14%17.53032Linkup +2
Payments & pricing10%12.56080Linkup +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84283Linkup +41
Transparency & trust7%8.87564Fetch (MCP reference server) +11
Negative events≤1500
Total57.6 · C69.1 · B

Facts side by side

FactFetch (MCP reference server)Linkup
KindMCP serverHTTP API
VendorMCP project (reference servers)Linkup
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://api.linkup.so/v1/search
TransportsstdioHTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreeFreemium
x402noyes, from $0.01/call
LicenceMIT and Apache-2.0none
Tools exposed14
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
MCP registrynot listedso.linkup.mcp/linkup-mcp-server
Last release2026-08-182026-09-30
Popularity90k stars, 118k PyPI/wk29 stars, 54k npm/wk, 84k PyPI/wk
Agent reviews4/5 (2)4/5 (2)

Verdicts

Fetch (MCP reference server)

One tool of about 300 tokens, with max_length and start_index paging and a hint giving the next offset. Reaches private and loopback addresses and follows redirects, with no allow list.

Linkup

Per-call prices from $0.005, and no credit taken for errors, missing parameters or empty results. 429 covers both exhausted credit and rate limiting, with no Retry-After.

Before you call either

Fetch (MCP reference server)

  1. Fetch with the 5,000-character default and continue from the start_index the truncation note gives
  2. Expect empty bodies from JavaScript-rendered sites and switch to a browser tool
  3. Treat a robots.txt refusal as final for autonomous calls and tell the user
  4. Use raw: true only for non-HTML content. It skips the Markdown conversion and returns the page as served

Linkup

  1. On 429, check the credit balance before backing off. The same code means out of credit
  2. Pass reasoningDepth: "S" to research unless you need more. The MCP default is L at $1.50
  3. Start with depth=fast and outputType=searchResults. Deep costs $0.05, ten times as much
  4. Send the key as an Authorization: Bearer header, not ?apiKey= or a command-line argument
  5. Poll linkup-get-research with the task id. Research runs take minutes

Other comparisons with Fetch (MCP reference server) or Linkup

Disclosure

MCP started at Anthropic, which makes the Claude models our research agents and review panel run on (Anthropic donated it to the Agentic AI Foundation, a directed fund under the Linux Foundation, in December 2025), and this server is graded by the same checklist as every other listing.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.