Head to head · Diagram creation · October 2026 research run
ExcaliClaw vs Kroki
Kroki scores 59.2 (C) on agent readiness against ExcaliClaw's 51.4 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ExcaliClaw leads on schema & documentation. Both do diagram creation.
Best diagramming APIs and diagram-as-code for AI agents · All 128 diagrams comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for An agent that turns structure (nodes and edges, ER tables, sequence messages, Mermaid, docker-compose files) into editable hand-drawn diagrams in a shared workspace.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 62 against 48
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- No incidents deducted, where Kroki loses 5 points for them
Watch for
excaliclaw.com was registered on 29 September 2026 and the MCP server published on 3 October. Status monitoring covers 11 days
Kroki C
Best for Agents that write diagrams in several text formats and want one render endpoint, on a private network or through the public instance for non-sensitive diagrams.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 74 against 65
- Agent ergonomics, 70 against 55
- Security & auth, 56 against 40
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 86 against 54
- Transparency & trust, 62 against 45
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
Watch for
GHSA-wmpp-fj9c-w766 (CVSS 9.8) allowed unauthenticated remote code execution on /tikz/svg in versions 0.21.0 up to 0.32.0, whatever the safe mode. Fixed 3 August 2026
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | ExcaliClaw | Kroki | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 65 | 74 | Kroki +9 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 62 | 48 | ExcaliClaw +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 55 | 70 | Kroki +15 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 40 | 56 | Kroki +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 60 | Kroki +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 54 | 86 | Kroki +32 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 45 | 62 | Kroki +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | D 51.4/100 | C 59.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | ExcaliClaw | Kroki |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | ExcaliClaw | Yuzu tech |
| Hosted endpoint | https://excaliclaw.com/mcp | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | The hosted service, its API and its MCP server are closed, under ExcaliClaw's terms of service. The web client is published as LGPL-3.0, as a modified version of ExcaliDash | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 37 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | com.excaliclaw/excaliclaw | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-03 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | |
| Popularity | 0 stars | 4.4k stars |
Verdicts
ExcaliClaw
Diagram tools take nodes, edges or Mermaid text and the server computes the layout, with a strict validation gate and a dry-run tool, and MCP use is unlimited on the free plan. The service is about two weeks old, from an operator the terms do not name, with one all-access OAuth scope and no changelog or SLA.
Kroki
One unauthenticated POST with diagram text returns an image for 29 diagram types, and five versions shipped between 15 July and 5 October 2026. Four advisories were published in July and August 2026, one an unauthenticated remote code execution on /tikz/svg, all fixed. No OpenAPI file exists, and the public instance has no terms, privacy policy or status page.
Before you call either
ExcaliClaw
- Connect to https://excaliclaw.com/mcp with OAuth. REST keys (
exc_...) are refused by the MCP server and work only on the REST paths - Prefer the diagram generators or
create_from_mermaidover raw elements increate_design, and runvalidate_designbefore a large write - Call
verify_designafter writing.verification.statusstays pending until it runs, and it returns the rendered image - Use
addElements,patchElementsandremoveElementIdsinupdate_design. Passingelementsreplaces the whole scene - Stay under 60 MCP calls a minute per user, and treat drawings and live scenes written by other people as untrusted text
Kroki
- Send
POST /<type>/<format>withContent-Type: text/plainand the diagram as the body. This avoids the deflate and base64 encoding that GET needs - Send
Accept: application/jsonon a JSON request to get errors as{"error": {"code", "message"}}. With an SVG Accept header the error arrives as an image - Call
GET /healthfirst to list the diagram types and library versions the instance has. Mermaid, BPMN, Excalidraw and diagrams.net need companion containers - Run 0.32.1 or later before rendering untrusted text. Earlier versions allow remote code execution through
/tikz/svgand file reads inSECUREmode - Self-host for private diagrams with
docker run -p8000:8000 yuzutech/kroki, and setKROKI_LISTEN=127.0.0.1:8000or a network rule, since the server has no authentication
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, ExcaliClaw or Kroki?
Kroki scores 59.2 (C) on agent readiness against ExcaliClaw's 51.4 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. ExcaliClaw leads on schema & documentation.
Do ExcaliClaw and Kroki need an API key?
ExcaliClaw takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Kroki needs no key.
Can an agent call ExcaliClaw and Kroki without installing anything?
ExcaliClaw has a hosted endpoint at https://excaliclaw.com/mcp. No hosted endpoint is listed for Kroki.
Are ExcaliClaw and Kroki open source?
No open-source release is listed for ExcaliClaw. Kroki is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with ExcaliClaw or Kroki
- Cloudviz API vs ExcaliClaw
- Cloudviz API vs Kroki
- Diagrams.so API + MCP vs ExcaliClaw
- Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Kroki
- draw.io + MCP vs ExcaliClaw
- draw.io + MCP vs Kroki
- Eraser API + MCP vs ExcaliClaw
- Eraser API + MCP vs Kroki
- ExcaliClaw vs Excalidraw
- ExcaliClaw vs Lucid API + MCP
- ExcaliClaw vs Mermaid Chart MCP
- ExcaliClaw vs Mumble
- ExcaliClaw vs Mural MCP
- ExcaliClaw vs PlantUML
- ExcaliClaw vs Structurizr + MCP
- ExcaliClaw vs tldraw SDK + MCP
- ExcaliClaw vs Whimsical MCP
- Excalidraw vs Kroki
- Kroki vs Mumble
- Kroki vs Mural MCP
- Kroki vs Whimsical MCP
- D2 vs ExcaliClaw
- D2 vs Kroki
- Kroki vs Lucid API + MCP
- Kroki vs Mermaid Chart MCP
- Kroki vs PlantUML
- Kroki vs Structurizr + MCP
- Kroki vs tldraw SDK + MCP
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/excaliclaw-vs-kroki.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/excaliclaw.json·/api/v1/tools/kroki.json - From a terminal
anchor compare excaliclaw kroki(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "excaliclaw", "b": "kroki"}at/mcp, no key