Head to head · Identity verification · October 2026 research run
Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Veriff
Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Veriff's 61.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Veriff leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do identity verification.
Best identity and business verification APIs for AI agents · All 119 verification comparisons
Which one, for what
Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) B
Best for A company already contracted with Entrust that wants an agent to create applicants, start workflow runs and read reports through typed libraries and a public spec.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 62
- Agent ergonomics, 65 against 43
Watch for
entrust.com answered 403 to every request, so the terms, privacy notice, pricing page and security.txt weren't read
Veriff C
Best for A team that needs document and selfie verification with public per-verification prices and a trial, and that can run a webhook receiver and HMAC signing.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 63 against 58
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 74 against 58
Watch for
No server-side SDK and no MCP server. Official packages cover only browser and mobile capture
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) | Veriff | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 62 | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) +8 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 82 | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 65 | 43 | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) +22 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 58 | 63 | Veriff +5 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 40 | Veriff +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 74 | Veriff +16 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 70 | 67 | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.1/100 | C 61.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) | Veriff |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Onfido Ltd (Entrust) | Veriff OÜ |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Entrust's terms. The OpenAPI spec and the server libraries (onfido-java, onfido-node, onfido-php, onfido-python, onfido-ruby) are MIT | Proprietary service. The npm capture SDKs are ISC (@veriff/js-sdk, @veriff/incontext-sdk) and MIT (@veriff/react-native-sdk) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-10-02 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-04-16 | |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 59k npm/wk, 27k PyPI/wk | 32 stars, 110k npm/wk |
Verdicts
Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido)
The v3.6 API has a public MIT OpenAPI file, server libraries in five languages, OAuth client credentials with scopes and an 18-month deprecation notice. Entrust's own site answered 403, so terms, privacy notice, pricing and security.txt weren't read. There is no idempotency key, and live tokens need a Dashboard account with billing details.
Veriff
Per-verification prices are public from $0.80, with a 15-day trial of 50 sessions and no card. Each endpoint page is Markdown with an OpenAPI 3.0 fragment. There is no server SDK, MCP server or idempotency key, most calls need an HMAC signature, and the status page shows nine incidents between 20 July and 7 October 2026.
Before you call either
Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido)
- Use the regional host for the account (api.eu, api.us or api.ca.onfido.com/v3.6). v3.6 has no default region
- Prefer an OAuth client with only the scopes the task needs over a live API token, and refresh the 60-minute access token
- Stay under 400 requests a minute live and 120 in sandbox, and back off on a 429
rate_limiterror - Check before retrying a POST. There is no idempotency key, so a retry can create a second applicant or check
- Treat webhook events as duplicates or out of order, and verify
X-SHA2-Signatureover the raw body
Veriff
- Take the base URL from the integration's API keys page. Send X-AUTH-CLIENT on every call and store verification.id from POST /v1/sessions
- Sign POST and PATCH bodies, and the session ID on GET and DELETE, with HMAC-SHA256 in X-HMAC-SIGNATURE. POST /v1/sessions needs no signature
- Stay under 30 session creations a minute on Self-Serve, 600 on Enterprise. A 429 carries code 1004
- Don't blindly retry POST /v1/sessions. Each call makes a new session, which is billed on a live integration
- Poll GET /v1/sessions/{id}/decision until
verificationis not null, or accept webhooks within 5 seconds and treat duplicates as normal
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) or Veriff?
Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Veriff's 61.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Veriff leads on security & auth, payments & pricing and maintenance & community.
Do Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) and Veriff need an API key?
Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. Veriff needs an API key.
Can an agent call Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) and Veriff without installing anything?
No hosted endpoint is listed for Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido). No hosted endpoint is listed for Veriff.
Other comparisons with Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) or Veriff
- Alloy vs Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido)
- Alloy vs Veriff
- ComplyCube vs Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido)
- ComplyCube vs Veriff
- Didit vs Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido)
- Didit vs Veriff
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Jumio
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Middesk
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Persona
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Plaid Identity Verification
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Shufti
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Socure RiskOS
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Stripe Identity
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Sumsub
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Trulioo
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Vouched
- Jumio vs Veriff
- Middesk vs Veriff
- Persona vs Veriff
- Plaid Identity Verification vs Veriff
- Shufti vs Veriff
- Socure RiskOS vs Veriff
- Stripe Identity vs Veriff
- Sumsub vs Veriff
- Trulioo vs Veriff
- Veriff vs Vouched
- ComplyAdvantage vs Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido)
- ComplyAdvantage vs Veriff
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/entrust-identity-verification-vs-veriff.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/entrust-identity-verification.json·/api/v1/tools/veriff.json - From a terminal
anchor compare entrust-identity-verification veriff(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "entrust-identity-verification", "b": "veriff"}at/mcp, no key