Head to head · Text embeddings · October 2026 research run

EmbeddingGemma 2 vs jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small

EmbeddingGemma 2 scores 66.4 (B) on agent readiness against jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small's 50.2 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do text embeddings.

Best embedding and reranking APIs for AI agents · All 81 embeddings comparisons

Which one, for what

EmbeddingGemma 2 B

Best for Agents that need one small local embedding model for text, code, images, video and audio search

Ahead on

  • Capability, 59 against 33
  • Reach, 75 against 65
  • Risk, 60 against 45
  • Agent interface, 70 against 65
  • Documentation and upkeep, 80 against 69

Watch for

The card requires deployments to follow the Gemma Prohibited Use Policy, which Google can update

jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small D

Best for Non-commercial agents that want one local index across text, images, video and audio, or to extend a jina-embeddings-v5-text index

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

CC BY-NC 4.0, so commercial use needs a separate licence from Jina

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runEmbeddingGemma 2jina-embeddings-v5-omni-smallEdge
Capability35%355933EmbeddingGemma 2 +26
Reach25%257565EmbeddingGemma 2 +10
Risk20%206045EmbeddingGemma 2 +15
Agent interface10%107065EmbeddingGemma 2 +5
Documentation and upkeep10%108069EmbeddingGemma 2 +11
Negative events≤1500
TotalB 66.4/100D 50.2/100

Facts side by side

FactEmbeddingGemma 2jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorGoogle DeepMindJina AI (Elastic)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache 2.0CC-BY-NC-4.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-282026-10-11
Terms last updated2026-04-01no document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Agent reviewsnone2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

EmbeddingGemma 2

A small multimodal embedding cousin that puts text, code, images, video and audio in one 768-dimension space, with task prefixes and vectors that truncate to 128. Five common runtimes run it and the BF16 files are 1.53 GB, with a browser build for Transformers.js. The main risks are the Gemma use policy the card adds and no safety results.

jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small

A small omni embedding cousin that puts text, images, video, audio and PDFs in one 1,024-dimension space shared with jina-embeddings-v5-text-small, in 3.4 GB of BF16 files or a 0.4 GB GGUF. It's for non-commercial use only under CC BY-NC 4.0, and every way to run it executes Jina's own code or a llama.cpp fork rather than a released runtime's.

Before you call either

EmbeddingGemma 2

  1. Install sentence-transformers 6.1.0 or later and transformers 5.19.0 or later; older Sentence Transformers ignore the order of multimodal dict inputs
  2. Use prompt_name SearchQuery for queries and Document for untitled documents; write title: {title} | text: {content} yourself for titled ones, and pass images, video and audio with no prefix
  3. For text only, load with config_kwargs {"vision_config": None, "audio_config": None} to skip 470M parameters of encoders
  4. Run in bfloat16 or float32, never float16, which returns NaN or degraded vectors without an error
  5. Pass truncate_dim and normalize_embeddings=True for smaller vectors, and keep queries and documents at the same size
  6. Supply audio as mono 16 kHz; video is sampled at 1 frame a second by default

jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small

  1. Check the use is non-commercial before starting it; for commercial work call the jina-embeddings API instead
  2. Start it with pip install vllm==0.20.1, then vllm serve jinaai/jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small --trust-remote-code --hf-overrides '{"task": "retrieval"}'; one task per vLLM instance
  3. Prefix retrieval text with "Query: " or "Document: ", or use encode_query and encode_document in Sentence Transformers; for the other tasks use "Document: " only, since a bare encode is off-distribution
  4. Load only the towers you need with model_kwargs={'modality': 'vision'} (or text, audio, omni) to save memory and load time
  5. Shorten vectors with truncate_dim (Transformers, Sentence Transformers) or PoolingParams(dimensions=256) in vLLM
  6. Pass a video's audio as its own part, since the soundtrack isn't read from the video
  7. Treat retrieved documents as untrusted before passing them to another model

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, EmbeddingGemma 2 or jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small?

EmbeddingGemma 2 scores 66.4 (B) on agent readiness against jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small's 50.2 (D), and leads in every scored category.

Other comparisons with EmbeddingGemma 2 or jina-embeddings-v5-omni-small

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.