Head to head · LLM inference · October 2026 research run
Eden AI vs Together AI Inference
Together AI Inference scores 67.8 (B) on agent readiness against Eden AI's 59.9 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Eden AI leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do llm inference.
Best model APIs and inference for AI agents · All 830 models comparisons
Which one, for what
Eden AI C
Best for Teams that want one key and bill for many LLMs plus OCR, speech, translation and web tools, with EU-only processing.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 82 against 70
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Together AI Inference loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No public status page, incident history or SLA found
Best for Together AI Inference serves open models through an OpenAI-compatible API, with serverless requests, batch processing, dedicated model deployments and provisioned throughput.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 75 against 33
- Schema & documentation, 93 against 81
- Agent ergonomics, 85 against 75
- Maintenance & community, 65 against 58
- Transparency & trust, 74 against 55
Watch for
A $15 credit purchase is required before platform access; no free trial
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reliability Together AI Inference +42
Eden AI 33
Router, read on the hosted lines. No status page is linked from the site or docs, and status.edenai.co didn't resolve for us on 6 November 2026 (0). No incident history to read (5). The rate-limits page gives 10 requests a second per account, shared across keys, while the plans page gives 7 a second, raisable to 15, so the figure is documented but inconsistent (10). Fallback retries the next model or provider on a 429 or error inside one request, but no client-facing 429 or Retry-After guidance was found (8). No SLA published; 'Dedicated support & SLA' is listed only for the custom Advanced plan, and the pricing page's '99.99%' uptime is a claim without a status page behind it (0). The v3 API is GA (10). 0+5+10+8+0+10 = 33.
Together AI Inference 75
Graded as listed, on the hosted API lines. Public Better Stack status page at status.together.ai with a component for each serverless model plus the website and playground (20). The page shows 90 daily ticks per component, read on 1 November 2026 for 4 August to 1 November, and no incident was posted in that time (the feed's newest items are maintenance windows in April and July 2026). Monitors record downtime on single models, the longest Kimi K3 for 7 hours 18 minutes on 22 August and Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B for 5 hours 34 minutes on 13 August, and on the busiest days five of about 20 monitored models were down for up to 1 hour 40 minutes (14 October) or about 20 minutes (1 September). Each hit one model or a subset of the catalogue, so the record reads as minor incidents only (20). The current serverless page gives no numeric general request ceiling (0). Explicit 429 and 503 backoff guidance (15). Provisioned throughput has a published 99% eligible-request commitment (10). Serverless inference is generally available (10). 20 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 10 = 75.
Transparency & trust Together AI Inference +19
Eden AI 55
Editorial half only. Closed service under terms last updated 22 October 2026, naming Eden AI SAS and French law with courts in Lyon (15). The data retention page, terms and DPA agree that content isn't stored by default, and the docs carry a per-provider table of training, retention and ZDR (27). No deprecation policy found; models are dropped in docs updates without dated notice that we found (5). The DPA's Annex 2 names operational subprocessors (AWS EMEA, ClickHouse, Sentry, Metabase, Stripe, Brevo and others) with their roles, and the EU endpoint keeps routing in the EU (18). 15+27+5+18 = 65.
Together AI Inference 74
Proprietary service with published terms and Apache-2.0 SDK (15). Docs distinguish default content storage, training opt-in, organisation ZDR and passthrough models, but default content retention has no fixed duration in the reviewed pages (25 of 30). Public lifecycle policy gives a two-week migration window for breaking model upgrades and 2 or 3 weeks' notice for serverless removals, though removals on 19, 21, 25 and 27 August 2026 were posted only on the day (15 of 20). North American hosting and enterprise residency options are described; full subprocessor locations were not established (10 of 20).
Schema & documentation Together AI Inference +12
Eden AI 81
Router, scored on the API lines. OpenAPI 3.1 document for v3 (version 3.0.0, 46 paths) at api.edenai.run/v3/docs/openapi.json, plus a management API spec (25). llms.txt on the site and in the docs, llms-full.txt and Markdown pages (10). llms.txt states when to use Eden AI and when not to, and the docs separate chat models from expert models (17). Requests follow the OpenAI shape, and expert-model tools on the MCP server carry JSON Schema inputs (12). Examples throughout, but the spec documents only 200, 201, 202, 302 and 422, while llms.txt names 401 and 451 for region refusals (10). Versioned /v3 path, but no public changelog was found (7). 25+10+17+12+10+7 = 81.
Together AI Inference 93
Public OpenAPI 3.1 (25), llms.txt and Markdown docs (10), endpoint and model-capability guidance (16 of 20), typed inputs and constraints (13 of 15), examples and documented errors (14 of 15), and versioned endpoints with a dated changelog (15).
Security & auth Eden AI +12
Eden AI 82
Router, read on the model lines. Bearer keys with per-key budgets, expiry and attribution, a key management API, and deny-by-default guardrails that limit models per member, role or key (25). The data retention page says request and response content isn't stored and data isn't used to train models by default (18). Content logging is opt-in, async results are deleted after 7 days, and an organisation can enforce Zero Data Retention and region rules; the EU endpoint refuses non-EU models with 451 (13). Cost and provider per response, and a monitoring dashboard by key (12). The security page says Eden AI is SOC 2 and ISO 27001 certified and links a trust centre; /.well-known/security.txt returns 404 and no disclosure policy was found (14). 25+18+13+12+14 = 82.
Together AI Inference 70
Project-scoped, revocable keys with optional expiry and rotation guidance (30). Project boundaries but keys can access all project resources and lack per-key spend limits (10 of 20). No inference prompt-injection mitigation established (0). Per-key cost and usage attribution (15). Published security.txt with a future expiry and HackerOne disclosure route (15 of 20).
Agent ergonomics Together AI Inference +10
Eden AI 75
Router, read on the model lines. Chat completions, Responses and an Anthropic Messages route in the OpenAI shape, with tool calling depending on the routed model (14 of 20) and structured output likewise (10 of 15). Caching is named in the terms as part of the service, without a per-model price table we read (8 of 15). Context depends on the model; the keyless /v3/models catalogue lists capabilities, prices and regions per model so an agent can choose (12 of 15). A Batches API (10 of 10). No SDK of its own; the docs use the OpenAI Python and TypeScript SDKs, and a hosted MCP server exposes about 40 expert-model tools plus upload_file, check_job and list_models (21 of 25). 14+10+8+12+10+21 = 75.
Together AI Inference 85
Compact model API with bounded output (25). Token controls, streaming, structured outputs and batch options (20). Actionable error documentation (20). Transient retry guidance but no general inference deduplication guarantee found (5 of 20). Official Python and TypeScript SDKs and defaults (15).
Payments & pricing Eden AI +10
Eden AI 30
No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Provider prices with no markup plus a 5.5% platform fee, published per model in the keyless catalogue (20). llms.txt says some models are billed $0 for tests, but whether a new account can call them without buying credits isn't stated (10). A person signs up in a browser and buys credits through Stripe (0). 0+20+10+0 = 30.
Together AI Inference 20
No machine payment protocol found in the reviewed billing and inference docs (0). Public token and capacity prices (20). No free trial and a $15 minimum first credit purchase (0). Browser account and payment setup required (0).
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Eden AI | Together AI Inference | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 33 | 75 | Together AI Inference +42 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 81 | 93 | Together AI Inference +12 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 75 | 85 | Together AI Inference +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 82 | 70 | Eden AI +12 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 20 | Eden AI +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 65 | Together AI Inference +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 55 | 74 | Together AI Inference +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | C 59.9/100 | B 67.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Eden AI | Together AI Inference |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Model router | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Eden AI SAS | Together Computer, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | https://mcp.edenai.run/mcp | https://api.together.ai/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | none | Proprietary hosted service. The official Python SDK is Apache-2.0; served models retain their own licences. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-11-05 | 2026-10-23 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-22 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-22 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 10 stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Eden AI
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Eden AI
Eden AI gives one OpenAI-compatible key to about 1,000 models and expert models such as OCR, speech and translation, with an EU-only endpoint, per-key guardrails and no stored content by default. No status page, SLA or changelog was found, and its own pages disagree on the default rate limit.
Together AI Inference
A broad inference API with project-scoped keys, SDKs and multiple capacity options. Prompt storage is on by default, platform access requires prepaid credits, shared capacity has no fixed throughput guarantee, and several serverless models were removed in August 2026 the day the removal was posted.
Before you call either
Eden AI
- Read GET https://api.edenai.run/v3/models at run time for model ids, prices and regions instead of hard-coding them
- Use https://api.eu.edenai.run/v3 when data must stay in the EU, and pick another model on a 451 region_not_allowed
- Set max_tokens to 500 or more for reasoning models, or the answer can come back empty
- Pass a fallbacks list so a provider 429 or error retries inside one request
- Poll check_job for MCP tools marked long-running instead of calling them again
Together AI Inference
- Create a project-scoped key and set TOGETHER_API_KEY. Avoid deprecated legacy keys.
- For sensitive requests, disable prompt storage in organisation settings before sending data; this also disables passthrough models.
- Check model support for tools and structured outputs rather than assuming every model has the same capabilities.
- Back off on 429 and 503 responses. Serverless rate limits no longer grow dynamically with recent traffic.
- Check the deprecation schedule before choosing a model. Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B leaves serverless on 4 November and MiniMax M3 and Inkling on 6 November 2026.
- Pin the SDK major version. Python SDK 3.0 and TypeScript SDK 1.0 (22 October 2026) drop
/v1from the base URL and thebetapaths
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Eden AI or Together AI Inference?
Together AI Inference scores 67.8 (B) on agent readiness against Eden AI's 59.9 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Eden AI leads on security & auth and payments & pricing.
Do Eden AI and Together AI Inference need an API key?
Both need an API key.
Can an agent call Eden AI and Together AI Inference without installing anything?
Yes. Eden AI has a hosted endpoint at https://mcp.edenai.run/mcp and Together AI Inference at https://api.together.ai/v1.
Other comparisons with Eden AI or Together AI Inference
- Amazon Bedrock vs Eden AI
- Amazon Bedrock vs Together AI Inference
- Claude API vs Eden AI
- Claude API vs Together AI Inference
- Antseed vs Together AI Inference
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Eden AI
- Azure OpenAI in Foundry Models vs Together AI Inference
- BlockRun.AI vs Eden AI
- BlockRun.AI vs Together AI Inference
- Cerebras Inference vs Eden AI
- Cerebras Inference vs Together AI Inference
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Eden AI
- Cloudflare AI Gateway vs Together AI Inference
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Eden AI
- Cloudflare Workers AI vs Together AI Inference
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Eden AI
- Cohere Chat API (Command models) vs Together AI Inference
- DeepInfra vs Eden AI
- DeepInfra vs Together AI Inference
- DeepSeek API vs Eden AI
- DeepSeek API vs Together AI Inference
- Eden AI vs Glimpse
- Eden AI vs Fireworks AI Inference
- Eden AI vs Gemini Developer API
- Eden AI vs GroqCloud
- Eden AI vs Inkling 2 Small
- Eden AI vs Jais 3
- Eden AI vs Meta Model API
- Eden AI vs MiniMax API
- Eden AI vs Mistral AI API
- Eden AI vs Muse Spark Open
- Eden AI vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
- Eden AI vs Novita AI
- Eden AI vs OpenAI API
- Eden AI vs Prism Inference
- Eden AI vs Beam 1.0
- Eden AI vs SambaCloud
- Eden AI vs SiliconFlow
- Eden AI vs Simplismart
- Eden AI vs StepFun API
- Eden AI vs SWE-2 Flash
- Eden AI vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- Eden AI vs xAI API (Grok)
- Glimpse vs Together AI Inference
- Fireworks AI Inference vs Together AI Inference
- Gemini Developer API vs Together AI Inference
- GroqCloud vs Together AI Inference
- Hugging Face Inference Providers vs Together AI Inference
- Inkling 2 Small vs Together AI Inference
- Jais 3 vs Together AI Inference
- Meta Model API vs Together AI Inference
- MiniMax API vs Together AI Inference
- Mistral AI API vs Together AI Inference
- Muse Spark Open vs Together AI Inference
- Novita AI vs Together AI Inference
- OpenAI API vs Together AI Inference
- OpenRouter vs Together AI Inference
- Prism Inference vs Together AI Inference
- Router.com (Ramp Router) vs Together AI Inference
- Beam 1.0 vs Together AI Inference
- RouterPlus vs Together AI Inference
- SambaCloud vs Together AI Inference
- SiliconFlow vs Together AI Inference
- Simplismart vs Together AI Inference
- StepFun API vs Together AI Inference
- SWE-2 Flash vs Together AI Inference
- Tencent Cloud TokenHub vs Together AI Inference
- Together AI Inference vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Together AI Inference vs Vertex AI (Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform)
- Together AI Inference vs xAI API (Grok)
- Antseed vs Eden AI
- Eden AI vs Hugging Face Inference Providers
- Eden AI vs LiteLLM
- Eden AI vs OpenRouter
- Eden AI vs Router.com (Ramp Router)
- Eden AI vs RouterPlus
- Eden AI vs Tencent Cloud TokenHub
- Eden AI vs Vercel AI Gateway
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Together AI Inference
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/eden-ai-vs-together-inference.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/eden-ai.json·/api/v1/tools/together-inference.json - From a terminal
anchor compare eden-ai together-inference(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "eden-ai", "b": "together-inference"}at/mcp, no key