Head to head · Sandbox code · October 2026 research run

Deno Sandbox vs Microsoft Execution Containers

Microsoft Execution Containers scores 76.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Deno Sandbox's 50.3 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do sandbox code.

Which one, for what

Deno Sandbox D

Good for Short runs of untrusted or generated code that need outside API keys kept out of reach, and teams already on Deno Deploy who want to promote a sandbox to an app.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

Beta since 3 February 2026. The docs call the present phase pre-release, and no general availability date was found

Microsoft Execution Containers BB

Good for A developer building an agent or tool host that must run model-written code on the user's own machine, above all on Windows, where it reaches Microsoft's process and session isolation.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 81 against 48
  • Schema & documentation, 81 against 66
  • Agent ergonomics, 74 against 60
  • Security & auth, 69 against 61
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 92 against 45
  • Transparency & trust, 83 against 58

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • No key needed to call it
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

1.0.0 shipped on 6 October 2026, and the Node changelog still lists the V1 changes under Unreleased

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runDeno SandboxMicrosoft Execution ContainersEdge
Reliability16%204881Microsoft Execution Containers +33
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26681Microsoft Execution Containers +15
Agent ergonomics13%16.26074Microsoft Execution Containers +14
Security & auth14%17.56169Microsoft Execution Containers +8
Payments & pricing10%12.52060Microsoft Execution Containers +40
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84592Microsoft Execution Containers +47
Transparency & trust7%8.85883Microsoft Execution Containers +25
Negative events≤15-20
Total50.3 · D76.3 · BB

Facts side by side

FactDeno SandboxMicrosoft Execution Containers
KindHTTP APISDK + MCP
VendorDeno Land Inc.Microsoft
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingPaidFree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under the Deno Deploy terms and conditions. The @deno/sandbox and deno-sandbox SDKs are MITMIT
Read-only variant documentedyesyes
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-07-222026-10-06
Terms last updated2026-09-30no document linked
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-30couldn't be read
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity6 stars, 2k npm/wk, 32k PyPI/wk1.5k stars, 472k npm/wk

Verdicts

Deno Sandbox

Secrets stay outside the microVM and are substituted only on outbound requests to approved hosts, and an allowlist limits egress. The service is still in beta, sandboxes need the $20 Pro plan, lifetime is capped at 30 minutes, and no sandbox operation appears in the published OpenAPI document.

Microsoft Execution Containers

MXC puts nine operating-system sandbox backends behind one typed request, with network access denied by default and a JSON Schema for the stable 1.0.0 contract. Version 1.0.0 is two days old as of 8 October 2026. Enforcement varies by backend, and isolation_session cannot restrict networking at all.

Before you call either

Deno Sandbox

  1. Set DENO_DEPLOY_TOKEN to an organisation token (prefix ddo_) from Settings in console.deno.com. The organisation must be on Pro or above
  2. Pass allowNet on every Sandbox.create(). The Security page says outbound access is unrestricted when it is omitted
  3. Pass credentials through secrets with a hosts list, not env, so code in the VM sees only a placeholder
  4. The default timeout ends the VM when the client disconnects. Pass a duration such as "10m" and reconnect with Sandbox.connect({ id }), up to 30 minutes
  5. Create volumes in ord and start the sandbox in ord. A volume mounts only in its own region
  6. exposeHttp URLs are public with no authentication. Treat the random subdomain as a secret

Microsoft Execution Containers

  1. Import from @microsoft/mxc-sdk/v1. The package root exports nothing.
  2. Call getPlatformSupport() first and stop if isSupported is false. getAvailableBackends() is advisory and launch-time validation still applies.
  3. Set network.egress.default to allow only when the task needs it. Omitted network policy resolves to deny in every direction.
  4. Never pass --audit to an executor for untrusted code. It turns off all sandbox security for the workload.
  5. Read ExecutionResult.warnings after each run. Security warnings arrive there and are not written to stdout or stderr.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Deno Sandbox or Microsoft Execution Containers?

Microsoft Execution Containers scores 76.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Deno Sandbox's 50.3 (D), and leads in every scored category.

Can an agent call Deno Sandbox and Microsoft Execution Containers without installing anything?

No hosted endpoint is listed for Deno Sandbox. No hosted endpoint is listed for Microsoft Execution Containers.

Are Deno Sandbox and Microsoft Execution Containers open source?

No open-source release is listed for Deno Sandbox. Microsoft Execution Containers is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with Deno Sandbox or Microsoft Execution Containers

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.