Head to head · Db vector · October 2026 research run

Chroma API + MCP vs Qdrant API + MCP

Qdrant API + MCP has a score of 75.3 (BB) against Chroma API + MCP's 45.4 (E). Both do db vector. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 50 points.

Which one, for what

Pick Chroma API + MCP for

No category where it leads by five points or more.

Pick Qdrant API + MCP for

  • reliability (+20)
  • schema & documentation (+16)
  • agent ergonomics (+14)
  • security & auth (+45)
  • maintenance & community (+50)
  • transparency & trust (+9)

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runChroma API + MCPQdrant API + MCPEdge
Reliability16%206080Qdrant API + MCP +20
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27187Qdrant API + MCP +16
Agent ergonomics13%16.27387Qdrant API + MCP +14
Security & auth14%17.53883Qdrant API + MCP +45
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.83585Qdrant API + MCP +50
Transparency & trust7%8.87584Qdrant API + MCP +9
Negative events≤15-10-2
Total45.4 · E75.3 · BB

Facts side by side

FactChroma API + MCPQdrant API + MCP
KindHTTP APIHTTP API
VendorChromaQdrant
Hosted endpointhttps://api.trychroma.com/api/v2https://api.cloud.qdrant.io
TransportsHTTP, stdioHTTP, stdio, Streamable HTTP
AuthAPI keyAPI key
PricingPay per useFreemium
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Tools exposed132
Context cost (tools/list)n/an/a
p95 latencynot measured yetnot measured yet
Availability (30d)not measured yetnot measured yet
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtyesyes
MCP registrynot listednot listed
Last release2026-06-302026-09-16
Popularity29k stars, 302k npm/wk, 1.6M PyPI/wk35k stars, 1.1M npm/wk, 3M PyPI/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (2)3.6/5 (8)

Verdicts

Chroma API + MCP

Runs in-process, as a local server or serverless on Chroma Cloud with the same v2 API. CVE-2026-45829, CVSS 9.3, has no patched release more than four months after the advisory.

Qdrant API + MCP

Database keys can be read-only, limited to chosen collections and expire after 90 days by default. The MCP server has 2 tools, can't manage collections or run filtered queries, and last released on 10 December 2025.

Before you call either

Chroma API + MCP

  1. Don't expose a self-hosted chromadb 1.5.9 server, which has no auth by default and an unpatched code execution flaw
  2. Batch writes in groups of 300 or fewer on Chroma Cloud
  3. Use the Search API for hybrid ranking. The older query() only does dense search plus filters
  4. Pass include without embeddings, since returned GiB are billed
  5. Don't pass ollama to chroma_create_collection. The description lists it but the server can't map it

Qdrant API + MCP

  1. Create payload indexes on the fields you filter on, or filtered search slows on large collections
  2. Use /points/query with prefetch to fuse dense and BM25 results
  3. Pass wait=true on upserts when the next step reads its own writes
  4. On 429, wait for the Retry-After seconds before retrying
  5. Set with_vector=false unless the task needs vectors, since they dominate response size

Other comparisons with Chroma API + MCP or Qdrant API + MCP

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.